IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i7p1549-d337391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Power Control Approach for Wind Turbine Fatigue Balancing in an Offshore Wind Farm

Author

Listed:
  • Rongyong Zhao

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Daheng Dong

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Cuiling Li

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Steven Liu

    (Institute of Control Systems, University of Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany)

  • Hao Zhang

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Miyuan Li

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Wenzhong Shen

    (Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

Increasing maintenance costs will hinder the expansion of the wind power industry in the coming decades. Training personnel, field maintenance, and frequent boat or helicopter visits to wind turbines (WTs) is becoming a large cost. One reason for this cost is the routine turbine inspection repair and other stochastic maintenance necessitated by increasingly unbalanced figure loads and unequal turbine fatigue distribution in large-scale offshore wind farms (OWFs). In order to solve the problems of unbalanced fatigue loads and unequal turbine fatigue distribution, thereby cutting the maintenance cost, this study analyzes the disadvantages of conventional turbine fatigue definitions. We propose an improved fatigue definition that simultaneously considers the mean wind speed, wind wake turbulence, and electric power generation. Further, based on timed automata theory, a power dispatch approach is proposed to balance the fatigue loads on turbines in a wind farm. A control topology is constructed to describe the logical states of the wind farm main controller (WFMC) in an offshore wind farm. With this novel power control approach, the WFMC can re-dispatch the reference power to the wind turbines according to their cumulative fatigue value and the real wind conditions around the individual turbines in every power dispatch time interval. A workflow is also designed for the control approach implementation. Finally, to validate this proposed approach, wind data from the Horns Rev offshore wind farm in Denmark are used for a numerical simulation. All the simulation results with 3D and 2D figures illustrate that this approach is feasible to balance the loads on an offshore wind farm. Some significant implications are that this novel approach can cut the maintenance cost and also prolong the service life of OWFs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rongyong Zhao & Daheng Dong & Cuiling Li & Steven Liu & Hao Zhang & Miyuan Li & Wenzhong Shen, 2020. "An Improved Power Control Approach for Wind Turbine Fatigue Balancing in an Offshore Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:1549-:d:337391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mäkitie, Tuukka & Normann, Håkon E. & Thune, Taran M. & Sraml Gonzalez, Jakoba, 2019. "The green flings: Norwegian oil and gas industry’s engagement in offshore wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 269-279.
    2. Njiri, Jackson G. & Beganovic, Nejra & Do, Manh H. & Söffker, Dirk, 2019. "Consideration of lifetime and fatigue load in wind turbine control," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 818-828.
    3. Marino, Enzo & Giusti, Alessandro & Manuel, Lance, 2017. "Offshore wind turbine fatigue loads: The influence of alternative wave modeling for different turbulent and mean winds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 157-169.
    4. Kusiak, Andrew & Li, Wenyan & Song, Zhe, 2010. "Dynamic control of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 456-463.
    5. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Faiz, Tasnim Ibn, 2016. "Minimizing maintenance cost for offshore wind turbines following multi-level opportunistic preventive strategy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 104-113.
    6. Ziegler, Lisa & Voormeeren, Sven & Schafhirt, Sebastian & Muskulus, Michael, 2016. "Design clustering of offshore wind turbines using probabilistic fatigue load estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 425-433.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.
    2. Denis Sidorov & Fang Liu & Yonghui Sun, 2020. "Machine Learning for Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-6, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Han & Yan, Jie & Han, Shuang & Liu, Yongqian, 2020. "Switching strategy of the low wind speed wind turbine based on real-time wind process prediction for the integration of wind power and EVs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 256-272.
    2. Rezaei, Ramtin & Fromme, Paul & Duffour, Philippe, 2018. "Fatigue life sensitivity of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines to damping," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 450-459.
    3. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    4. Petković, Dalibor & Ćojbašič, Žarko & Nikolić, Vlastimir, 2013. "Adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for wind turbine power coefficient estimation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 191-195.
    5. Liang Lu & Minyan Zhu & Haijun Wu & Jianzhong Wu, 2022. "A Review and Case Analysis on Biaxial Synchronous Loading Technology and Fast Moment-Matching Methods for Fatigue Tests of Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-34, July.
    6. Niklas Andersen & Ola Eriksson & Karl Hillman & Marita Wallhagen, 2016. "Wind Turbines’ End-of-Life: Quantification and Characterisation of Future Waste Materials on a National Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Hongsheng Su & Yifan Zhao & Xueqian Wang, 2023. "Analysis of a State Degradation Model and Preventive Maintenance Strategies for Wind Turbine Generators Based on Stochastic Differential Equations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Seixas, M. & Melício, R. & Mendes, V.M.F. & Couto, C., 2016. "Blade pitch control malfunction simulation in a wind energy conversion system with MPC five-level converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 339-350.
    9. Tuukka Mäkitie & Allan D. Andersen & Jens Hanson, 2019. "Multidimensional relatedness between innovation systems in sustainability transitions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1926, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2019.
    10. Nejra Beganovic & Jackson G. Njiri & Dirk Söffker, 2018. "Reduction of Structural Loads in Wind Turbines Based on an Adapted Control Strategy Concerning Online Fatigue Damage Evaluation Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Nguyen, Thi Anh Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan, 2018. "Impact of government subsidies on economic feasibility of offshore wind system: Implications for Taiwan energy policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 336-345.
    12. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    13. Hossein Madi & Dmytro Lytvynenko & Tilman Schildhauer & Peter Jansohn, 2023. "Decarbonisation of Geographical Islands and the Feasibility of Green Hydrogen Production Using Excess Electricity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Elena Shadrina, 2020. "Non-Hydropower Renewable Energy in Central Asia: Assessment of Deployment Status and Analysis of Underlying Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    15. Jiang, Yu & Song, Zhe & Kusiak, Andrew, 2013. "Very short-term wind speed forecasting with Bayesian structural break model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 637-647.
    16. Wei Teng & Xiaolong Zhang & Yibing Liu & Andrew Kusiak & Zhiyong Ma, 2016. "Prognosis of the Remaining Useful Life of Bearings in a Wind Turbine Gearbox," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Armenia Androniceanu & Oana Matilda Sabie, 2022. "Overview of Green Energy as a Real Strategic Option for Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-35, November.
    18. Hongmin Meng & Tingting Yang & Ji-zhen Liu & Zhongwei Lin, 2017. "A Flexible Maximum Power Point Tracking Control Strategy Considering Both Conversion Efficiency and Power Fluctuation for Large-inertia Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Fausto Pedro García Marquez & Carlos Quiterio Gómez Muñoz, 2020. "A New Approach for Fault Detection, Location and Diagnosis by Ultrasonic Testing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.
    20. van der Loos, Adriaan & Normann, Håkon E. & Hanson, Jens & Hekkert, Marko P., 2021. "The co-evolution of innovation systems and context: Offshore wind in Norway and the Netherlands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:1549-:d:337391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.