IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i17p3309-d261584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Allocation Mechanism Design for Urban Utility Tunnel Construction Based on Cooperative Game and Resource Dependence Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Zhang

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Jiaorong Ren

    (Ningbo Electric Power Supply Company of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co., Ningbo 315121, China)

  • Kaichao Xiao

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Zhenzhi Lin

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Jiayu Xu

    (Ningbo Electric Power Supply Company of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co., Ningbo 315121, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (Ningbo Electric Power Supply Company of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co., Ningbo 315121, China)

  • Chuanxun Pei

    (Ningbo Electric Power Supply Company of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co., Ningbo 315121, China)

Abstract

The urban utility tunnel presents solutions for the sustainable development of urban underground space, and is an important carrier of power distribution network and integrated energy systems. Considering the high investment cost of utility tunnels and the limitations of traditional cost sharing methods (i.e., spatial proportional method, direct-laying cost method and benefit-based proportional method), it is of great significance to establish a fair and practical cost sharing mechanism. First, an improved Shapley value-based spatial proportional method is proposed. A comprehensive decision-making mechanism for utility tunnel construction cost allocation is established by using the improved spatial proportion, the life-cycle direct-laying cost proportion, and the benefit proportion of pipeline companies as the cost allocation indexes. The resource dependence theory is introduced to quantify the bargaining power of each pipeline company in the negotiation of the cost allocation. The weights of the cost allocation indexes in the comprehensive decision-making model are optimized with the objective of maximizing the overall satisfaction of the pipeline companies. Simulations based on the data of utility tunnel pilots in China illustrate that the proposed cost allocation mechanism has the highest overall satisfaction and is more acceptable and more feasible than the traditional cost allocation methods. For power companies, the cost of laying power cables can be significantly reduced by utility tunnels, and laying 10 kV power cables has been shown to have higher economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Zhang & Jiaorong Ren & Kaichao Xiao & Zhenzhi Lin & Jiayu Xu & Wei Wang & Chuanxun Pei, 2019. "Cost Allocation Mechanism Design for Urban Utility Tunnel Construction Based on Cooperative Game and Resource Dependence Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3309-:d:261584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nina Shin & Sun Hyun Park & Sangwook Park, 2019. "Partnership-Based Supply Chain Collaboration: Impact on Commitment, Innovation, and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Kai Ye & Xiaodong Zhou & Lizhong Yang & Xiao Tang & Yuan Zheng & Bei Cao & Yang Peng & Hong Liu & Yong Ni, 2019. "A Multi-Scale Analysis of the Fire Problems in an Urban Utility Tunnel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Lijun Zeng & Laijun Zhao & Qin Wang & Bingcheng Wang & Yuan Ma & Wei Cui & Yujing Xie, 2018. "Modeling Interprovincial Cooperative Energy Saving in China: An Electricity Utilization Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Hongguang Liu & Xiaomei Fan, 2017. "Value-Added-Based Accounting of CO 2 Emissions: A Multi-Regional Input-Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    5. bhakar, Rohit & sriram, V.s. & padhy, Narayana prasad & gupta, Hari om, 2010. "Probabilistic game approaches for network cost allocation," MPRA Paper 29003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noriko Irie & Ryusei Iwamura & Kaho Sugiura & Naoko Kawahara, 2022. "Siting Renewable Energy Facilities Using a Matching Algorithm: A Case Study in Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Zi-Yun Zhang & Fang-Le Peng & Chen-Xiao Ma & Hui Zhang & Su-Juan Fu, 2021. "External Benefit Assessment of Urban Utility Tunnels Based on Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Meng & Gao, Yuning & Meng, Bo & Yang, Zhusong, 2021. "Managing the mitigation: Analysis of the effectiveness of target-based policies on China's provincial carbon emission and transfer," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Xue, Jian & Guo, Na & Zhao, Laijun & Zhu, Di & Ji, Xiaoqin, 2020. "A cooperative inter-provincial model for energy conservation based on futures trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Marty, Justine & Ruel, Salomée, 2024. "Why is “supply chain collaboration” still a hot topic? A review of decades of research and a comprehensive framework proposal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Qinghua Fu & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Muhammad Zulqarnain Arshad & Ubaldo Comite & Phung Anh Thu & József Popp, 2021. "The Inter-Relationship between Innovation Capability and SME Performance: The Moderating Role of the External Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Joon-Seok Kim & Nina Shin, 2019. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology Application on Supply Chain Partnership and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Shin, Nina & Park, Sangwook, 2021. "Supply chain leadership driven strategic resilience capabilities management: A leader-member exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Zeng, Lijun & Du, Wenjing & Zhang, Wencheng & Zhao, Laijun & Wang, Zhaohua, 2023. "An inter-provincial cooperation model under Renewable Portfolio Standard policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Devesh Singh & Sunil Kumar Dhiman, 2023. "The linkage between carbon emissions, foreign direct investment, economic growth, and gross value added," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(1), pages 156-176, March.
    10. Mohammed Belal Uddin & Bilkis Akhter, 2022. "Investigating the relationship between top management commitment, supply chain collaboration, and sustainable firm performance in the agro-processing supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1399-1417, December.
    11. Hee-sung Bae, 2021. "The Interaction Effect of Information Systems of Shipping and Logistics Firms and Managers’ Support for Blockchain Technology on Cooperation with Shippers for Sustainable Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Tsu-Ming Yeh & Fan-Yun Pai & Liang-Chuan Wu, 2020. "Relationship Stability and Supply Chain Performance for SMEs: From Internal, Supplier, and Customer Integration Perspectives," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Kengo Suzuki & Ryohei Ishiwata, 2022. "Impact of a Carbon Tax on Energy Transition in a Deregulated Market: A Game-Based Experimental Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Chai Bin Feng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Raheel Safdar & Sultan Sikandar Mirza & Amjad Iqbal, 2023. "Corporate strategic responses, supplier concentration and sustainable growth of chinese listed firms," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1413-1427, September.
    15. M. Fiestras-Janeiro & Ignacio García-Jurado & Manuel Mosquera, 2011. "Cooperative games and cost allocation problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Yaoguang Zhong & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Fangfang Guo & Huajun Tang, 2020. "Effects of Partnership Quality and Information Sharing on Express Delivery Service Performance in the E-commerce Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Xue, Jian & Guo, Meichen & Shi, Shaoqing & Zhao, Laijun, 2024. "Energy-conservation model of inter-provincial cooperation that accounts GDP and social benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    18. Mihaela Tofan & Ionel Bostan, 2022. "Some Implications of the Development of E-Commerce on EU Tax Regulations," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Liaqat Ali & S. M. Muyeen & Hamed Bizhani & Arindam Ghosh, 2019. "Comparative Study on Game-Theoretic Optimum Sizing and Economical Analysis of a Networked Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Yujia Huo & Jiali Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Yang Xu, 2022. "The Collaboration Mechanism of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Dominated by Farmer Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3309-:d:261584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.