IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i11p2918-d368230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Study on the Heat Exchange Mechanism in a Simulated Self-Circulation Wellbore

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Zhang

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
    Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Development, China University of Petroleum (East China), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Songhe Geng

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
    Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Development, China University of Petroleum (East China), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Jun Kang

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
    Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Development, China University of Petroleum (East China), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Jiahao Chao

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
    Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Development, China University of Petroleum (East China), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Linchao Yang

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
    Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Development, China University of Petroleum (East China), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Fangping Yan

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Chengde Petroleum College, Chengde 067000, China)

Abstract

Self-circulation wellbore is a new technique for geothermal development in hot dry rocks (HDR), which uses a U-shape channel composed of tubing and casing as the heat exchanger. In this study, a self-circulation wellbore in HDR on a laboratory scale was built, and a serial of experiments were conducted to investigate the heat exchange law and the influencing factors on the heat mining rate of the wellbore. A similarity analysis was also made to estimate the heat-mining capacity of the wellbore on a field scale. The experimental results show that the large thermal conductivity and heat capacity of granite with high temperature can contribute to a large heat-mining rate. A high injection rate can cause a high convective heat transfer coefficient in wellbore, while a balance is needed between the heat mining rate and the outlet temperature. An inner tubing with low thermal conductivity can significantly reduce the heat loss to the casing annulus. The similarity analysis indicates that a heat mining rate of 1.25 MW can be reached when using a 2000 m long horizontal well section in a 150 °C HDR reservoir with a circulation rate of 602.8 m 3 /day. This result is well corresponding to the published data.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Zhang & Songhe Geng & Jun Kang & Jiahao Chao & Linchao Yang & Fangping Yan, 2020. "Experimental Study on the Heat Exchange Mechanism in a Simulated Self-Circulation Wellbore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:2918-:d:368230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2918/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2918/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beier, Richard A. & Acuña, José & Mogensen, Palne & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Borehole resistance and vertical temperature profiles in coaxial borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 665-675.
    2. Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Li, Dexiang & Pei, Jingjing & Ren, Shaoran, 2014. "Potential assessment of CO2 injection for heat mining and geological storage in geothermal reservoirs of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 237-246.
    3. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Evaluation of geothermal heating from abandoned oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 592-607.
    4. Gordon, David & Bolisetti, Tirupati & Ting, David S-K. & Reitsma, Stanley, 2018. "Experimental and analytical investigation on pipe sizes for a coaxial borehole heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 946-953.
    5. Kujawa, Tomasz & Nowak, Władysław & Stachel, Aleksander A., 2006. "Utilization of existing deep geological wells for acquisitions of geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 650-664.
    6. Zanchini, E. & Lazzari, S. & Priarone, A., 2010. "Effects of flow direction and thermal short-circuiting on the performance of small coaxial ground heat exchangers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1255-1265.
    7. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    8. Dai, Chuanshan & Li, Jiashu & Shi, Yu & Zeng, Long & Lei, Haiyan, 2019. "An experiment on heat extraction from a deep geothermal well using a downhole coaxial open loop design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Cheng, Wen-Long & Liu, Jian & Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Chang-Long, 2016. "Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 537-545.
    10. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Enechukwu, Chioma & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Rui, 2017. "Geothermal exploitation from hot dry rocks via recycling heat transmission fluid in a horizontal well," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 366-377.
    11. Wang, Yi & Zhang, Liang & Cui, Guodong & Kang, Jun & Ren, Shaoran, 2019. "Geothermal development and power generation by circulating water and isobutane via a closed-loop horizontal well from hot dry rocks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 909-922.
    12. Haraden, John, 1992. "The status of hot dry rock as an energy source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 17(8), pages 777-786.
    13. Holmberg, Henrik & Acuña, José & Næss, Erling & Sønju, Otto K., 2016. "Thermal evaluation of coaxial deep borehole heat exchangers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 65-76.
    14. Cheng, Wen-Long & Li, Tong-Tong & Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Chang-Long, 2013. "Studies on geothermal power generation using abandoned oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 248-254.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Liang & Yang, Linchao & Geng, Songhe & Wen, Ronghua & He, Chuan & Liang, Yuzhu & Yang, Hongbin, 2022. "Numerical simulation on the heat extraction from the porous medium-low temperature geothermal reservoirs by self-circulation wellbore and its enhanced methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1009-1025.
    2. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2021. "Retrofitting abandoned petroleum wells as doublet deep borehole heat exchangers for geothermal energy production—a numerical investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 115-134.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen Zhao & Guangxiong Qin & Huijuan Chen & Linchao Yang & Songhe Geng & Ronghua Wen & Liang Zhang, 2022. "Numerical Simulation and Economic Evaluation of Wellbore Self-Circulation for Heat Extraction Using Cluster Horizontal Wells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Bu, Xianbiao & Ran, Yunmin & Zhang, Dongdong, 2019. "Experimental and simulation studies of geothermal single well for building heating," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1902-1909.
    3. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Wu, Linping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2020. "Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1110-1123.
    4. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    5. Sun, Fengrui & Yao, Yuedong & Li, Guozhen & Li, Xiangfang, 2018. "Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 760-773.
    6. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2021. "Retrofitting abandoned petroleum wells as doublet deep borehole heat exchangers for geothermal energy production—a numerical investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 115-134.
    7. Zhang, Liang & Yang, Linchao & Geng, Songhe & Wen, Ronghua & He, Chuan & Liang, Yuzhu & Yang, Hongbin, 2022. "Numerical simulation on the heat extraction from the porous medium-low temperature geothermal reservoirs by self-circulation wellbore and its enhanced methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1009-1025.
    8. Wang, Yi & Zhang, Liang & Cui, Guodong & Kang, Jun & Ren, Shaoran, 2019. "Geothermal development and power generation by circulating water and isobutane via a closed-loop horizontal well from hot dry rocks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 909-922.
    9. Luo, Yongqaing & Guo, Hongshan & Meggers, Forrest & Zhang, Ling, 2019. "Deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger: Analytical modeling and thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1298-1313.
    10. Tang, Hewei & Xu, Boyue & Hasan, A. Rashid & Sun, Zhuang & Killough, John, 2019. "Modeling wellbore heat exchangers: Fully numerical to fully analytical solutions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1124-1135.
    11. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Huang, Guangping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2021. "Effects of temperature-dependent property variations on the output capacity prediction of a deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 334-349.
    12. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    13. Al Saedi, A.Q. & Sharma, P. & Kabir, C.S., 2021. "A novel cyclical wellbore-fluid circulation strategy for extracting geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. Xie, Kun & Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Analysis and optimization of underground thermal energy storage using depleted oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1006-1016.
    15. Hou, Xinglan & Zhong, Xiuping & Nie, Shuaishuai & Wang, Yafei & Tu, Guigang & Ma, Yingrui & Liu, Kunyan & Chen, Chen, 2024. "Study on the heat recovery behavior of horizontal well systems in the Qiabuqia geothermal area of the Gonghe Basin, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    16. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Evaluation of geothermal heating from abandoned oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 592-607.
    17. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Wang, Ming, 2023. "Heat extraction performance evaluation of U-shaped well geothermal production system under different well-layout parameters and engineering schemes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 473-484.
    18. Peng Li & Peng Guan & Jun Zheng & Bin Dou & Hong Tian & Xinsheng Duan & Hejuan Liu, 2020. "Field Test and Numerical Simulation on Heat Transfer Performance of Coaxial Borehole Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Gharibi, Shabnam & Mortezazadeh, Emad & Hashemi Aghcheh Bodi, Seyed Jalaledin & Vatani, Ali, 2018. "Feasibility study of geothermal heat extraction from abandoned oil wells using a U-tube heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 554-567.
    20. Qiao, Mingzheng & Jing, Zefeng & Feng, Chenchen & Li, Minghui & Chen, Cheng & Zou, Xupeng & Zhou, Yujuan, 2024. "Review on heat extraction systems of hot dry rock: Classifications, benefits, limitations, research status and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:2918-:d:368230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.