IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i7p1771-d342317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goal Programming Application for Contract Pricing of Electric Vehicle Aggregator in Join Day-Ahead Market

Author

Listed:
  • Parinaz Aliasghari

    (Department of Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo

    (Department of Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
    Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam)

  • Mehdi Abapour

    (Department of Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Ali Ahmadian

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab 5551761167, Iran
    College of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Ali Elkamel

    (College of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    College of Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi 127788, UAE)

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate contract price between electric vehicle aggregators and electric vehicle owners is an uncertain, multi-criteria decision-making issue. In addition, the results can cause strong conflict due to different aims: the optimal value for increasing electric vehicle aggregator (EVA) profit negatively affects the cost for owners. The value of the contract price can change the optimal scheduling of EVAs in the day-ahead market. Taking into consideration this context, the current paper proposes to solve the multi-objective scheduling problem of an aggregator with a goal programming approach. The presented approach sets a satisfaction level for each goal according to decision-makers’ preference. Numerical results illustrate the validity of this approach to balance different performance measures. Furthermore, optimal scheduling of electric vehicle aggregators in the day-ahead market is created.

Suggested Citation

  • Parinaz Aliasghari & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Mehdi Abapour & Ali Ahmadian & Ali Elkamel, 2020. "Goal Programming Application for Contract Pricing of Electric Vehicle Aggregator in Join Day-Ahead Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:1771-:d:342317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alipour, Manijeh & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Moradi-Dalvand, Mohammad & Zare, Kazem, 2017. "Stochastic scheduling of aggregators of plug-in electric vehicles for participation in energy and ancillary service markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1168-1179.
    2. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    3. Mingchao Xia & Qingying Lai & Yajiao Zhong & Canbing Li & Hsiao-Dong Chiang, 2016. "Aggregator-Based Interactive Charging Management System for Electric Vehicle Charging," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Broz, Diego & Vanzetti, Nicolás & Corsano, Gabriela & Montagna, Jorge M., 2019. "Goal programming application for the decision support in the daily production planning of sawmills," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 29-40.
    5. Ahmadian, Ali & Sedghi, Mahdi & Fgaier, Hedia & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Golkar, Masoud Aliakbar & Elkamel, Ali, 2019. "PEVs data mining based on factor analysis method for energy storage and DG planning in active distribution network: Introducing S2S effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 265-277.
    6. Bigerna, S. & Bollino, C.A. & Micheli, S. & Polinori, P., 2017. "Revealed and stated preferences for CO2 emissions reduction: The missing link," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1213-1221.
    7. Škugor, Branimir & Deur, Joško, 2015. "Dynamic programming-based optimisation of charging an electric vehicle fleet system represented by an aggregate battery model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 456-465.
    8. Lin, Haiyang & Liu, Yiling & Sun, Qie & Xiong, Rui & Li, Hailong & Wennersten, Ronald, 2018. "The impact of electric vehicle penetration and charging patterns on the management of energy hub – A multi-agent system simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 189-206.
    9. Tabatabaee, Sajad & Mortazavi, Seyed Saeedallah & Niknam, Taher, 2017. "Stochastic scheduling of local distribution systems considering high penetration of plug-in electric vehicles and renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 480-490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isaias Gomes & Rui Melicio & Victor Mendes, 2020. "Comparison between Inflexible and Flexible Charging of Electric Vehicles—A Study from the Perspective of an Aggregator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2020. "A New Application for the Goal Programming—The Target Decision Rule for Uncertain Problems," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. António Sérgio Faria & Tiago Soares & Tiago Sousa & Manuel A. Matos, 2020. "Participation of an EV Aggregator in the Reserve Market through Chance-Constrained Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Homa Rashidizadeh-Kermani & Hamid Reza Najafi & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Josep M. Guerrero, 2018. "Optimal Decision-Making Strategy of an Electric Vehicle Aggregator in Short-Term Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Saleh Aghajan-Eshkevari & Sasan Azad & Morteza Nazari-Heris & Mohammad Taghi Ameli & Somayeh Asadi, 2022. "Charging and Discharging of Electric Vehicles in Power Systems: An Updated and Detailed Review of Methods, Control Structures, Objectives, and Optimization Methodologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, February.
    3. Morteza Nazari-Heris & Mehdi Abapour & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo, 2022. "An Updated Review and Outlook on Electric Vehicle Aggregators in Electric Energy Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Ahmadian, Ali & Sedghi, Mahdi & Fgaier, Hedia & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Golkar, Masoud Aliakbar & Elkamel, Ali, 2019. "PEVs data mining based on factor analysis method for energy storage and DG planning in active distribution network: Introducing S2S effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 265-277.
    5. Qi, Wei & Shen, Bo & Zhang, Hongcai & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2017. "Sharing demand-side energy resources - A conceptual design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 455-465.
    6. Torgler, Benno & Schneider, Friedrich & Schaltegger, Christoph A., 2007. "With or Against the People? The Impact of a Bottom-Up Approach on Tax Morale and the Shadow Economy," Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper Series qt6331x6vz, Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics.
    7. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    8. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    9. Jae Wook Yoo & Richard Reed & Shung Jae Shin & David J. Lemak, 2009. "Strategic Choice and Performance in Late Movers: Influence of the Top Management Team's External Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 308-335, March.
    10. Giovanni Calice & Levent Kutlu & Ming Zeng, 2021. "Understanding US firm efficiency and its asset pricing implications," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 803-827, February.
    11. Westerhoff, Frank H. & Dieci, Roberto, 2006. "The effectiveness of Keynes-Tobin transaction taxes when heterogeneous agents can trade in different markets: A behavioral finance approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 293-322, February.
    12. Jin, Ruiyang & Zhou, Yuke & Lu, Chao & Song, Jie, 2022. "Deep reinforcement learning-based strategy for charging station participating in demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    13. José Castro Caldas & Helder Coelho, 1999. "The Origin of Institutions: Socio-Economic Processes, Choice, Norms and Conventions," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 2(2), pages 1-1.
    14. Nagler Matthew G., 2007. "Understanding the Internet's Relevance to Media Ownership Policy: A Model of Too Many Choices," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, June.
    15. Ranganathan, Kavitha & Lejarraga, Tomás, 2021. "Elicitation of risk preferences through satisficing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    16. Westerhoff Frank H., 2008. "The Use of Agent-Based Financial Market Models to Test the Effectiveness of Regulatory Policies," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 228(2-3), pages 195-227, April.
    17. Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean & Daniel Martin, 2011. "Search and Satisficing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2899-2922, December.
    18. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    20. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:1771-:d:342317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.