IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i9p2241-d165924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Drilling Costs on the US Gas Industry: Prospects for Automation

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel J. G. Crow

    (Sustainable Gas Institute, Imperial College London, 11 Princes Gardens, London SW7 1NA, UK)

  • Kris Anderson

    (Sustainable Gas Institute, Imperial College London, 11 Princes Gardens, London SW7 1NA, UK)

  • Adam D. Hawkes

    (Sustainable Gas Institute, Imperial College London, 11 Princes Gardens, London SW7 1NA, UK)

  • Nigel Brandon

    (Sustainable Gas Institute, Imperial College London, 11 Princes Gardens, London SW7 1NA, UK)

Abstract

Recent low gas prices have greatly increased pressure on drilling companies to reduce costs and increase efficiency. Field trials have shown that implementing automation can dramatically reduce drilling costs by reducing the time required to drill wells. This study uses the DYNamic upstreAm gAs MOdel (DYNAAMO), a new techno-economic, bottom-up model of natural gas supply, to quantitatively assess the economic impact of lower drilling costs on the US upstream gas industry. A sensitivity analysis of three key economic indicators is presented, with results quoted for the most common field types currently producing, including unconventional and offshore gas. While all operating environments show increased profitability from drilling automation, it is found that conventional onshore reserves can benefit to the greatest extent. For large gas fields, a 50% reduction in drilling costs is found to reduce initial project breakevens by up to 17 million USD per billion cubic metres (MUSD/BCM) and mid-plateau breakevens by up to 8 MUSD/BCM. In this same scenario, additional volumes of around 160 BCM of unconventional gas are shown to become commercial due to both the lower costs of additional production wells in mature fields and the viability of developing new resources held in smaller fields. The capital efficiency of onshore projects increases by 50%–100%, with initial project net present value (NPV) gains of up to 32%.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel J. G. Crow & Kris Anderson & Adam D. Hawkes & Nigel Brandon, 2018. "Impact of Drilling Costs on the US Gas Industry: Prospects for Automation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2241-:d:165924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crow, Daniel J.G. & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "A dynamic model of global natural gas supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 452-469.
    2. Söderbergh, Bengt & Jakobsson, Kristofer & Aleklett, Kjell, 2010. "European energy security: An analysis of future Russian natural gas production and exports," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7827-7843, December.
    3. Weijermars, Ruud, 2013. "Economic appraisal of shale gas plays in Continental Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 100-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & Gustavo Soutinho & Isabel Soares, 2023. "Natural Gas Prices in the Framework of European Union’s Energy Transition: Assessing Evolution and Drivers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-46, February.
    2. Devine, Mel T. & Russo, Marianna, 2019. "Liquefied natural gas and gas storage valuation: Lessons from the integrated Irish and UK markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1389-1406.
    3. Zhao‐Zhong Yang & Liang‐Ping Yi & Xiao‐Gang Li & Yu Li & Min Jia, 2018. "Phase control of downhole fluid during supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 1079-1089, December.
    4. Aleksei Valentinovich Bogoviz & Svetlana Vladislavlevna Lobova & Yulia Vyacheslavovna Ragulina & Alexander Nikolaevich Alekseev, 2018. "Russia s Energy Security Doctrine: Addressing Emerging Challenges and Opportunities," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 1-6.
    5. Huang, Liang & Ning, Zhengfu & Wang, Qing & Zhang, Wentong & Cheng, Zhilin & Wu, Xiaojun & Qin, Huibo, 2018. "Effect of organic type and moisture on CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 28-43.
    6. Souayfane, Farah & Biwole, Pascal Henry & Fardoun, Farouk & Achard, Patrick, 2019. "Energy performance and economic analysis of a TIM-PCM wall under different climates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1274-1291.
    7. Zhao, Xu & Wang, Jiawei & Lei, Shan, 2023. "Does regional natural gas supply produce a shortfall under transition from coal to gas? Case study in Jing-Jin-Ji Region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Crow, Daniel J.G. & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "A dynamic model of global natural gas supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 452-469.
    9. Anca Gabriela Ilie & Marinela Luminita Emanuela Zlatea & Cristina Negreanu & Dan Dumitriu & Alma Pentescu, 2023. "Reliance on Russian Federation Energy Imports and Renewable Energy in the European Union," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(64), pages 780-780, August.
    10. Zhang, Rongda & Wei, Jing & Zhao, Xiaoli & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Economic and environmental benefits of the integration between carbon sequestration and underground gas storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Andres Soage & Ruben Juanes & Ignasi Colominas & Luis Cueto-Felgueroso, 2024. "Optimization of Financial Indicators in Shale-Gas Wells Combining Numerical Decline Curve Analysis and Economic Data Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Ravnik, J. & Hriberšek, M., 2019. "A method for natural gas forecasting and preliminary allocation based on unique standard natural gas consumption profiles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 149-162.
    13. De Silva, P.N.K. & Simons, S.J.R. & Stevens, P., 2016. "Economic impact analysis of natural gas development and the policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 639-651.
    14. Kim, Tae Hong & Cho, Jinhyung & Lee, Kun Sang, 2017. "Evaluation of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs with multi-component transport and geomechanical effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1195-1206.
    15. Brown, Maxwell & Siddiqui, Sauleh & Avraam, Charalampos & Bistline, John & Decarolis, Joseph & Eshraghi, Hadi & Giarola, Sara & Hansen, Matthew & Johnston, Peter & Khanal, Saroj & Molar-Cruz, Anahi, 2021. "North American energy system responses to natural gas price shocks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Yi, Jie & Zhong, Dong-Liang & Yan, Jin & Lu, Yi-Yu, 2019. "Impacts of the surfactant sulfonated lignin on hydrate based CO2 capture from a CO2/CH4 gas mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 61-68.
    17. Madurai Elavarasan, Rajvikram & Pugazhendhi, Rishi & Irfan, Muhammad & Mihet-Popa, Lucian & Campana, Pietro Elia & Khan, Irfan Ahmad, 2022. "A novel Sustainable Development Goal 7 composite index as the paradigm for energy sustainability assessment: A case study from Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    18. Tavana, Madjid & Pirdashti, Mohsen & Kennedy, Dennis T. & Belaud, Jean-Pierre & Behzadian, Majid, 2012. "A hybrid Delphi-SWOT paradigm for oil and gas pipeline strategic planning in Caspian Sea basin," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 345-360.
    19. Gillessen, B. & Heinrichs, H. & Hake, J.-F. & Allelein, H.-J., 2019. "Natural gas as a bridge to sustainability: Infrastructure expansion regarding energy security and system transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Stürmer, Bernhard & Novakovits, Philipp & Luidolt, Alexander & Zweiler, Richard, 2019. "Potential of renewable methane by anaerobic digestion from existing plant stock – An economic reflection of an Austrian region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 920-929.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2241-:d:165924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.