IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i18p3570-d268434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DAG-Based Distributed Ledger for Low-Latency Smart Grid Network

Author

Listed:
  • Seongjoon Park

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Hwangnam Kim

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a scheme that implements a Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) based on Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) to generate, validate, and confirm the electricity transaction in Smart Grid. The convergence of the Smart Grid and distributed ledger concept has recently been introduced. Since Smart Grids require a distributed network architecture for power distribution and trading, the Distributed Ledger-based Smart Grid design is a spotlighted research domain. However, only the Blockchain-based methods, which are a type of the distributed ledger scheme, are currently either being considered or adopted in the Smart Grid. Due to computation-intensive consensus schemes such as Proof-of-Work and discrete block generation, Blockchain-based distributed ledger systems suffer from efficiency and latency issues. We propose a DAG-based distributed ledger for Smart Grids, called PowerGraph, to resolve this problem. Since a DAG-based distributed ledger does not need to generate blocks for confirmation, each transaction of the PowerGraph undergoes the validation and confirmation process individually. In addition, transactions in PowerGraph are used to keep track of the energy trade and include various types of transactions so that they can fully encompass the events in the Smart Grid network. Finally, to ensure that PowerGraph maintains a high performance, we modeled the PowerGraph performance and proposed a novel consensus algorithm that would result in the rapid confirmation of transactions. We use numerical evaluations to show that PowerGraph can accelerate the transaction processing speed by over 5 times compared to existing DAG-based DLT system.

Suggested Citation

  • Seongjoon Park & Hwangnam Kim, 2019. "DAG-Based Distributed Ledger for Low-Latency Smart Grid Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3570-:d:268434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3570/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3570/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juhar Abdella & Khaled Shuaib, 2018. "Peer to Peer Distributed Energy Trading in Smart Grids: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Bae, Mungyu & Kim, Hwantae & Kim, Eugene & Chung, Albert Yongjoon & Kim, Hwangnam & Roh, Jae Hyung, 2014. "Toward electricity retail competition: Survey and case study on technical infrastructure for advanced electricity market system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 252-273.
    3. Seong-Kyu Kim & Jun-Ho Huh, 2018. "A Study on the Improvement of Smart Grid Security Performance and Blockchain Smart Grid Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiuli Wang & Fang Yao & Fushuan Wen, 2022. "Applications of Blockchain Technology in Modern Power Systems: A Brief Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Hamzah Khan & Tariq Masood, 2022. "Impact of Blockchain Technology on Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Nishant Sapra & Imlak Shaikh & Ashutosh Dash, 2023. "Impact of Proof of Work (PoW)-Based Blockchain Applications on the Environment: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gangjun Gong & Zhening Zhang & Xinyu Zhang & Nawaraj Kumar Mahato & Lin Liu & Chang Su & Haixia Yang, 2020. "Electric Power System Operation Mechanism with Energy Routers Based on QoS Index under Blockchain Architecture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Hartley, Peter R. & Medlock, Kenneth B. & Jankovska, Olivera, 2019. "Electricity reform and retail pricing in Texas," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Maria Malvoni & Kushal A. Prasad & Kabir A. Mamun & F.R. Islam & Shauhrat S. Chopra, 2020. "Distributed Energy Resources and the Application of AI, IoT, and Blockchain in Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-42, November.
    4. Sungwook Eom & Jun-Ho Huh, 2018. "The Opening Capability for Security against Privacy Infringements in the Smart Grid Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Asaad, Mohammad & Ahmad, Furkan & Alam, Mohammad Saad & Sarfraz, Mohammad, 2021. "Smart grid and Indian experience: A review," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Majidpour, Mostafa & Qiu, Charlie & Chu, Peter & Pota, Hemanshu R. & Gadh, Rajit, 2016. "Forecasting the EV charging load based on customer profile or station measurement?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 134-141.
    7. Ricardo Moreno & Cristian Hoyos & Sergio Cantillo, 2021. "A Framework from Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading Based on Communities Transactions," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 537-545.
    8. Temitayo O. Olowu & Aditya Sundararajan & Masood Moghaddami & Arif I. Sarwat, 2018. "Future Challenges and Mitigation Methods for High Photovoltaic Penetration: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-32, July.
    9. Yongxiu He & Meiyan Wang & Jinxiong Yu & Qing He & Huijun Sun & Fengyu Su, 2020. "Research on the Hybrid Recommendation Method of Retail Electricity Price Package Based on Power User Characteristics and Multi-Attribute Utility in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Matthew Gough & Sérgio F. Santos & Mohammed Javadi & Rui Castro & João P. S. Catalão, 2020. "Prosumer Flexibility: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review and Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, May.
    11. Pablo Baez-Gonzalez & Felix Garcia-Torres & Miguel A. Ridao & Carlos Bordons, 2020. "A Stochastic MPC Based Energy Management System for Simultaneous Participation in Continuous and Discrete Prosumer-to-Prosumer Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Arun S. Loganathan & Vijayapriya Ramachandran & Angalaeswari Sendraya Perumal & Seshathiri Dhanasekaran & Natrayan Lakshmaiya & Prabhu Paramasivam, 2022. "Framework of Transactive Energy Market Strategies for Lucrative Peer-to-Peer Energy Transactions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Alexandros-Georgios Chronis & Foivos Palaiogiannis & Iasonas Kouveliotis-Lysikatos & Panos Kotsampopoulos & Nikos Hatziargyriou, 2021. "Photovoltaics Enabling Sustainable Energy Communities: Technological Drivers and Emerging Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Tseng, Fang-Mei & Palma Gil, Eunice Ina N. & Lu, Louis Y.Y., 2021. "Developmental trajectories of blockchain research and its major subfields," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    15. Uyikumhe Damisa & Peter Olabisi Oluseyi & Nnamdi Ikechi Nwulu, 2022. "Blockchain-Based Gas Auctioning Coupled with a Novel Economic Dispatch Formulation for Gas-Deficient Thermal Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    16. Jelena Lukić & Miloš Radenković & Marijana Despotović-Zrakić & Aleksandra Labus & Zorica Bogdanović, 2017. "Supply chain intelligence for electricity markets: A smart grid perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 91-107, February.
    17. Samende, Cephas & Cao, Jun & Fan, Zhong, 2022. "Multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm for peer-to-peer energy trading considering distribution network constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    18. Barbara Wyrzykowska & Hubert Szczepaniuk & Edyta Karolina Szczepaniuk & Anna Rytko & Marzena Kacprzak, 2024. "Intelligent Energy Management Systems in Industry 5.0: Cybersecurity Applications in Examples," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Yasmine Souissi & Ferdaws Ezzi & Anis Jarboui, 2024. "Blockchain Adoption and Financial Distress: Mediating Role of Information Asymmetry," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3903-3926, March.
    20. Alessandra Chiarini & Lorenzo Compagnucci, 2022. "Blockchain, Data Protection and P2P Energy Trading: A Review on Legal and Economic Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3570-:d:268434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.