IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i15p3916-d393052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High-Resolution Structure-from-Motion for Quantitative Measurement of Leading-Edge Roughness

Author

Listed:
  • Mikkel Schou Nielsen

    (Danish Fundamental Metrology, Kogle Allé 5, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark)

  • Ivan Nikolov

    (Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Emil Krog Kruse

    (Power Curve ApS: Kastetvej 2, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Jørgen Garnæs

    (Danish Fundamental Metrology, Kogle Allé 5, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark)

  • Claus Brøndgaard Madsen

    (Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark)

Abstract

Over time, erosion of the leading edge of wind turbine blades increases the leading-edge roughness (LER). This may reduce the aerodynamic performance of the blade and hence the annual energy production of the wind turbine. As early detection is key for cost-effective maintenance, inspection methods are needed to quantify the LER of the blade. The aim of this proof-of-principle study is to determine whether high-resolution Structure-from-Motion (SfM) has the sufficient resolution and accuracy for quantitative inspection of LER. SfM provides 3D reconstruction of an object geometry using overlapping images of the object acquired with an RGB camera. Using information of the camera positions and orientations, absolute scale of the reconstruction can be achieved. Combined with a UAV platform, SfM has the potential for remote blade inspections with a reduced downtime. The tip of a decommissioned blade with an artificially enhanced erosion was used for the measurements. For validation, replica molding was used to transfer areas-of-interest to the lab for reference measurements using confocal microscopy. The SfM reconstruction resulted in a spatial resolution of 1 mm as well as a sub-mm accuracy in both the RMS surface roughness and the size of topographic features. In conclusion, high-resolution SfM demonstrated a successful quantitative reconstruction of LER.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikkel Schou Nielsen & Ivan Nikolov & Emil Krog Kruse & Jørgen Garnæs & Claus Brøndgaard Madsen, 2020. "High-Resolution Structure-from-Motion for Quantitative Measurement of Leading-Edge Roughness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3916-:d:393052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3916/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3916/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ASM Shihavuddin & Xiao Chen & Vladimir Fedorov & Anders Nymark Christensen & Nicolai Andre Brogaard Riis & Kim Branner & Anders Bjorholm Dahl & Rasmus Reinhold Paulsen, 2019. "Wind Turbine Surface Damage Detection by Deep Learning Aided Drone Inspection Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Matthias Schramm & Hamid Rahimi & Bernhard Stoevesandt & Kim Tangager, 2017. "The Influence of Eroded Blades on Wind Turbine Performance Using Numerical Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Kyoungboo Yang, 2020. "Geometry Design Optimization of a Wind Turbine Blade Considering Effects on Aerodynamic Performance by Linearization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Jannie S. Nielsen & John D. Sørensen, 2017. "Bayesian Estimation of Remaining Useful Life for Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Pierre Tchakoua & René Wamkeue & Mohand Ouhrouche & Fouad Slaoui-Hasnaoui & Tommy Andy Tameghe & Gabriel Ekemb, 2014. "Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: State-of-the-Art Review, New Trends, and Future Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-36, April.
    6. Han, Woobeom & Kim, Jonghwa & Kim, Bumsuk, 2018. "Effects of contamination and erosion at the leading edge of blade tip airfoils on the annual energy production of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 817-823.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Campobasso, M. & Castorrini, Alessio & Ortolani, Andrea & Minisci, Edmondo, 2023. "Probabilistic analysis of wind turbine performance degradation due to blade erosion accounting for uncertainty of damage geometry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Gregory Duthé & Imad Abdallah & Sarah Barber & Eleni Chatzi, 2021. "Modeling and Monitoring Erosion of the Leading Edge of Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-33, November.
    3. Castorrini, Alessio & Ortolani, Andrea & Campobasso, M. Sergio, 2023. "Assessing the progression of wind turbine energy yield losses due to blade erosion by resolving damage geometries from lab tests and field observations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Verma, Amrit Shankar & Yan, Jiquan & Hu, Weifei & Jiang, Zhiyu & Shi, Wei & Teuwen, Julie J.E., 2023. "A review of impact loads on composite wind turbine blades: Impact threats and classification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Wenjie Wang & Yu Xue & Chengkuan He & Yongnian Zhao, 2022. "Review of the Typical Damage and Damage-Detection Methods of Large Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, August.
    6. Jeanie A. Aird & Rebecca J. Barthelmie & Sara C. Pryor, 2023. "Automated Quantification of Wind Turbine Blade Leading Edge Erosion from Field Images," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    7. López, Javier Contreras & Kolios, Athanasios & Wang, Lin & Chiachio, Manuel, 2023. "A wind turbine blade leading edge rain erosion computational framework," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 131-141.
    8. Papi, Francesco & Balduzzi, Francesco & Ferrara, Giovanni & Bianchini, Alessandro, 2021. "Uncertainty quantification on the effects of rain-induced erosion on annual energy production and performance of a Multi-MW wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 701-715.
    9. Alfredo Alcayde & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & David Muñoz-Rodríguez & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2022. "Worldwide Research Trends on Optimizing Wind Turbine Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-7, September.
    10. Masoud Asgarpour & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2018. "Bayesian Based Diagnostic Model for Condition Based Maintenance of Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Yuri Merizalde & Luis Hernández-Callejo & Oscar Duque-Perez & Víctor Alonso-Gómez, 2019. "Maintenance Models Applied to Wind Turbines. A Comprehensive Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-41, January.
    12. Liu, Y. & Hajj, M. & Bao, Y., 2022. "Review of robot-based damage assessment for offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Francesco Papi & Lorenzo Cappugi & Simone Salvadori & Mauro Carnevale & Alessandro Bianchini, 2020. "Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Blade Damage on the Actual Energy Production of Modern Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Chen, Xuejun & Yang, Yongming & Cui, Zhixin & Shen, Jun, 2019. "Vibration fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on variational mode decomposition and energy entropy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1100-1109.
    15. Habibi, Hamed & Howard, Ian & Simani, Silvio, 2019. "Reliability improvement of wind turbine power generation using model-based fault detection and fault tolerant control: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 877-896.
    16. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    17. Arkaitz Rabanal & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Unai Elosegui, 2018. "MIDAS: A Benchmarking Multi-Criteria Method for the Identification of Defective Anemometers in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Deshun Li & Ting He & Qing Wang, 2023. "Experimental Research on the Effect of Particle Parameters on Dynamic Stall Characteristics of the Wind Turbine Airfoil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Marcin Witczak & Marcin Mrugalski & Bogdan Lipiec, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of MOSFETs via the Takagi–Sugeno Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Przemyslaw Baranski & Piotr Pietrzak, 2016. "Computational Effective Fault Detection by Means of Signature Functions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:15:p:3916-:d:393052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.