IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i5p957-d213284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Variable Productivity Ratios for Improving Large Scale Spatially Explicit Pruning Biomass Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel García-Galindo

    (Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption (CIRCE), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Arkadiusz Dyjakon

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Fernando Cay Villa-Ceballos

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

Biomass assessments of agro–residues performed at large geographical scales generally base calculations on single constant pruning productivity ratios (RSRs). Reliability of biomass assessments shall be improved if RSRs respond to prevailing regional crop growing conditions. The present paper describes the methodology applied to create geographically varying pruning RSR ratios–tons of dry matter per hectare—for five crop groups: vineyard, olive, fruit species, citrus and dry fruits. A newly created database containing 230 records–from seven EU28 countries—is submitted to statistical analysis. Results reveal that agro-climatic conditions are able to explain a not negligible share of the pruning productivity as dependent variable. Subsequent regression analysis provides two equations—for vineyard and citrus—achieving a reasonable good fitting ( R 2 0.18 and 0.42 respectively) between RSR and the agroclimatic variables. Analysis of olive, fruit species and dry fruits scatter and whisker plots were useful for zoning and inducing ramp functions. A Geographical Information System (GIS) was utilised to apply the functions to the agroclimatic raster coverages in order to obtain RSR raster grids. Zonal statistic procedures applied by European regional units (NUTs0, NUTs2, NUTs3) provide a specific crop RSR ratio per administrative unit as a principal output of the present work.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel García-Galindo & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Fernando Cay Villa-Ceballos, 2019. "Building Variable Productivity Ratios for Improving Large Scale Spatially Explicit Pruning Biomass Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:957-:d:213284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/957/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/957/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberts, Justo José & Cassula, Agnelo Marotta & Osvaldo Prado, Pedro & Dias, Rubens Alves & Balestieri, José Antonio Perrella, 2015. "Assessment of dry residual biomass potential for use as alternative energy source in the party of General Pueyrredón, Argentina," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 568-583.
    2. Zomer, Robert J. & Bossio, Deborah A. & Trabucco, Antonio & Yuanjie, Li & Gupta, Diwan C. & Singh, Virendra P., 2007. "Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in Northern India," IWMI Research Reports 53067, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Zomer, Robert J. & Bossio, Deborah A. & Trabucco, Antonio & Yuanjie, Li & Gupta, Diwan C. & Singh, Virendra P., 2007. "Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in Northern India," IWMI Research Reports H041069, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2018. "Harvesting and Baling of Pruned Biomass in Apple Orchards for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Holmatov, B. & Schyns, J.F. & Krol, M.S. & Gerbens-Leenes, P.W. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2021. "Can crop residues provide fuel for future transport? Limited global residue bioethanol potentials and large associated land, water and carbon footprints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Daniel García-Galindo, 2019. "Implementing Agricultural Pruning to Energy in Europe: Technical, Economic and Implementation Potentials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni & Alessandro Suardi & Vincenzo Alfano & Simone Bergonzoli & Nadia Palmieri & Luigi Pari, 2020. "A GIS Approach to Locate a Small Size Biomass Plant Powered by Olive Pruning and to Estimate Supply Chain Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Biljana Kulišić & Tajana Radić & Mario Njavro, 2020. "Agro-Pruning for Energy as a Link between Rural Development and Clean Energy Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Alessandro Suardi & Francesco Latterini & Vincenzo Alfano & Nadia Palmieri & Simone Bergonzoli & Emmanouil Karampinis & Michael Alexandros Kougioumtzis & Panagiotis Grammelis & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Machine Performance and Hog Fuel Quality Evaluation in Olive Tree Pruning Harvesting Conducted Using a Towed Shredder on Flat and Hilly Fields," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evan Girvetz & Chris Zganjar, 2014. "Dissecting indices of aridity for assessing the impacts of global climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 469-483, October.
    2. Hagos, Fitsum & Makombe, Godswill & Namara, Regassa & Awulachew, Seleshi Bekele, 2008. "Importance of irrigated agriculture to the Ethiopian economy: capturing the direct net benefits of irrigation," IWMI Conference Proceedings 246409, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Gebregziabher, Gebrehaweria & Rebelo, Lisa-Maria & Notenbaert, A. & Ergano, K. & Abebe, Yenenesh, 2013. "Determinants of adoption of rainwater management technologies among farm households in the Nile River Basin," IWMI Reports 201008, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Herguido Sevillano, E. & Lavado Contador, J.F. & Schnabel, S. & Pulido, M. & Ibáñez, J., 2018. "Using spatial models of temporal tree dynamics to evaluate the implementation of EU afforestation policies in rangelands of SW Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 166-175.
    5. Richard Ackermann, 2012. "New Directions for Water Management in Indian Agriculture," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 4(2), pages 227-288, May.
    6. Giuseppe Badagliacca & Maurizio Romeo & Emilio Lo Presti & Antonio Gelsomino & Michele Monti, 2020. "Factors Governing Total and Permanganate Oxidizable C Pools in Agricultural Soils from Southern Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Stefano Biagetti & Debora Zurro & Jonas Alcaina-Mateos & Eugenio Bortolini & Marco Madella, 2021. "Quantitative Analysis of Drought Management Strategies across Ethnographically-Researched African Societies: A Pilot Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Jalal Kassout & Jean-Frederic Terral & John G Hodgson & Mohammed Ater, 2019. "Trait-based plant ecology a flawed tool in climate studies? The leaf traits of wild olive that pattern with climate are not those routinely measured," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Sanju John Thomas & Mukund Haribhau Bade & Sudhansu Sekhar Sahoo & Sheffy Thomas & Ajith Kumar & Mohamed M. Awad, 2022. "Urban Water Management with a Full Cost Recovery Policy: The Impact of Externalities on Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Zhang, Ping & Zhuo, La & Li, Meng & Liu, Yilin & Wu, Pute, 2023. "Assessment of advanced bioethanol potential under water and land resource constraints in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 359-371.
    12. Monika Słupska & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Roman Stopa, 2019. "Determination of Strength Properties of Energy Plants on the Example of Miscanthus × Giganteus , Rosa Multiflora and Salix Viminalis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    14. Singlitico, Alessandro & Goggins, Jamie & Monaghan, Rory F.D., 2018. "Evaluation of the potential and geospatial distribution of waste and residues for bio-SNG production: A case study for the Republic of Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 288-301.
    15. Nandimandalam, Hariteja & Gude, Veera Gnaneswar, 2022. "Renewable wood residue sources as potential alternative for fossil fuel dominated electricity mix for regions in Mississippi: A techno-economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1105-1119.
    16. Antonio Barragán-Escandón & Julio Terrados-Cepeda & Esteban Zalamea-León, 2017. "The Role of Renewable Energy in the Promotion of Circular Urban Metabolism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-29, December.
    17. Teresa Enes & José Aranha & Teresa Fonseca & Domingos Lopes & Ana Alves & José Lousada, 2019. "Thermal Properties of Residual Agroforestry Biomass of Northern Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    18. Siegrist, Armin & Bowman, Gillianne & Burg, Vanessa, 2022. "Energy generation potentials from agricultural residues: The influence of techno-spatial restrictions on biomethane, electricity, and heat production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    19. Chinnici, Gaetano & D’Amico, Mario & Rizzo, Marcella & Pecorino, Biagio, 2015. "Analysis of biomass availability for energy use in Sicily," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1025-1030.
    20. Bai, Attila & Durkó, Emília & Tar, Károly & Tóth, József Barnabás & Lázár, István & Kapocska, László & Kircsi, Andrea & Bartók, Blanka & Vass, Róbert & Pénzes, János & Tóth, Tamás, 2016. "Social and economic possibilities for the energy utilization of fitomass in the valley of the river Hernád," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 777-789.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:957-:d:213284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.