IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i1p260-d305283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FPGA-Based Implementation of Finite Set-MPC for a VSI System Using XSG-Based Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Vijay Kumar Singh

    (Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka 808-0196, Japan)

  • Ravi Nath Tripathi

    (Next Generation Power Electronics Research Center, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka 808-0196, Japan)

  • Tsuyoshi Hanamoto

    (Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka 808-0196, Japan)

Abstract

Finite set-model predictive control (FS-MPC) is used for power converters and drives having unique advantages as compared to the conventional control strategies. However, the computational burden of the FS-MPC is a primary concern for real-time implementation. Field programmable gate array (FPGA) is an alternative and exciting solution for real-time implementation because of the parallel processing capability, as well as, discrete nature of the hardware platform. Nevertheless, FPGA is capable of handling the computational requirements for the FS-MPC implementation, however, the system development involves multiple steps that lead to the time-consuming debugging process. Moreover, specific hardware coding skill makes it more complex corresponding to an increase in system complexity that leads to a tedious task for system development. This paper presents an FPGA-based experimental implementation of FS-MPC using the system modeling approach. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of FS-MPC in stationary αβ and rotating dq frame is considered for simulation as well as experimental result. The FS-MPC for a three-phase voltage source inverter (VSI) system is developed in a realistic digital simulator integrated with MATLAB-Simulink. The simulated controller model is further used for experimental system implementation and validation using Xilinx FPGA: Zedboard Zynq Evaluation and Development Kit. The digital simulator termed as Xilinx system generator (XSG) provided by Xilinx is used for modeling-based FPGA design.

Suggested Citation

  • Vijay Kumar Singh & Ravi Nath Tripathi & Tsuyoshi Hanamoto, 2020. "FPGA-Based Implementation of Finite Set-MPC for a VSI System Using XSG-Based Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:260-:d:305283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/260/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/260/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hussain Sarwar Khan & Muhammad Aamir & Muhammad Ali & Asad Waqar & Syed Umaid Ali & Junaid Imtiaz, 2019. "Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control for Parallel Connected Online UPS System under Unbalanced and Nonlinear Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Vijay Kumar Singh & Ravi Nath Tripathi & Tsuyoshi Hanamoto, 2018. "HIL Co-Simulation of Finite Set-Model Predictive Control Using FPGA for a Three-Phase VSI System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karol Wróbel & Piotr Serkies & Krzysztof Szabat, 2020. "Model Predictive Base Direct Speed Control of Induction Motor Drive—Continuous and Finite Set Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Jaime A. Rohten & David N. Dewar & Pericle Zanchetta & Andrea Formentini & Javier A. Muñoz & Carlos R. Baier & José J. Silva, 2021. "Multivariable Deadbeat Control of Power Electronics Converters with Fast Dynamic Response and Fixed Switching Frequency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luís Caseiro & André Mendes, 2021. "Fault Analysis and Non-Redundant Fault Tolerance in 3-Level Double Conversion UPS Systems Using Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-39, April.
    2. Cheng-Kai Lin & Jen-te Yu & Hao-Qun Huang & Jyun-Ting Wang & Hsing-Cheng Yu & Yen-Shin Lai, 2018. "A Dual-Voltage-Vector Model-Free Predictive Current Controller for Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drive Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Yuzhe Zhang & Xiaodong Liu & Haitao Li & Zhenbin Zhang, 2023. "A Model Independent Predictive Control of PMSG Wind Turbine Systems with a New Mechanism to Update Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Deepa Sankar & Lakshmi Syamala & Babu Chembathu Ayyappan & Mathew Kallarackal, 2021. "FPGA-Based Cost-Effective and Resource Optimized Solution of Predictive Direct Current Control for Power Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Van-Quang-Binh Ngo & Minh-Khai Nguyen & Tan-Tai Tran & Young-Cheol Lim & Joon-Ho Choi, 2018. "A Simplified Model Predictive Control for T-Type Inverter with Output LC Filter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Tiago Oliveira & Luís Caseiro & André Mendes & Sérgio Cruz & Marina Perdigão, 2021. "Model Predictive Control for Paralleled Uninterruptible Power Supplies with an Additional Inverter Leg for Load-Side Neutral Connection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Jian Li & Xiaoyan Huang & Feng Niu & Chaojie You & Lijian Wu & Youtong Fang, 2018. "Prediction Error Analysis of Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Current Control for IPMSMs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Muhammad Zubair Asif Bhatti & Abubakar Siddique & Waseem Aslam & Shahid Atiq & Hussain Sarwar Khan, 2023. "Improved Model Predictive Direct Power Control for Parallel Distributed Generation in Grid-Tied Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Agnieszka Kowal G. & Manuel R. Arahal & Cristina Martin & Federico Barrero, 2019. "Constraint Satisfaction in Current Control of a Five-Phase Drive with Locally Tuned Predictive Controllers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-9, July.
    10. Tiago Oliveira & Luís Caseiro & André Mendes & Sérgio Cruz, 2020. "Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control for Paralleled Uninterruptible Power Supplies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-30, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:260-:d:305283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.