IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5006-d418020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Desalination Technologies Powered by SMR

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Hadi Ghazaie

    (Department of Atomic and Heat- and -Power Engineering, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Khashayar Sadeghi

    (Department of Atomic and Heat- and -Power Engineering, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Ekaterina Sokolova

    (Department of Atomic and Heat- and -Power Engineering, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Evgeniy Fedorovich

    (Department of Atomic and Heat- and -Power Engineering, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Amirsaeed Shirani

    (Faculty of Nuclear Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University of Iran, Tehran 1983963113, Iran)

Abstract

Small modular reactors (SMRs) represent a key area of interest to nuclear industry developers, which have been making significant progress during the past few years. Generally, these reactors are promising owing to their improved safety due to passive systems, enhanced containment efficiency, and fewer capital costs in comparison to traditional nuclear reactors. An important advantage of SMRs is their adaptability in being coupled to other energy-consuming systems, such as desalination plants (DPs) to create a cogeneration plant. Considering the serious challenges regarding the freshwater shortage in many regions of the world and the necessity of using low-carbon energy sources, it is advantageous to use SMR for supplying the required heat and electricity of DPs. As a high-performance desalination technology, the hybrid desalination (HD) systems can be exploited, which retain the advantages of both thermal and membrane desalination methods. In this study, several SMR coupling schemes to HD plants have been suggested. In performing a thermodynamic analysis of integrated SMR-DP, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Desalination Thermodynamic Optimization Program (DE-TOP) has been utilized. It has been found that the use of relatively hot water from the SMR condenser leads to about 6.5 to 7.5% of total desalination cost reduction, where the produced electricity and hot steam extracted from low-pressure turbine were used to drive the HD system.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Hadi Ghazaie & Khashayar Sadeghi & Ekaterina Sokolova & Evgeniy Fedorovich & Amirsaeed Shirani, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Desalination Technologies Powered by SMR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5006-:d:418020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5006/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5006/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Salah Ud-Din & Khan, Shahab Ud-Din, 2017. "Karachi Nuclear Power Plant (KANUPP): As case study for techno-economic assessment of nuclear power coupled with water desalination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 372-380.
    2. Alessandro Corsini & Eileen Tortora, 2018. "Sea-Water Desalination for Load Levelling of Gen-Sets in Small Off-Grid Islands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Mignacca, B. & Locatelli, G., 2020. "Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors: A systematic review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Volk, Rebekka & Hübner, Felix & Hünlich, Tobias & Schultmann, Frank, 2019. "The future of nuclear decommissioning – A worldwide market potential study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 226-261.
    5. Chireuding Zeliang & Yi Mi & Akira Tokuhiro & Lixuan Lu & Aleksey Rezvoi, 2020. "Integral PWR-Type Small Modular Reactor Developmental Status, Design Characteristics and Passive Features: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Antti Teräsvirta & Sanna Syri & Pauli Hiltunen, 2020. "Small Nuclear Reactor—Nordic District Heating Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ekaterina Sokolova & Khashayar Sadeghi & Seyed Hadi Ghazaie & Dario Barsi & Francesca Satta & Pietro Zunino, 2022. "Feasibility of Hybrid Desalination Plants Coupled with Small Gas Turbine CHP Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Zedong Zhou & Jinsen Xie & Nianbiao Deng & Pengyu Chen & Zhiqiang Wu & Tao Yu, 2023. "Effect of KLT-40S Fuel Assembly Design on Burnup Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Carlo L. Vinoya & Aristotle T. Ubando & Alvin B. Culaba & Wei-Hsin Chen, 2023. "State-of-the-Art Review of Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo Fernández-Arias & Diego Vergara & Álvaro Antón-Sancho, 2023. "Bibliometric Review and Technical Summary of PWR Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Carlo L. Vinoya & Aristotle T. Ubando & Alvin B. Culaba & Wei-Hsin Chen, 2023. "State-of-the-Art Review of Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Christian von Hirschhausen, 2022. "Nuclear Power in the Twenty-first Century (Part II) - The Economic Value of Plutonium," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2011, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Ernesto Rivas & María Ángeles Martín-Lara & Gabriel Blázquez & Antonio Pérez & Mónica Calero, 2019. "Column Leaching Tests to Valorize a Solid Waste from the Decommissioning of Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Erwan Hermawan & Usman Sudjadi, 2022. "Integrated Nuclear-Renewable Energy System for Industrialization in West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia: Economic, Potential Site, and Policy Recommendation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 146-159, July.
    6. Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Lund, Henrik & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Sorknæs, Peter & Nielsen, Steffen & Madsen, Poul Thøis & Andresen, Gorm Bruun, 2024. "Cost and system effects of nuclear power in carbon-neutral energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    7. Ekaterina Sokolova & Khashayar Sadeghi & Seyed Hadi Ghazaie & Dario Barsi & Francesca Satta & Pietro Zunino, 2022. "Feasibility of Hybrid Desalination Plants Coupled with Small Gas Turbine CHP Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Wealer, B. & Bauer, S. & Hirschhausen, C.v. & Kemfert, C. & Göke, L., 2021. "Investing into third generation nuclear power plants - Review of recent trends and analysis of future investments using Monte Carlo Simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Qu, Chunzi & Bang, Rasmus Noss, 2023. "Comparative Investment Analysis of Wind and Nuclear Energy: Assessing the Impact of Changes in the Electricity Mix and Required Government Support for Investment Parity," Discussion Papers 2023/8, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    10. Liu, Yanyan & Huang, Guohe & Chen, Jiapei & Zhang, Xiaoyue & Zheng, Xiaogui & Zhai, Mengyu, 2022. "Development of an optimization-aided small modular reactor siting model – A case study of Saskatchewan, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    11. Nian, Victor & Mignacca, Benito & Locatelli, Giorgio, 2022. "Policies toward net-zero: Benchmarking the economic competitiveness of nuclear against wind and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    12. Gardumi, F. & Keppo, I. & Howells, M. & Pye, S. & Avgerinopoulos, G. & Lekavičius, V. & Galinis, A. & Martišauskas, L. & Fahl, U. & Korkmaz, P. & Schmid, D. & Montenegro, R. Cunha & Syri, S. & Hast, A, 2022. "Carrying out a multi-model integrated assessment of European energy transition pathways: Challenges and benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    13. Jianhui Wu & Jingen Chen & Chunyan Zou & Xiaoxiao Li, 2022. "Accident Modeling and Analysis of Nuclear Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-3, August.
    14. Ji Su Kang & Jae Hak Cheong, 2020. "Characteristics of Radioactive Effluent Releases from Pressurized Water Reactors after Permanent Shutdown," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Xie, Guo & Sun, Licheng & Yan, Tiantong & Tang, Jiguo & Bao, Jingjing & Du, Min, 2018. "Model development and experimental verification for tubular solar still operating under vacuum condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 115-130.
    16. Qiu, Leilei & Liao, Shengyong & Fan, Sui & Sun, Peiwei & Wei, Xinyu, 2023. "Dynamic modelling and control system design of micro-high-temperature gas-cooled reactor with helium brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    17. Elaheh Shobeiri & Filippo Genco & Daniel Hoornweg & Akira Tokuhiro, 2023. "Small Modular Reactor Deployment and Obstacles to Be Overcome," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Andersen, Anders N. & Sorknæs, Peter, 2022. "The business-economic energy system modelling tool energyPRO," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    19. Li, Zhen & Qi, Mingliang & Wang, Renlong & Yan, Xuesong & Yang, Yangyang & Gao, Mingang, 2024. "A novel cost analysis method for accelerator driven advanced nuclear energy system (ADANES) considering uncertainty throughout the R&D cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    20. Anna Grzegórska & Piotr Rybarczyk & Valdas Lukoševičius & Joanna Sobczak & Andrzej Rogala, 2021. "Smart Asset Management for District Heating Systems in the Baltic Sea Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5006-:d:418020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.