IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i12p3331-d186398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Mitigation Pathway Evaluation and Environmental Benefit Analysis of Mitigation Technologies in China’s Petrochemical and Chemical Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Yang

    (Academy of Chinese Energy Strategy, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102240, China)

  • Xiaoqian Xi

    (Academy of Chinese Energy Strategy, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102240, China)

  • Shan Guo

    (Academy of Chinese Energy Strategy, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102240, China)

  • Wanqi Lin

    (Academy of Chinese Energy Strategy, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102240, China)

  • Xiangzhao Feng

    (Policy Research Center for Environment and Economy of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

The co-benefits of mitigation technology in China’s petrochemical and chemical industry have not been evaluated, although they are deemed valuable for the cost-benefit analysis of carbon mitigation. On this basis, this study evaluates the carbon mitigation effects and environmental co-benefits of mitigation technologies that have been long ignored in China’s petrochemical and chemical industry. In addition, this study also fills the gap of provincial research in chemical industry. A bottom-up energy model and marginal abatement cost curves are constructed for each sector. The study is based on national and provincial levels to provide quantitative reference for the mitigation technologies. Results show that, among 18 technologies in the chemical industry, waste heat utilization and technological process transformation technologies have the highest marginal abatement benefits. Technologies in the petrochemical industry with the largest marginal abatement social benefit typically exists in three categories: efficiency improvement technology, waste heat utilization technology, and coating technology. At the national level, 8039 and 5105 premature deaths are effectively avoided by the promotion of chemical and petrochemical mitigation technologies, respectively. Monetary value of health impact in these two industries are 7.0 billion and 5.5 billion RMB, respectively. At the provincial level, coal gasification multi-generation gas turbine power generation technology, a technological process transformation technology, performs well in Shaanxi province with 122 million RMB of total social benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Yang & Xiaoqian Xi & Shan Guo & Wanqi Lin & Xiangzhao Feng, 2018. "Carbon Mitigation Pathway Evaluation and Environmental Benefit Analysis of Mitigation Technologies in China’s Petrochemical and Chemical Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3331-:d:186398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Zhang, Yan & Su, Meirong & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Prevention and control policy analysis for energy-related regional pollution management in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 292-300.
    2. Yang, Xi & Teng, Fei & Wang, Gehua, 2013. "Incorporating environmental co-benefits into climate policies: A regional study of the cement industry in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1446-1453.
    3. Li, Nan & Ma, Ding & Chen, Wenying, 2017. "Quantifying the impacts of decarbonisation in China’s cement sector: A perspective from an integrated assessment approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1840-1848.
    4. Yang, Xi & Teng, Fei & Xi, Xiaoqian & Khayrullin, Egor & Zhang, Qi, 2018. "Cost–benefit analysis of China’s Intended Nationally Determined Contributions based on carbon marginal cost curves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 415-425.
    5. Zhang, Shaohui & Worrell, Ernst & Crijns-Graus, Wina, 2015. "Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency and air pollution abatement in China’s cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 192-213.
    6. Xie, Xuan & Shao, Shuai & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Exploring the driving forces and mitigation pathways of CO2 emissions in China’s petroleum refining and coking industry: 1995–2031," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1004-1015.
    7. Susan L. Greco & Anna Belova & Jin Huang, 2016. "Benefits of Decreased Mortality Risk from Reductions in Primary Mobile Source Fine Particulate Matter: A Limited Data Approach for Urban Areas Worldwide," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(9), pages 1783-1802, September.
    8. Zhang, Shaohui & Worrell, Ernst & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Krol, Maarten & de Bruine, Marco & Geng, Guangpo & Wagner, Fabian & Cofala, Janusz, 2016. "Modeling energy efficiency to improve air quality and health effects of China’s cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 574-593.
    9. Liu, Xiaoyu & Chen, Dingjiang & Zhang, Wenjun & Qin, Weizhong & Zhou, Wenji & Qiu, Tong & Zhu, Bing, 2013. "An assessment of the energy-saving potential in China's petroleum refining industry from a technical perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 38-49.
    10. James Hammitt & Ying Zhou, 2006. "The Economic Value of Air-Pollution-Related Health Risks in China: A Contingent Valuation Study," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 33(3), pages 399-423, March.
    11. Chen, Wenying, 2005. "The costs of mitigating carbon emissions in China: findings from China MARKAL-MACRO modeling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 885-896, May.
    12. Gilmore, Elisabeth A. & Patwardhan, Anand, 2016. "Passenger vehicles that minimize the costs of ownership and environmental damages in the Indian market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 863-872.
    13. Geng, ZhiQiang & Dong, JunGen & Han, YongMing & Zhu, QunXiong, 2017. "Energy and environment efficiency analysis based on an improved environment DEA cross-model: Case study of complex chemical processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 465-476.
    14. Chen, Nengcheng & Xu, Lei & Chen, Zeqiang, 2017. "Environmental efficiency analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Zone using super efficiency data envelopment analysis (SEDEA) and tobit models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 659-671.
    15. Dong, Huijuan & Dai, Hancheng & Dong, Liang & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Geng, Yong & Klimont, Zbigniew & Inoue, Tsuyoshi & Bunya, Shintaro & Fujii, Minoru & Masui, Toshihiko, 2015. "Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 165-174.
    16. Zhang, Shaohui & Worrell, Ernst & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Wagner, Fabian & Cofala, Janusz, 2014. "Co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement and air pollution abatement in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 333-345.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han, Yongming & Liu, Shuang & Geng, Zhiqiang & Gu, Hengchang & Qu, Yixin, 2021. "Energy analysis and resources optimization of complex chemical processes: Evidence based on novel DEA cross-model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    2. Hofbauer, Leonhard & McDowall, Will & Pye, Steve, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities for energy system modelling to foster multi-level governance of energy transitions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Li & Xianchun Tan & Jianxin Guo & Kaiwei Zhu & Chen Huang, 2019. "Study on an Implementation Scheme of Synergistic Emission Reduction of CO 2 and Air Pollutants in China’s Steel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Peng, Wei & Yang, Junnan & Lu, Xi & Mauzerall, Denise L., 2018. "Potential co-benefits of electrification for air quality, health, and CO2 mitigation in 2030 China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 511-519.
    3. Yang, Jin & Song, Dan & Wu, Feng, 2017. "Regional variations of environmental co-benefits of wind power generation in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1267-1281.
    4. Yongsheng Lin & Zhe Liu & Rui Liu & Xiaoman Yu & Liming Zhang, 2020. "Uncovering driving forces of co-benefits achieved by eco-industrial development strategies at the scale of industrial park," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(2), pages 275-290, March.
    5. Zhao, Hongyan & Zhang, Qiang & Huo, Hong & Lin, Jintai & Liu, Zhu & Wang, Haikun & Guan, Dabo & He, Kebin, 2016. "Environment-economy tradeoff for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei’s exports," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 926-935.
    6. Zhongyao Cai & Xiaohui Yang & Huaxing Lin & Xinyu Yang & Ping Jiang, 2022. "Study on the Co-Benefits of Air Pollution Control and Carbon Reduction in the Yellow River Basin: An Assessment Based on a Spatial Econometric Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Haoqi, Qian & Libo, Wu & Weiqi, Tang, 2017. "“Lock-in” effect of emission standard and its impact on the choice of market based instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 41-50.
    8. Ma, Ding & Chen, Wenying & Yin, Xiang & Wang, Lining, 2016. "Quantifying the co-benefits of decarbonisation in China’s steel sector: An integrated assessment approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1225-1237.
    9. Chen, Hao & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liao, Hua & Tang, Bao-Jun & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Costs and potentials of energy conservation in China's coal-fired power industry: A bottom-up approach considering price uncertainties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 23-32.
    10. Wang, Lining & Patel, Pralit L. & Yu, Sha & Liu, Bo & McLeod, Jeff & Clarke, Leon E. & Chen, Wenying, 2016. "Win–Win strategies to promote air pollutant control policies and non-fossil energy target regulation in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 244-253.
    11. Zhang, Shaohui & Worrell, Ernst & Crijns-Graus, Wina, 2015. "Synergy of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions of Chinese industries: A critical assessment of energy models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2436-2450.
    12. Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana & Kelemen, Agnes & Tirado-Herrero, Sergio & Thomas, Stefan & Thema, Johannes & Mzavanadze, Nora & Hauptstock, Dorothea & Suerkemper, Felix & Teubler, Jens & Gupta, Mukesh & Chatter, 2016. "Measuring multiple impacts of low-carbon energy options in a green economy context," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1409-1426.
    13. Wang, Ke & Wang, Shanshan & Liu, Lei & Yue, Hui & Zhang, Ruiqin & Tang, Xiaoyan, 2016. "Environmental co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement in coal-fired power sector: A case study of Henan Province, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 810-819.
    14. Liu, Zhe & Adams, Michelle & Cote, Raymond P. & Geng, Yong & Ren, Jingzheng & Chen, Qinghua & Liu, Weili & Zhu, Xuesong, 2018. "Co-benefits accounting for the implementation of eco-industrial development strategies in the scale of industrial park based on emergy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1522-1529.
    15. Zhu, Junpeng & Wu, Shaohui & Xu, Junbing, 2023. "Synergy between pollution control and carbon reduction: China's evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Liu, Xuewei & Yuan, Zengwei & Xu, Yuan & Jiang, Songyan, 2017. "Greening cement in China: A cost-effective roadmap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 233-244.
    17. Yue, Hui & Worrell, Ernst & Crijns-Graus, Wina, 2021. "Impacts of regional industrial electricity savings on the development of future coal capacity per electricity grid and related air pollution emissions – A case study for China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    18. Xuan, Yanni & Yue, Qiang, 2017. "Scenario analysis on resource and environmental benefits of imported steel scrap for China’s steel industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 186-198.
    19. Liu, Yang & Zhang, Congrui & Xu, Xiaochuan & Ge, Yongxiang & Ren, Gaofeng, 2022. "Assessment of energy conservation potential and cost in open-pit metal mines: Bottom-up approach integrated energy conservation supply curve and ultimate pit limit," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    20. Du, Huibin & Li, Qun & Liu, Xi & Peng, Binbin & Southworth, Frank, 2021. "Costs and potentials of reducing CO2 emissions in China's transport sector: Findings from an energy system analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3331-:d:186398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.