IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5529-d433115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Performance-Assessment Methods for Residential PV Battery Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Niedermeyer

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology, Koenigstor 59, 34119 Kassel, Germany)

  • Martin Braun

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology, Koenigstor 59, 34119 Kassel, Germany
    Energy Management and Power System Operation (e2n), University of Kassel, Wilhelmshoeher Allee 73, 34121 Kassel, Germany)

Abstract

Declining costs for high-performance batteries are leading to a global increased use of storage systems in residential buildings. Especially in conjunction with reduced photovoltaic (PV) feed-in tariffs, a large market has been developed for PV battery systems to increase self-sufficiency. They differ in the type of coupling between PV and battery, the nominal capacities of their components, and their degree of integration. High system performance is particularly important to achieve profitability for the operator. This paper presents and evaluates methods for a uniform determination of PV battery system performance. Already the requirement analysis reveals that a performance comparison of PV battery systems must cover the efficiency and effectiveness during system operation. A method based on a derivation of key performance indicators (KPIs) for these two criteria through an application test is proposed. It is evaluated by comparison to other methods, such as the System Performance Index (SPI) and aggregation of conversion and storage efficiency. These methods are applied with five systems in a laboratory test bench to identify their advantages and drawbacks. Here, a particular focus is on compliance with the initially formulated requirements in terms of both test procedures and KPI derivations. Analysis revealed that the proposed method addresses these requirements well, and is beneficial in terms of result comprehensibility and KPI validity.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Niedermeyer & Martin Braun, 2020. "Comparison of Performance-Assessment Methods for Residential PV Battery Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5529-:d:433115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5529/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5529/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ram, J. Prasanth & Manghani, Himanshu & Pillai, Dhanup S. & Babu, T. Sudhakar & Miyatake, Masafumi & Rajasekar, N., 2018. "Analysis on solar PV emulators: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 149-160.
    2. Merrick, James H., 2016. "On representation of temporal variability in electricity capacity planning models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 261-274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ludwik Wicki & Robert Pietrzykowski & Dariusz Kusz, 2022. "Factors Determining the Development of Prosumer Photovoltaic Installations in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luna, M. & Di Piazza, M.C. & La Tona, G. & Accetta, A. & Pucci, M., 2021. "Exploiting dynamic modeling, parameter identification, and power electronics to implement a non-dissipative Li-ion battery hardware emulator," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 48-65.
    2. Alimou, Yacine & Maïzi, Nadia & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Li, Marion, 2020. "Assessing the security of electricity supply through multi-scale modeling: The TIMES-ANTARES linking approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Kenjiro Yagi & Ramteen Sioshansi, 2023. "Simplifying capacity planning for electricity systems with hydroelectric and renewable generation," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Athanasios Ioannis Arvanitidis & Vivek Agarwal & Miltiadis Alamaniotis, 2023. "Nuclear-Driven Integrated Energy Systems: A State-of-the-Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Merrick, James H. & Weyant, John P., 2019. "On choosing the resolution of normative models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 511-523.
    6. Merrick, James H. & Bistline, John E.T. & Blanford, Geoffrey J., 2024. "On representation of energy storage in electricity planning models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Li, Yuan & Zhou, You & Yi, Bo-Wen & Wang, Ya, 2021. "Impacts of the coal resource tax on the electric power industry in China: A multi-regional comprehensive analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Niina Helistö & Juha Kiviluoma & Hannele Holttinen & Jose Daniel Lara & Bri‐Mathias Hodge, 2019. "Including operational aspects in the planning of power systems with large amounts of variable generation: A review of modeling approaches," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), September.
    9. Chaabane Bouali & Horst Schulte & Abdelkader Mami, 2019. "A High Performance Optimizing Method for Modeling Photovoltaic Cells and Modules Array Based on Discrete Symbiosis Organism Search," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-32, June.
    10. Frew, Bethany A. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2016. "Temporal and spatial tradeoffs in power system modeling with assumptions about storage: An application of the POWER model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 198-213.
    11. Yu, Jinna & Tang, Yuk Ming & Chau, Ka Yin & Nazar, Raima & Ali, Sajid & Iqbal, Wasim, 2022. "Role of solar-based renewable energy in mitigating CO2 emissions: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 216-226.
    12. Priya, K. & Sathishkumar, K. & Rajasekar, N., 2018. "A comprehensive review on parameter estimation techniques for Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 121-144.
    13. Kenjiro Yagi & Ramteen Sioshansi, 2024. "Nested Benders’s decomposition of capacity-planning problems for electricity systems with hydroelectric and renewable generation," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    14. Reichenberg, Lina & Hedenus, Fredrik & Odenberger, Mikael & Johnsson, Filip, 2018. "The marginal system LCOE of variable renewables – Evaluating high penetration levels of wind and solar in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 914-924.
    15. Chin, Vun Jack & Salam, Zainal, 2019. "A New Three-point-based Approach for the Parameter Extraction of Photovoltaic Cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 519-533.
    16. Maximilian Hoffmann & Leander Kotzur & Detlef Stolten & Martin Robinius, 2020. "A Review on Time Series Aggregation Methods for Energy System Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-61, February.
    17. Pillai, Dhanup S. & Rajasekar, N., 2018. "Metaheuristic algorithms for PV parameter identification: A comprehensive review with an application to threshold setting for fault detection in PV systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3503-3525.
    18. Michael C. Ferris & Andy Philpott, 2023. "Renewable electricity capacity planning with uncertainty at multiple scales," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-40, December.
    19. Larbi Chrifi-Alaoui & Saïd Drid & Mohammed Ouriagli & Driss Mehdi, 2023. "Overview of Photovoltaic and Wind Electrical Power Hybrid Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-35, June.
    20. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z. & Fleming, Peter J., 2019. "A multi-objective framework for long-term generation expansion planning with variable renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5529-:d:433115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.