IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i4p499-d95219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Feasibilities of Industry 4.0 for the Hospitality Sector with the Lens of Management Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Saqib Shamim

    (Faculty of Sciences & Technology, Talbot Campus, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Shuang Cang

    (Faculty of Management, Talbot Campus, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Hongnian Yu

    (Faculty of Sciences & Technology, Talbot Campus, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Yun Li

    (School of Computer Science and Network Security, Dongguan University of Technology, Shongshanhu, Dongguan 523808, China)

Abstract

Industry 4.0 and its impact in the manufacturing sector are well documented. However, the service sector is understudied, and it is also facing the challenges of mass customization, digital enhancement, smart work environment, and efficient supply chain. The aim of this study is to fill this research gap by exploring the issues of Industry 4.0 in the service sector, with cases in the hospitality industry. All the challenges of Industry 4.0 require continuous innovation and learning, which is dependent on people and the enterprise’s capabilities. Appropriate management approaches can play a vital role in the development of dynamic capabilities, and an effective learning and innovation environment. This paper proposes a framework of management practices which can promote the environment of innovation and learning in an organization, and hence facilitate business to match the pace of Industry 4.0 by facilitating technology acceptance e.g., digital enhancements and implementation of cyber physical systems (CPS). This study integrates the literature with logical beliefs to suggest the appropriate management practices for Industry 4.0. It represents one of the initial attempts to draw research attention towards the important role of management practices in Industry 4.0, as most of the recent studies have been restricted to the technological aspects. Semi-structured interviews of hospitality employees are conducted to explore the management practices suitable for meeting the challenges of Industry 4.0, specifically for informing the service sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Saqib Shamim & Shuang Cang & Hongnian Yu & Yun Li, 2017. "Examining the Feasibilities of Industry 4.0 for the Hospitality Sector with the Lens of Management Practice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:499-:d:95219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/4/499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/4/499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anis Khedhaouria & Arshad Jamal, 2015. "Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teams," Post-Print hal-02011111, HAL.
    2. Birasnav, M., 2014. "Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1622-1629.
    3. Chen, Chung-Jen & Huang, Jing-Wen, 2009. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance -- The mediating role of knowledge management capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 104-114, January.
    4. Donate, Mario J. & Sánchez de Pablo, Jesús D., 2015. "The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 360-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schniederjans, Dara G. & Curado, Carla & Khalajhedayati, Mehrnaz, 2020. "Supply chain digitisation trends: An integration of knowledge management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Lia Tirabeni & Paola De Bernardi & Canio Forliano & Mattia Franco, 2019. "How Can Organisations and Business Models Lead to a More Sustainable Society? A Framework from a Systematic Review of the Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Okechukwu Okorie & Konstantinos Salonitis & Fiona Charnley & Mariale Moreno & Christopher Turner & Ashutosh Tiwari, 2018. "Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, November.
    4. Chiyin Chen & Yunting Feng & Bin Shen, 2022. "Managing Labor Sustainability in Digitalized Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Remigiusz Wisniewski, 2021. "Design of Petri Net-Based Cyber-Physical Systems Oriented on the Implementation in Field Programmable Gate Arrays," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Krzysztof Ejsmont, 2021. "The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Employees—Insights from Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-31, March.
    7. Tomás F. Espino-Rodríguez, 2023. "Research on Outsourcing by Hotel Firms: Current State and Future Directions," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Fanny Kovaleski & Claudia Tania Picinin & João Luiz Kovaleski, 2022. "The Challenges of Technology Transfer in the Industry 4.0 Era Regarding Anthropotechnological Aspects: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    9. Chetna Chauhan & Manzoor Ul Akram & Diptanshu Gaur, 2021. "Technology-Driven Responsiveness in Times of COVID-19: A Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy AHP-Based Approach," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 48-61, December.
    10. Yao-Jen Fan & Shuo-Fang Liu & Ding-Bang Luh & Pei-Shan Teng, 2021. "Corporate Sustainability: Impact Factors on Organizational Innovation in the Industrial Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Dwivedi, Ashish & Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & de Carvalho, Daniel Estima, 2022. "Integrating the circular economy and industry 4.0 for sustainable development: Implications for responsible footwear production in a big data-driven world," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Alessio Maria Braccini, 2021. "Exploring Sustainable Value Creation of Industry 4.0 Technologies Within the Socio-technical Perspective: A Meta-review," Post-Print hal-03410741, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Gupta, Shivam & Busso, Donatella & Kamboj, Shampy, 2021. "Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 788-798.
    2. Wang, Liwen & Zhao, Jane Zheng & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2018. "How do incentives motivate absorptive capacity development? The mediating role of employee learning and relational contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 226-237.
    3. Abdul Waheed & Xiaoming Miao & Salma Waheed & Naveed Ahmad & Abdul Majeed, 2019. "How New HRM Practices, Organizational Innovation, and Innovative Climate Affect the Innovation Performance in the IT Industry: A Moderated-Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Ljiljana Kašćelan & Mirjana Pejić Bach & Biljana Rondović & Tamara Đuričković, 2020. "The interaction between social media, knowledge management and service quality: A decision tree analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Loon, Mark, 2019. "Knowledge management practice system: Theorising from an international meta-standard," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 432-441.
    6. Alpenberg, Jan & Scarbrough, D. Paul, 2016. "Exploring communication practices in lean production," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4959-4963.
    7. Pooja K. Singh & M. K. Rao, 2017. "HR Practices, Learning Culture and Human Capital: A Study on Indian Business and Professional Service Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(3), pages 678-690, June.
    8. Arshinder Singh Chawla & Neha Gahlawat & Sandeep Kumar & Subhash C. Kundu & Homesh Kundu, 2023. "Strategic HRM and Firm Performance: Mediating Role of Knowledge Management Capacity and Innovation Performance," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 48(1), pages 98-117, February.
    9. Grabin Praničević, Daniela & Peterlin, Judita, 2017. "Are ICT Tools Recognized Enough as Management Support in Croatian Tourism?," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2017), Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 7-9 September 2017, pages 33-40, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    10. Sergio Ochoa-Jiménez & Beatriz Alicia Leyva-Osuna & Carlos Armando Jacobo-Hernández & Alma Rocío García-García, 2021. "Knowledge Management in Relation to Innovation and Its Effect on the Sustainability of Mexican Tourism Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    11. I Ketut Setia Sapta & I Nengah Sudja & I Nengah Landra & Ni Wayan Rustiarini, 2021. "Sustainability Performance of Organization: Mediating Role of Knowledge Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Caputo, Francesco & Mazzoleni, Alberto & Pellicelli, Anna Claudia & Muller, Jens, 2020. "Over the mask of innovation management in the world of Big Data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 330-338.
    13. Aleena Syed & Humna Sohail & Sarmad Ejaz & Hafiz Ahmed Ullah, 2020. "Direct and Indirect effect of Knowledge Management Practices on Firm Innovation via Knowledge Application," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 110-118.
    14. Rong Li & Yi-Fei Du & Hong-Juan Tang & Francis Boadu & Min Xue, 2019. "MNEs’ Subsidiary HRM Practices and Firm Innovative Performance: A Tacit Knowledge Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Farnoosh Bagheri & Rassoul Noorossana & Manoochehr Najmi, 2019. "The extent of EFQM effectiveness in routine and non-routine organizations based on multivariate techniques: an empirical study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 237-267, March.
    16. Alba Manresa & Andrea Bikfalvi & Alexandra Simon, 2018. "The Use And Determinants Of Training And Development For Creativity And Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Henry M. H. Chan & Vincent W. S. Cho, 2022. "An Empirical Study: The Impact of Collaborative Communications on New Product Creativity That Contributes to New Product Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Oubrich, Mourad & Hakmaoui, Abdelati & Benhayoun, Lamiae & Solberg Söilen, Klaus & Abdulkader, Bisan, 2021. "Impacts of leadership style, organizational design and HRM practices on knowledge hiding: The indirect roles of organizational justice and competitive work environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 488-499.
    19. Amin Pourbarkhordari & Er Hua Zhou & Javad Pourkarimi, 2016. "How Individual-focused Transformational Leadership Enhances Its Influence on Job Performance through Employee Work Engagement," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 249-249, January.
    20. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:499-:d:95219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.