IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i3p542-d204578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Technologies for CO 2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Osk Gardarsdottir

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Department of Gas Technology, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Edoardo De Lena

    (Politecnico di Milano, Department of Energy, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Matteo Romano

    (Politecnico di Milano, Department of Energy, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Simon Roussanaly

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Department of Gas Technology, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Mari Voldsund

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Department of Gas Technology, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • José-Francisco Pérez-Calvo

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • David Berstad

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Department of Gas Technology, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Chao Fu

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Department of Gas Technology, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Rahul Anantharaman

    (SINTEF Energy Research, Department of Gas Technology, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Daniel Sutter

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Matteo Gazzani

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Energy and Resources, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Marco Mazzotti

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Giovanni Cinti

    (Italcementi Heidelberg Group, 24126 Bergamo, Italy)

Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO 2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO 2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO 2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO 2 avoided is between 42 €/t CO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/t CO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/t CO2 . Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO 2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Osk Gardarsdottir & Edoardo De Lena & Matteo Romano & Simon Roussanaly & Mari Voldsund & José-Francisco Pérez-Calvo & David Berstad & Chao Fu & Rahul Anantharaman & Daniel Sutter & Matteo Gaz, 2019. "Comparison of Technologies for CO 2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:542-:d:204578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Otavio Cavalett & Marcos D. B. Watanabe & Mari Voldsund & Simon Roussanaly & Francesco Cherubini, 2024. "Paving the way for sustainable decarbonization of the European cement industry," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 568-580, May.
    2. Biermann, Maximilian & Langner, Christian & Roussanaly, Simon & Normann, Fredrik & Harvey, Simon, 2022. "The role of energy supply in abatement cost curves for CO2 capture from process industry – A case study of a Swedish refinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    3. Subraveti, Sai Gokul & Roussanaly, Simon & Anantharaman, Rahul & Riboldi, Luca & Rajendran, Arvind, 2022. "How much can novel solid sorbents reduce the cost of post-combustion CO2 capture? A techno-economic investigation on the cost limits of pressure–vacuum swing adsorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    4. Martin Greco-Coppi & Carina Hofmann & Diethelm Walter & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2023. "Negative CO2 emissions in the lime production using an indirectly heated carbonate looping process," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Griffiths, Steve & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Foley, Aoife M. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Uratani, Joao M., 2023. "Decarbonizing the cement and concrete industry: A systematic review of socio-technical systems, technological innovations, and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Paweł Ziółkowski & Stanisław Głuch & Piotr Józef Ziółkowski & Janusz Badur, 2022. "Compact High Efficiency and Zero-Emission Gas-Fired Power Plant with Oxy-Combustion and Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-39, April.
    7. Simon Roussanaly & Han Deng & Geir Skaugen & Truls Gundersen, 2021. "At what Pressure Shall CO 2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Shen, Peiliang & Jiang, Yi & Zhang, Yangyang & Liu, Songhui & Xuan, Dongxing & Lu, Jianxin & Zhang, Shipeng & Poon, Chi Sun, 2023. "Production of aragonite whiskers by carbonation of fine recycled concrete wastes: An alternative pathway for efficient CO2 sequestration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Sun, Xiaolong & Alcalde, Juan & Bakhtbidar, Mahdi & Elío, Javier & Vilarrasa, Víctor & Canal, Jacobo & Ballesteros, Julio & Heinemann, Niklas & Haszeldine, Stuart & Cavanagh, Andrew & Vega-Maza, David, 2021. "Hubs and clusters approach to unlock the development of carbon capture and storage – Case study in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    10. Nhuchhen, Daya R. & Sit, Song P. & Layzell, David B., 2022. "Decarbonization of cement production in a hydrogen economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    11. Wang, Honglin & Liu, Yanrong & Laaksonen, Aatto & Krook-Riekkola, Anna & Yang, Zhuhong & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Carbon recycling – An immense resource and key to a smart climate engineering: A survey of technologies, cost and impurity impact," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Grzegorz Ludwik Golewski, 2021. "Green Concrete Based on Quaternary Binders with Significant Reduced of CO 2 Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Simoni, Marco & Wilkes, Mathew D. & Brown, Solomon & Provis, John L. & Kinoshita, Hajime & Hanein, Theodore, 2022. "Decarbonising the lime industry: State-of-the-art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:542-:d:204578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.