IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10729-d1538445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-Driven Analysis of Supply Chain Integration’s Impact on Procurement Performance in International EPC Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaxin Huang

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Shui Ming Li

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Integrated supply chain management is essential for enhancing procurement efficiency and project outcomes in international engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) projects. Despite its acknowledged importance, there is a paucity of understanding regarding the precise effects of supply chain integration on procurement processes in this context. This research analyzes 45 projects overseen by prominent Chinese international contractors to bridge this gap. The research employs Pearson correlation analysis to identify robust correlations among critical components of supply chain integration, procurement management, and procurement performance. Essential elements, including operational performance, procurement contract management, and stakeholder engagement, are identified as critical determinants of project success. The study seeks to examine how international EPC contractors incorporate the complete procurement management process via supply chain integration. Contractors can improve operational efficiency and procurement management by forming partnerships with stakeholders to acquire and integrate resources, hence enhancing project outcomes. This ongoing enhancement process improves procurement efficiency and bolsters the competitiveness of Chinese contractors in the global EPC market. The study underscores the efficiency and sustainability of procurement processes, demonstrating how optimized supply chain integration advances broader sustainability objectives by minimizing waste, enhancing resource utilization, and promoting environmentally and socially responsible procurement practices in international projects. The research offers significant empirical data and insights for academic inquiries and actual company implementations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaxin Huang & Shui Ming Li, 2024. "Data-Driven Analysis of Supply Chain Integration’s Impact on Procurement Performance in International EPC Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10729-:d:1538445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Vaart, Taco & van Donk, Dirk Pieter, 2008. "A critical review of survey-based research in supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 42-55, January.
    2. Lau, Hon-Shiang & Hing-Ling Lau, Amy, 1996. "The newsstand problem: A capacitated multiple-product single-period inventory problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 29-42, October.
    3. Nina Shin & Sun Hyun Park & Sangwook Park, 2019. "Partnership-Based Supply Chain Collaboration: Impact on Commitment, Innovation, and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Albert Chan, 2000. "Evaluation of enhanced design and build system - a case study of a hospital project," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 863-871.
    5. Jiaxin Huang & Shui Ming Li, 2024. "Adaptive Strategies and Sustainable Innovations of Chinese Contractors in the Belt and Road Initiative: A Social Network and Supply Chain Integration Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Yeo, K.T. & Ning, J.H., 2006. "Managing uncertainty in major equipment procurement in engineering projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 123-134, May.
    7. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 2004. "Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1887-1893, December.
    8. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 2004. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1875-1886, December.
    9. Mike Bresnen & Nick Marshall, 2000. "Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 229-237.
    10. Olhager, Jan & Selldin, Erik, 2003. "Enterprise resource planning survey of Swedish manufacturing firms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 365-373, April.
    11. Robert Newcombe, 2003. "From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 841-848.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johan Larsson & Lisa Larsson, 2020. "Integration, Application and Importance of Collaboration in Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Wang, Zhaodong & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Bounded growth of the bullwhip effect under a class of nonlinear ordering policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 72-82.
    3. Zhang, Xiaolong & Burke, Gerard J., 2011. "Analysis of compound bullwhip effect causes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 514-526, May.
    4. Seitz, Alexander & Grunow, Martin & Akkerman, Renzo, 2020. "Data driven supply allocation to individual customers considering forecast bias," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    5. Marty, Justine & Ruel, Salomée, 2024. "Why is “supply chain collaboration” still a hot topic? A review of decades of research and a comprehensive framework proposal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    6. Darwish, M.A. & Odah, O.M., 2010. "Vendor managed inventory model for single-vendor multi-retailer supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 473-484, August.
    7. Chong, Alain Yee-Loong & Zhou, Li, 2014. "Demand chain management: Relationships between external antecedents, web-based integration and service innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 48-58.
    8. Abhijit Baidya, 2019. "Stochastic supply chain, transportation models: implementations and benefits," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 432-476, June.
    9. Ding, Huiping & Guo, Baochun & Liu, Zhishuo, 2011. "Information sharing and profit allotment based on supply chain cooperation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 70-79, September.
    10. Pedro Domingos Antoniolli, 2016. "Information Technology Framework for Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Demand Management: a Brazilian Case Study," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(2), pages 27-55, March.
    11. Patrick R. Burgess & Funlade T. Sunmola, 2022. "Exploring Attractive Quality Requirements for Short Food Supply Chain Digital Platforms," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Ying Rong & Lawrence V. Snyder & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2017. "Bullwhip and reverse bullwhip effects under the rationing game," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 203-216, April.
    13. Iman Kazemian & Samin Aref, 2016. "Multi-echelon Supply Chain Flexibility Enhancement Through Detecting Bottlenecks," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(4), pages 357-372, December.
    14. Alexander Seitz & Hans Ehm & Renzo Akkerman & Sarah Osman, 2016. "A robust supply chain planning framework for revenue management in the semiconductor industry," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(6), pages 523-533, December.
    15. Zormpas, Dimitrios, 2020. "Investments under vertical relations and agency conflicts: A real options approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 273-287.
    16. Nowak, Thomas & Hofer, Vera, 2014. "On stabilizing volatile product returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 701-708.
    17. repec:hrs:journl::y:2012:v:4:i:3:p:137-153 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. T. V. S. R. K. Prasad & Kolla Srinivas & C. Srinivas, 2020. "Investigations into control strategies of supply chain planning models: a case study," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(3), pages 874-907, September.
    19. Jiaxin Huang & Shui Ming Li, 2024. "Adaptive Strategies and Sustainable Innovations of Chinese Contractors in the Belt and Road Initiative: A Social Network and Supply Chain Integration Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Woo, Donghyup & Suresh, Nallan C., 2022. "Voluntary agreements for sustainability, resource efficiency & firm performance under the supply chain cooperation policy in South Korea," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    21. Sucky, Eric, 2009. "The bullwhip effect in supply chains--An overestimated problem?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 311-322, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10729-:d:1538445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.