IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i12p3075-d371263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High-Efficiency Bioenergy Carbon Capture Integrating Chemical Looping Combustion with Oxygen Uncoupling and a Large Cogeneration Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Jussi Saari

    (School of Energy Systems, Energy Technology, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Petteri Peltola

    (School of Energy Systems, Energy Technology, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Tero Tynjälä

    (School of Energy Systems, Energy Technology, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Timo Hyppänen

    (School of Energy Systems, Energy Technology, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Juha Kaikko

    (School of Energy Systems, Energy Technology, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Esa Vakkilainen

    (School of Energy Systems, Energy Technology, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53850 Lappeenranta, Finland)

Abstract

Bioenergy with CO 2 capture and storage (BECCS) is a promising negative emission technology (NET). When using sustainably produced biomass as fuel, BECCS allows the production of power and heat with negative CO 2 emissions. The main technical challenges hindering the deployment of BECCS technologies include energy penalties associated with the capture process. This work evaluates the performance of an advanced CO 2 capture technology, chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU), in conjunction with biomass-fired combined heat and power (CHP) generation. Results from a MATLAB/Simulink reactor model were incorporated in a plant and integration model developed in a commercial process simulation software to quantify the key performance indicators of the CLOU-integrated CHP plant. Both energy and exergy analysis were conducted. The results show a remarkably low efficiency penalty of 0.7% compared to a conventional reference plant, and a high carbon capture efficiency of 97%. The low efficiency penalty is due to the high moisture and hydrogen contents of the biomass, and the separation of combustion products and excess air streams in the CLOU process; these together provide an opportunity to recover a significant amount of heat by flue gas condensation at a higher temperature level than what is possible in a conventional boiler. The condensing heat recovery yields an 18 MW generator power increase (3 MW loss in net power output) for the CLOU plant; in the reference plant with conventional boiler, the same scheme could achieve an increase of 9 MW (generator) and a decrease of 8 MW (net).

Suggested Citation

  • Jussi Saari & Petteri Peltola & Tero Tynjälä & Timo Hyppänen & Juha Kaikko & Esa Vakkilainen, 2020. "High-Efficiency Bioenergy Carbon Capture Integrating Chemical Looping Combustion with Oxygen Uncoupling and a Large Cogeneration Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3075-:d:371263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gładysz, Paweł & Saari, Jussi & Czarnowska, Lucyna, 2020. "Thermo-ecological cost analysis of cogeneration and polygeneration energy systems - Case study for thermal conversion of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1748-1760.
    2. Spinelli, Maurizio & Peltola, Petteri & Bischi, Aldo & Ritvanen, Jouni & Hyppänen, Timo & Romano, Matteo C., 2016. "Process integration of chemical looping combustion with oxygen uncoupling in a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 646-659.
    3. Sara Restrepo-Valencia & Arnaldo Walter, 2019. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage Systems in a Typical Sugarcane Mill in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Clayton, Christopher K. & Whitty, Kevin J., 2014. "Measurement and modeling of decomposition kinetics for copper oxide-based chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 416-423.
    5. Mendiara, T. & García-Labiano, F. & Abad, A. & Gayán, P. & de Diego, L.F. & Izquierdo, M.T. & Adánez, J., 2018. "Negative CO2 emissions through the use of biofuels in chemical looping technology: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 657-684.
    6. Amanda D. Cuellar & Howard Herzog, 2015. "A Path Forward for Low Carbon Power from Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Najmus S. Sifat & Yousef Haseli, 2019. "A Critical Review of CO 2 Capture Technologies and Prospects for Clean Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    8. Gibbins, Jon & Chalmers, Hannah, 2008. "Carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4317-4322, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomasz Czakiert & Jaroslaw Krzywanski & Anna Zylka & Wojciech Nowak, 2022. "Chemical Looping Combustion: A Brief Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Jussi Saari & Petteri Peltola & Katja Kuparinen & Juha Kaikko & Ekaterina Sermyagina & Esa Vakkilainen, 2023. "Novel BECCS implementation integrating chemical looping combustion with oxygen uncoupling and a kraft pulp mill cogeneration plant," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Jussi Saari & Ekaterina Sermyagina & Juha Kaikko & Markus Haider & Marcelo Hamaguchi & Esa Vakkilainen, 2021. "Evaluation of the Energy Efficiency Improvement Potential through Back-End Heat Recovery in the Kraft Recovery Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Paweł Ziółkowski & Paweł Madejski & Milad Amiri & Tomasz Kuś & Kamil Stasiak & Navaneethan Subramanian & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Janusz Badur & Łukasz Niedźwiecki & Dariusz Mikielewicz, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of Negative CO 2 Emission Power Plant Using Aspen Plus, Aspen Hysys, and Ebsilon Software," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peltola, Petteri & Saari, Jussi & Tynjälä, Tero & Hyppänen, Timo, 2020. "Process integration of chemical looping combustion with oxygen uncoupling in a biomass-fired combined heat and power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Paweł Ziółkowski & Paweł Madejski & Milad Amiri & Tomasz Kuś & Kamil Stasiak & Navaneethan Subramanian & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Janusz Badur & Łukasz Niedźwiecki & Dariusz Mikielewicz, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of Negative CO 2 Emission Power Plant Using Aspen Plus, Aspen Hysys, and Ebsilon Software," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Jussi Saari & Petteri Peltola & Katja Kuparinen & Juha Kaikko & Ekaterina Sermyagina & Esa Vakkilainen, 2023. "Novel BECCS implementation integrating chemical looping combustion with oxygen uncoupling and a kraft pulp mill cogeneration plant," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Muhammad Nawaz & Humbul Suleman & Abdulhalim Shah Maulud, 2022. "Carbon Capture and Utilization: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2007–2021," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Tomasz Czakiert & Jaroslaw Krzywanski & Anna Zylka & Wojciech Nowak, 2022. "Chemical Looping Combustion: A Brief Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Paweł Gładysz & Anna Sowiżdżał & Maciej Miecznik & Maciej Hacaga & Leszek Pająk, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of a Combined Heat and Power Plant Integrated with Carbon Dioxide Removal Technology: A Case Study for Central Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-34, June.
    7. Federica Cucchiella & Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2015. "Industrial Photovoltaic Systems: An Economic Analysis in Non-Subsidized Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Setiawan, Andri D. & Cuppen, Eefje, 2013. "Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1188-1199.
    9. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    10. Subramanian, Navaneethan & Madejski, Paweł, 2023. "Analysis of CO2 capture process from flue-gases in combined cycle gas turbine power plant using post-combustion capture technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Christian Leßmann & Arne Steinkraus, 2016. "Kurz zum Klima: »Carbon Capture and Storage« – was kostet die Emissionsvermeidung?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(05), pages 51-54, March.
    13. Raghava Rao Kommalapati & Iqbal Hossan & Venkata Sai Vamsi Botlaguduru & Hongbo Du & Ziaul Huque, 2018. "Life Cycle Environmental Impact of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at a Power Plant in the Greater Houston Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Aydin, Gokhan & Karakurt, Izzet & Aydiner, Kerim, 2010. "Evaluation of geologic storage options of CO2: Applicability, cost, storage capacity and safety," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5072-5080, September.
    15. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    16. Stewart Russell & Nils Markusson & Vivian Scott, 2012. "What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 651-668, August.
    17. Huang, Jiangfeng & Khan, Muhammad Tahir & Perecin, Danilo & Coelho, Suani T. & Zhang, Muqing, 2020. "Sugarcane for bioethanol production: Potential of bagasse in Chinese perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Theppitak, Sarut & Hungwe, Douglas & Ding, Lu & Xin, Dai & Yu, Guangsuo & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2020. "Comparison on solid biofuel production from wet and dry carbonization processes of food wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    19. Iñaki Adánez-Rubio & Antón Pérez-Astray & Alberto Abad & Pilar Gayán & Luis F. Diego & Juan Adánez, 2019. "Chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling: an advanced biomass combustion technology to avoid CO2 emissions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 1293-1306, October.
    20. Lin, Chih-Wei & Nazeri, Mahmoud & Bhattacharji, Ayan & Spicer, George & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2016. "Apparatus and method for calibrating a Coriolis mass flow meter for carbon dioxide at pressure and temperature conditions represented to CCS pipeline operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 759-764.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3075-:d:371263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.