IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i9p1588-d226085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighted Regression-Based Extremum Response Surface Method for Structural Dynamic Fuzzy Reliability Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Lu

    (School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China)

  • Yun-Wen Feng

    (School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China)

  • Cheng-Wei Fei

    (Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

The parameters considered in structural dynamic reliability analysis have strong uncertainties during machinery operation, and affect analytical precision and efficiency. To improve structural dynamic fuzzy reliability analysis, we propose the weighted regression-based extremum response surface method (WR-ERSM) based on extremum response surface method (ERSM) and weighted regression (WR), by considering the randomness of design parameters and the fuzziness of the safety criterion. Therein, we utilize the ERSM to process the transient to improve computational efficiency, by transforming the random process of structural output response into a random variable. We employ the WR to find the efficient samples with larger weights to improve the calculative accuracy. The fuzziness of the safety criterion is regarded to improve computational precision in the WR-ERSM. The WR-ERSM is applied to perform the dynamic fuzzy reliability analysis of an aeroengine turbine blisk with the fluid-structure coupling technique, and is verified by the comparison of the Monte Carlo (MC) method, equivalent stochastic transformation method (ESTM) and ERSM, with the emphasis on model-fitting property and simulation performance. As revealed from this investigation, (1) the ERSM has the capacity of processing the transient of the structural dynamic reliability evaluation, and (2) the WR approach is able to improve modeling accuracy, and (3) regarding the fuzzy safety criterion is promising to improve the precision of structural dynamic fuzzy reliability evaluation, and (4) the change rule of turbine blisk structural stress from start to cruise for the aircraft is acquired with the maximum value of structural stress at t = 165 s and the reliability degree ( Pr = 0.997) of turbine blisk. The proposed WR-ERSM can improve the efficiency and precision of structural dynamic reliability analysis. Therefore, the efforts of this study provide a promising method for structural dynamic reliability evaluation with respect to working processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Lu & Yun-Wen Feng & Cheng-Wei Fei, 2019. "Weighted Regression-Based Extremum Response Surface Method for Structural Dynamic Fuzzy Reliability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1588-:d:226085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1588/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1588/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan A. Martinez-Velasco & Gerardo Guerra, 2016. "Reliability Analysis of Distribution Systems with Photovoltaic Generation Using a Power Flow Simulator and a Parallel Monte Carlo Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Ravi Anant Kishore & Roop L. Mahajan & Shashank Priya, 2018. "Combinatory Finite Element and Artificial Neural Network Model for Predicting Performance of Thermoelectric Generator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Zia-ur-Rehman Gondal & Jongsoo Lee, 2012. "Reliability assessment using feed-forward neural network-based approximate meta-models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(5), pages 448-454, October.
    4. Meng Zhang & Shan Lu, 2014. "A reliability model of blade to avoid resonance considering multiple fuzziness," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(6), pages 641-652, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fitsum Salehu Kebede & Jean-Christophe Olivier & Salvy Bourguet & Mohamed Machmoum, 2021. "Reliability Evaluation of Renewable Power Systems through Distribution Network Power Outage Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Dai, Hongzhe & Zhang, Boyi & Wang, Wei, 2015. "A multiwavelet support vector regression method for efficient reliability assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 132-139.
    3. Demeke, Wabi & Ryu, Byungki & Ryu, Seunghwa, 2024. "Machine learning-based optimization of segmented thermoelectric power generators using temperature-dependent performance properties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    4. Zain Anwer Memon & Riccardo Trinchero & Paolo Manfredi & Flavio Canavero & Igor S. Stievano, 2020. "Compressed Machine Learning Models for the Uncertainty Quantification of Power Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Yih-Der Lee & Jheng-Lun Jiang & Yuan-Hsiang Ho & Wei-Chen Lin & Hsin-Ching Chih & Wei-Tzer Huang, 2020. "Neutral Current Reduction in Three-Phase Four-Wire Distribution Feeders by Optimal Phase Arrangement Based on a Full-Scale Net Load Model Derived from the FTU Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Tae Young Kim, 2021. "Prediction of System-Level Energy Harvesting Characteristics of a Thermoelectric Generator Operating in a Diesel Engine Using Artificial Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Miroslaw Parol & Jacek Wasilewski & Tomasz Wojtowicz & Bartlomiej Arendarski & Przemyslaw Komarnicki, 2022. "Reliability Analysis of MV Electric Distribution Networks Including Distributed Generation and ICT Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-34, July.
    8. Nuria Novas & Alfredo Alcayde & Isabel Robalo & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro & Francisco G. Montoya, 2020. "Energies and Its Worldwide Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-41, December.
    9. Maduabuchi, Chika, 2022. "Thermo-mechanical optimization of thermoelectric generators using deep learning artificial intelligence algorithms fed with verified finite element simulation data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    10. Mike Brian Ndawula & Sasa Z. Djokic & Ignacio Hernando-Gil, 2019. "Reliability Enhancement in Power Networks under Uncertainty from Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Mimica, Marko & Giménez de Urtasun, Laura & Krajačić, Goran, 2022. "A robust risk assessment method for energy planning scenarios on smart islands under the demand uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    12. Jose L. López-Prado & Jorge I. Vélez & Guisselle A. Garcia-Llinás, 2020. "Reliability Evaluation in Distribution Networks with Microgrids: Review and Classification of the Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-31, November.
    13. Chika Maduabuchi & Hassan Fagehi & Ibrahim Alatawi & Mohammad Alkhedher, 2022. "Predicting the Optimal Performance of a Concentrated Solar Segmented Variable Leg Thermoelectric Generator Using Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
    14. Maduabuchi, Chika & Eneh, Chibuoke & Alrobaian, Abdulrahman Abdullah & Alkhedher, Mohammad, 2023. "Deep neural networks for quick and precise geometry optimization of segmented thermoelectric generators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    15. Navneet Singh Bhangu & G. L. Pahuja & Rupinder Singh, 2017. "Enhancing reliability of thermal power plant by implementing RCM policy and developing reliability prediction model: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1923-1936, November.
    16. Ziad M. Ali & Martin Calasan & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem & Francisco Jurado & Foad H. Gandoman, 2023. "Applications of Energy Storage Systems in Enhancing Energy Management and Access in Microgrids: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-41, August.
    17. Fink, Olga & Zio, Enrico & Weidmann, Ulrich, 2014. "Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 198-206.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1588-:d:226085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.