IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i9p2249-d353782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electricity Portfolio Optimization for Large Consumers: Iberian Electricity Market Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuel Canelas

    (Department of Engineering and Management, CEG-IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Tânia Pinto-Varela

    (Department of Engineering and Management, CEG-IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Bartosz Sawik

    (Department of Applied Computer Science, School of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30059 Krakow, Poland
    Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

Abstract

Electricity markets are nowadays flooded with uncertainties that rise from renewable energy applications, technological development, and fossil fuel prices fluctuation, among others. These aspects result in a lumpy electricity prices for consumers, making it necessary to come up with risk management tools to help them hedge this associated risk. In this work a portfolio optimization applied to electricity sector, is proposed. A mixed integer programming model is presented to characterize the electricity portfolio of large consumers. The energy sources available for the portfolio characterization are the day-ahead spot market, forward contracts, and self-generation. The study novelty highlights the energy portfolio characterization for players denoted as large consumers, which has been overlooked by the scientific community and, focuses on the Iberian electricity market as a real case study. A multi-objective methodology is explored, using a weighted-sum approach. The expected cost and the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) minimization are used as objective function. Three case studies illustrate the model applicability through the characterization of how the portfolio evolves with different demand profiles and how to take advantage from seasonality characteristic in the spot market. A scenario analysis is explored to reflect the uncertainty on the price of the spot market. The expected cost and CVaR are optimized for each case study and the portfolio analysis for each risk posture is characterized. The results illustrate the advantage to reduce costs and risk if the prices seasonality is considered, triggering to an adaptive seasonal behavior, which support the decision-maker decision towards its goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuel Canelas & Tânia Pinto-Varela & Bartosz Sawik, 2020. "Electricity Portfolio Optimization for Large Consumers: Iberian Electricity Market Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2249-:d:353782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2249/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2249/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diethard Klatte & Hans-Jakob Lüthi & Karl Schmedders (ed.), 2012. "Operations Research Proceedings 2011," Operations Research Proceedings, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-29210-1, March.
    2. Chen, Y. & Trifkovic, M., 2018. "Optimal scheduling of a microgrid in a volatile electricity market environment: Portfolio optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 703-712.
    3. Huisman, Ronald & Mahieu, Ronald & Schlichter, Felix, 2009. "Electricity portfolio management: Optimal peak/off-peak allocations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 169-174, January.
    4. Pérez Odeh, Rodrigo & Watts, David & Negrete-Pincetic, Matías, 2018. "Portfolio applications in electricity markets review: Private investor and manager perspective trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 192-204.
    5. Gökgöz, Fazıl & Atmaca, Mete Emin, 2017. "Portfolio optimization under lower partial moments in emerging electricity markets: Evidence from Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 437-449.
    6. Wang, Jianjun & Li, Li, 2016. "Sustainable energy development scenario forecasting and energy saving policy analysis of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 718-724.
    7. Park, Sang Yong & Yun, Bo-Yeong & Yun, Chang Yeol & Lee, Duk Hee & Choi, Dong Gu, 2016. "An analysis of the optimum renewable energy portfolio using the bottom–up model: Focusing on the electricity generation sector in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 319-329.
    8. Toczylowski, Eugeniusz & Zoltowska, Izabela, 2009. "A new pricing scheme for a multi-period pool-based electricity auction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 1051-1062, September.
    9. Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Lopolito, Antonio & Sica, Edgardo, 2019. "Instrument mix for energy transition: A method for policy formulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Babonneau, Frédéric & Caramanis, Michael & Haurie, Alain, 2016. "A linear programming model for power distribution with demand response and variable renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 83-95.
    11. Cui, Yunfei & Geng, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Qunxiong & Han, Yongming, 2017. "Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 681-704.
    12. Bartosz Sawik, 2012. "Downside Risk Approach for Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Diethard Klatte & Hans-Jakob Lüthi & Karl Schmedders (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2011, edition 127, pages 191-196, Springer.
    13. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    14. Antonio J. Conejo & Miguel Carrión & Juan M. Morales, 2010. "Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4419-7421-1, March.
    15. Huisman, Ronald & Mahieu, Ronald, 2003. "Regime jumps in electricity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 425-434, September.
    16. deLlano-Paz, Fernando & Calvo-Silvosa, Anxo & Antelo, Susana Iglesias & Soares, Isabel, 2017. "Energy planning and modern portfolio theory: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 636-651.
    17. Pérez Odeh, Rodrigo & Watts, David & Flores, Yarela, 2018. "Planning in a changing environment: Applications of portfolio optimisation to deal with risk in the electricity sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3808-3823.
    18. Bao, Xiongjiantao & Zhao, Wenhui & Wang, Xiaomei & Tan, Zhongfu, 2019. "Impact of policy mix concerning renewable portfolio standards and emissions trading on electricity market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 761-774.
    19. Hu, Jing & Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Worrell, Ernst, 2019. "Geographical optimization of variable renewable energy capacity in China using modern portfolio theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Costa, Oswaldo L.V. & de Oliveira Ribeiro, Celma & Rego, Erik Eduardo & Stern, Julio Michael & Parente, Virginia & Kileber, Solange, 2017. "Robust portfolio optimization for electricity planning: An application based on the Brazilian electricity mix," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 158-169.
    21. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "The Optimization Approach," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 107-134, Springer.
    22. Kaleta, Mariusz & Toczylowski, Eugeniusz, 2008. "Restriction techniques for the unit-commitment problem with total procurement costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2439-2448, July.
    23. Pasquale Marcello Falcone, 2019. "Tourism-Based Circular Economy in Salento (South Italy): A SWOT-ANP Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Antunes & Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana & Rossana Riccardi & Yong Tan & Peter Wanke, 2022. "Unveiling endogeneity and temporal dependence in energy prices and demand in Iberian countries: a stochastic hidden Markov model approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(1), pages 191-229, June.
    2. Liu, An & Wang, Xinyu & Tang, Jiafu, 2024. "Optimizing multi-channel procurement planning under disruption risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Carlo Andrea Bollino & Philipp Galkin, 2021. "Energy Security and Portfolio Diversification: Conventional and Novel Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Micha{l} Narajewski & Florian Ziel, 2021. "Optimal bidding in hourly and quarter-hourly electricity price auctions: trading large volumes of power with market impact and transaction costs," Papers 2104.14204, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    5. Li, Zhenkun & Yao, Yicong & Zhao, Nan & Shan, Jie & Fu, Yang, 2024. "Study on integrated energy microgrid energy purchase strategy with demand-side response in market environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    6. Minhui Qian & Ning Chen & Yuge Chen & Changming Chen & Weiqiang Qiu & Dawei Zhao & Zhenzhi Lin, 2021. "Optimal Coordinated Dispatching Strategy of Multi-Sources Power System with Wind, Hydro and Thermal Power Based on CVaR in Typhoon Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-35, June.
    7. Štefan Bojnec & Alan Križaj, 2021. "Electricity Markets during the Liberalization: The Case of a European Union Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Bartosz Sawik, 2023. "Space Mission Risk, Sustainability and Supply Chain: Review, Multi-Objective Optimization Model and Practical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Ethem Çanakoğlu & Esra Adıyeke, 2020. "Comparison of Electricity Spot Price Modelling and Risk Management Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Narajewski, Michał & Ziel, Florian, 2022. "Optimal bidding in hourly and quarter-hourly electricity price auctions: Trading large volumes of power with market impact and transaction costs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changyu Zhou & Guohe Huang & Jiapei Chen, 2019. "A Type-2 Fuzzy Chance-Constrained Fractional Integrated Modeling Method for Energy System Management of Uncertainties and Risks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Purkayastha, Sagar N. & Chen, Yujun & Gates, Ian D. & Trifkovic, Milana, 2020. "A kelly criterion based optimal scheduling of a microgrid on a steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) facility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Mollik, Sazib & Rashid, M.M. & Hasanuzzaman, M. & Karim, M.E. & Hosenuzzaman, M., 2016. "Prospects, progress, policies, and effects of rural electrification in Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 553-567.
    4. Fonseca, Juan D. & Commenge, Jean-Marc & Camargo, Mauricio & Falk, Laurent & Gil, Iván D., 2021. "Sustainability analysis for the design of distributed energy systems: A multi-objective optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    5. Kanwal Iqbal Khan & Syed M. Waqar Azeem Naqvi & Muhammad Mudassar Ghafoor & Rana Shahid Imdad Akash, 2020. "Sustainable Portfolio Optimization with Higher-Order Moments of Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Gholami, M. & Barbaresi, A. & Torreggiani, D. & Tassinari, P., 2020. "Upscaling of spatial energy planning, phases, methods, and techniques: A systematic review through meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Gabriel Frahm, 2018. "An Intersection–Union Test for the Sharpe Ratio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Xu, Jie & Lv, Tao & Hou, Xiaoran & Deng, Xu & Liu, Feng, 2021. "Provincial allocation of renewable portfolio standard in China based on efficiency and fairness principles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1233-1245.
    9. Carmen de la Cruz-Lovera & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno & José Luis de la Cruz-Fernández & Francisco G. Montoya & Alfredo Alcayde & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2019. "Analysis of Research Topics and Scientific Collaborations in Energy Saving Using Bibliometric Techniques and Community Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Díaz, Guzmán & Coto, José & Gómez-Aleixandre, Javier, 2019. "Prediction and explanation of the formation of the Spanish day-ahead electricity price through machine learning regression," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 610-625.
    11. Mohammed Abdullah H. Alshehri & Youguang Guo & Gang Lei, 2023. "Energy Management Strategies of Grid-Connected Microgrids under Different Reliability Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Inzunza, Andrés & Muñoz, Francisco D. & Moreno, Rodrigo, 2021. "Measuring the effects of environmental policies on electricity markets risk," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Cao, K.H. & Qi, H.S. & Tsai, C.H. & Woo, C.K. & Zarnikau, J., 2021. "Energy trading efficiency in the US Midcontinent electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    14. Zhang, Bo & Qu, Xue & Meng, Jing & Sun, Xudong, 2017. "Identifying primary energy requirements in structural path analysis: A case study of China 2012," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 425-435.
    15. Musa, S. Danlami & Zhonghua, Tang & Ibrahim, Abdullateef O. & Habib, Mukhtar, 2018. "China's energy status: A critical look at fossils and renewable options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2281-2290.
    16. Zhang, Linyun & Huang, Feiming & Lu, Lu & Ni, Xinwen, 2021. "Green financial development improving energy efficiency and economic growth: A study of CPEC area in COVID-19 era," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2021-017, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    17. Pérez Odeh, Rodrigo & Watts, David & Negrete-Pincetic, Matías, 2018. "Portfolio applications in electricity markets review: Private investor and manager perspective trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 192-204.
    18. Jorge Antunes & Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana & Rossana Riccardi & Yong Tan & Peter Wanke, 2022. "Unveiling endogeneity and temporal dependence in energy prices and demand in Iberian countries: a stochastic hidden Markov model approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(1), pages 191-229, June.
    19. Carlo Andrea Bollino & Philipp Galkin, 2021. "Energy Security and Portfolio Diversification: Conventional and Novel Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    20. Li, Carmen & Chyong, Chi Kong & Reiner, David M. & Roques, Fabien, 2024. "Taking a Portfolio approach to wind and solar deployment: The case of the National Electricity Market in Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2249-:d:353782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.