IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i6p1616-d153529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Future of Fossil Fired Power Plants in Germany—A Lifetime Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Markewitz

    (Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering (IEK-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany)

  • Martin Robinius

    (Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering (IEK-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany)

  • Detlef Stolten

    (Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering (IEK-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany
    RWTH Aachen University, c/o Institute of Electrochemical Process Engineering (IEK-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany)

Abstract

In many German energy projections, the assumption of power plant lifetimes plays a central role, since it is often used in projections for the existing fleet of power plants or as a criterion for decommissioning in model-based investigations. The result of these analyses is a power plant capacity retirement graph, which is then used to determine the replacement demand. Especially in the context of the German Energy transition (“Energiewende”) the amount and dynamics of replacement play an important role. Against this background, a large number of studies have been evaluated and fleet developments compared. Many studies refer to empirical values for the assumption of lifetimes without specifying them in greater detail. This approach was used to conduct an ex post lifetime analysis—accurate to each number of units—of German power plants that have been decommissioned since 1990. The analysis is conducted with the aid of a power plant database, which has been continuously updated for each individual unit since 1985. In addition to the power plants currently in operation, the database includes also includes power plant units that have been successively decommissioned over the past decades. The ex post analysis presents the first lifetime analysis for decommissioned German plants, which can serve as a basis for future power plant fleet projections. The analyses show that the lifetime of fossil-fired power plants has extended considerably. For example, whereas the real lifetimes of coal-fired power plants were in a range of 30 to 35 years in the 1990s, today they amount to 40 to 45 years on average.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Markewitz & Martin Robinius & Detlef Stolten, 2018. "The Future of Fossil Fired Power Plants in Germany—A Lifetime Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1616-:d:153529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1616/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1616/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. García-Gusano, Diego & Iribarren, Diego & Dufour, Javier, 2018. "Is coal extension a sensible option for energy planning? A combined energy systems modelling and life cycle assessment approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 413-421.
    2. Johnson, Nils & Krey, Volker & McCollum, David L. & Rao, Shilpa & Riahi, Keywan & Rogelj, Joeri, 2015. "Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 89-102.
    3. Martin Robinius & Felix ter Stein & Adrien Schwane & Detlef Stolten, 2017. "A Top-Down Spatially Resolved Electrical Load Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula & Markewitz, Peter, 2017. "Long-term impacts of a coal phase-out in Germany as part of a greenhouse gas mitigation strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 234-246.
    5. Odenberger, M. & Johnsson, F., 2007. "Achieving 60% CO2 reductions within the UK energy system--Implications for the electricity generation sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2433-2452, April.
    6. Heinz, B. & Graeber, M. & Praktiknjo, A.J., 2013. "The diffusion process of stationary fuel cells in a two-sided market economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1556-1567.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ernesto Rivas & María Ángeles Martín-Lara & Gabriel Blázquez & Antonio Pérez & Mónica Calero, 2019. "Column Leaching Tests to Valorize a Solid Waste from the Decommissioning of Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Taewook Huh & Yong-Chan Choi & Jiyoung Hailiey Kim, 2018. "The Time-Series of Energy Mix and Transition: A Comparative Study of OECD Countries through the Fuzzy-Set Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Martyna Tomala & Andrzej Rusin & Adam Wojaczek, 2020. "Risk-Based Planning of Diagnostic Testing of Turbines Operating with Increased Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Tlili, Olfa & Mansilla, Christine & Robinius, Martin & Syranidis, Konstantinos & Reuss, Markus & Linssen, Jochen & André, Jean & Perez, Yannick & Stolten, Detlef, 2019. "Role of electricity interconnections and impact of the geographical scale on the French potential of producing hydrogen via electricity surplus by 2035," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 977-990.
    5. Kuznetsov, G.V. & Malyshev, D. Yu & Syrodoy, S.V. & Gutareva, N. Yu & Purin, M.V. & Kostoreva, Zh. A., 2022. "Justification of the use of forest waste in the power industry as one of the components OF BIO-coal-water suspension fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    6. Alina Maciejewska & Łukasz Kuzak & Janusz Sobieraj & Dominik Metelski, 2022. "The Impact of Opencast Lignite Mining on Rural Development: A Literature Review and Selected Case Studies Using Desk Research, Panel Data and GIS-Based Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-36, July.
    7. Pietzcker, Robert C. & Osorio, Sebastian & Rodrigues, Renato, 2021. "Tightening EU ETS targets in line with the European Green Deal: Impacts on the decarbonization of the EU power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anke, Carl-Philipp & Hobbie, Hannes & Schreiber, Steffi & Möst, Dominik, 2020. "Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: Interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Liu, Yanyan & Huang, Guohe & Chen, Jiapei & Zhang, Xiaoyue & Zheng, Xiaogui & Zhai, Mengyu, 2022. "Development of an optimization-aided small modular reactor siting model – A case study of Saskatchewan, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    3. Osorio, Sebastian & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Pahle, Michael & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Gerbaulet, Clemens & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Kemfert, Claudia & Lorenz, Casimir & Oei, Pao-Yu, 2019. "European electricity sector decarbonization under different levels of foresight," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 141, pages 973-987.
    5. Cerovac, Tin & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2014. "Wind energy integration into future energy systems based on conventional plants – The case study of Croatia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 643-655.
    6. Zhang, Ruirui & Wang, Guiling & Shen, Xiaoxu & Wang, Jinfeng & Tan, Xianfeng & Feng, Shoutao & Hong, Jinglan, 2020. "Is geothermal heating environmentally superior than coal fired heating in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Iribarren, Diego & Martín-Gamboa, Mario & Navas-Anguita, Zaira & García-Gusano, Diego & Dufour, Javier, 2020. "Influence of climate change externalities on the sustainability-oriented prioritisation of prospective energy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Navas-Anguita, Zaira & García-Gusano, Diego & Iribarren, Diego, 2019. "A review of techno-economic data for road transportation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 11-26.
    9. Gawlik, Bernd Manfred & Sobiecka, Elzbieta & Vaccaro, Stefano & Ciceri, Giovanni, 2007. "Quality management organisation, validation of standards, developments and inquiries for solid-recovered fuels--An overview on the QUOVADIS-Project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6293-6298, December.
    10. Lola Nacke & Vadim Vinichenko & Aleh Cherp & Avi Jakhmola & Jessica Jewell, 2024. "Compensating affected parties necessary for rapid coal phase-out but expensive if extended to major emitters," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Sen, Suphi & von Schickfus, Marie-Theres, 2020. "Climate policy, stranded assets, and investors’ expectations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    12. Cahen-Fourot, Louison & Campiglio, Emanuele & Godin, Antoine & Kemp-Benedict, Eric & Trsek, Stefan, 2021. "Capital stranding cascades: The impact of decarbonisation on productive asset utilisation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Vinca, Adriano & Rottoli, Marianna & Marangoni, Giacomo & Tavoni, Massimo, 2017. "The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage Electricity in Attaining 1.5 and 2°C," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 266285, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Fortes, Patrícia & Simoes, Sofia G. & Gouveia, João Pedro & Seixas, Júlia, 2019. "Electricity, the silver bullet for the deep decarbonisation of the energy system? Cost-effectiveness analysis for Portugal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 292-303.
    15. Klöckner, Kai & Letmathe, Peter, 2020. "Is the coherence of coal phase-out and electrolytic hydrogen production the golden path to effective decarbonisation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Nguyen, Quyen & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda, 2021. "Predicting corporate carbon footprints for climate finance risk analyses: A machine learning approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Pao-Yu Oei & Roman Mendelevitch, 2019. "Prospects for steam coal exporters in the era of climate policies: a case study of Colombia," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 73-91, January.
    18. Healey, Stephen & Jaccard, Mark, 2016. "Abundant low-cost natural gas and deep GHG emissions reductions for the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 241-253.
    19. Ernesto Rivas & María Ángeles Martín-Lara & Gabriel Blázquez & Antonio Pérez & Mónica Calero, 2019. "Column Leaching Tests to Valorize a Solid Waste from the Decommissioning of Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Chen, Chen & Liu, Ming & Li, Mengjie & Wang, Yu & Wang, Chaoyang & Yan, Junjie, 2024. "Digital twin modeling and operation optimization of the steam turbine system of thermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1616-:d:153529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.