IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i2p247-d90789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Assessment of Possible Future Waste Management Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Yevgeniya Arushanyan

    (Division of Environmental Strategies Research, Department of Sustainable development, Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Architecture and Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Anna Björklund

    (Division of Environmental Strategies Research, Department of Sustainable development, Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Architecture and Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Ola Eriksson

    (Department of Building, Energy and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, University of Gävle, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Göran Finnveden

    (Division of Environmental Strategies Research, Department of Sustainable development, Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Architecture and Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Maria Ljunggren Söderman

    (Division of Environmental Systems Analysis, Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Jan-Olov Sundqvist

    (IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, PO Box 210 60, SE-100 31 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Åsa Stenmarck

    (IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, PO Box 210 60, SE-100 31 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

Waste management has developed in many countries and will continue to do so. Changes towards increased recovery of resources in order to meet climate targets and for society to transition to a circular economy are important driving forces. Scenarios are important tools for planning and assessing possible future developments and policies. This paper presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) model for environmental assessments of scenarios and waste management policy instruments. It is unique by including almost all waste flows in a country and also allow for including waste prevention. The results show that the environmental impacts from future waste management scenarios in Sweden can differ a lot. Waste management will continue to contribute with environmental benefits, but less so in the more sustainable future scenarios, since the surrounding energy and transportation systems will be less polluting and also because less waste will be produced. Valuation results indicate that climate change, human toxicity and resource depletion are the most important environmental impact categories for the Swedish waste management system. Emissions of fossil CO 2 from waste incineration will continue to be a major source of environmental impacts in these scenarios. The model is used for analyzing environmental impacts of several policy instruments including weight based collection fee, incineration tax, a resource tax and inclusion of waste in a green electricity certification system. The effect of the studied policy instruments in isolation are in most cases limited, suggesting that stronger policy instruments as well as combinations are necessary to reach policy goals as set out in for example the EU action plan on circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yevgeniya Arushanyan & Anna Björklund & Ola Eriksson & Göran Finnveden & Maria Ljunggren Söderman & Jan-Olov Sundqvist & Åsa Stenmarck, 2017. "Environmental Assessment of Possible Future Waste Management Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-27, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:247-:d:90789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/2/247/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/2/247/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marek Antosiewicz & Piotr Lewandowski & Jan Witajewski-Baltvilks, 2016. "Input vs. Output Taxation—A DSGE Approach to Modelling Resource Decoupling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Göran Finnveden & Tomas Ekvall & Yevgeniya Arushanyan & Mattias Bisaillon & Greger Henriksson & Ulrika Gunnarsson Östling & Maria Ljunggren Söderman & Jenny Sahlin & Åsa Stenmarck & Johan Sundberg & J, 2013. "Policy Instruments towards a Sustainable Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-41, February.
    3. Tomas Ekvall & Martin Hirschnitz-Garbers & Fabio Eboli & Aleksander Śniegocki, 2016. "A Systemic and Systematic Approach to the Development of a Policy Mix for Material Resource Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Francesca Montevecchi, 2016. "Policy Mixes to Achieve Absolute Decoupling: A Case Study of Municipal Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Ekvall, Tomas & Hirschnitz-Garbers, Martin & Eboli, Fabio & Sniegocki, Aleksander, 2016. "A Systemic Approach to the Development of a Policy Mix for Material Resource Efficiency," EIA: Climate Change: Economic Impacts and Adaptation 234309, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Tomas Ekvall & Martin Hirschnitz-Garbers & Fabio Eboli & Aleksander Sniegocki, 2016. "A Systemic Approach to the Development of a Policy Mix for Material Resource Efficiency," Working Papers 2016.28, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    7. Emma Watkins & Patrick Ten Brink & Jean-Pierre Schweitzer & Lucile Rogissart & Martin Nesbit, 2016. "Policy Mixes to Achieve Absolute Decoupling: An Ex Ante Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Eriksson, Ola & Bisaillon, Mattias & Haraldsson, Mårten & Sundberg, Johan, 2014. "Integrated waste management as a mean to promote renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 38-42.
    9. Marek Antosiewicz & Piotr Lewandowski & Jan Witajewski-Baltvilks, 2016. "Input vs. Output Taxation—A DSGE Approach to Modelling Resource Decoupling," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Maria Ljunggren Söderman & Ola Eriksson & Anna Björklund & Göran Östblom & Tomas Ekvall & Göran Finnveden & Yevgeniya Arushanyan & Jan-Olov Sundqvist, 2016. "Integrated Economic and Environmental Assessment of Waste Policy Instruments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jara Laso & Isabel García-Herrero & María Margallo & Alba Bala & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer & Angel Irabien & Rubén Aldaco, 2019. "LCA-Based Comparison of Two Organic Fraction Municipal Solid Waste Collection Systems in Historical Centres in Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Mirela Cătălina Türkeș & Dan Ioan Topor & Dana-Maria Oprea Constantin & Andreea Marin-Pantelescu & Mihaela Ștefan Hint, 2018. "The Sustainability of Romanian SMEs and Their Involvement in the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Bauwens, Thomas & Hekkert, Marko & Kirchherr, Julian, 2020. "Circular futures: What Will They Look Like?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Daniel Hoehn & María Margallo & Jara Laso & Isabel García-Herrero & Alba Bala & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer & Angel Irabien & Rubén Aldaco, 2019. "Energy Embedded in Food Loss Management and in the Production of Uneaten Food: Seeking a Sustainable Pathway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Maja Wiprächtiger & Martina Rapp & Stefanie Hellweg & Rhythima Shinde & Melanie Haupt, 2022. "Turning trash into treasure: An approach to the environmental assessment of waste prevention and its application to clothing and furniture in Switzerland," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1389-1405, August.
    6. Ana Ramos & Carlos Afonso Teixeira & Abel Rouboa, 2018. "Environmental Analysis of Waste-to-Energy—A Portuguese Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Antonio Valero & Jorge Torrubia & Miguel Ángel Anía & Alicia Torres, 2021. "Assessing Urban Metabolism through MSW Carbon Footprint and Conceptualizing Municipal-Industrial Symbiosis—The Case of Zaragoza City, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-34, November.
    8. Jara Laso & Daniel Hoehn & María Margallo & Isabel García-Herrero & Laura Batlle-Bayer & Alba Bala & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer & Ian Vázquez-Rowe & Angel Irabien & Rubén Aldaco, 2018. "Assessing Energy and Environmental Efficiency of the Spanish Agri-Food System Using the LCA/DEA Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Marius PETRESCU & Ionica ONCIOIU & Anca-Gabriela PETRESCU & Florentina-Raluca BÎLCAN & Mihai PETRESCU & Dumitru-Alexandru STOICA, 2021. "Estimating the Dynamics of Household Waste Management in Turkey," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 129-143, June.
    10. Ioan G. Pop & Sebastian Văduva & Mihai-Florin Talpoș, 2017. "Energetic Sustainability and the Environment: A Transdisciplinary, Economic–Ecological Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Glenn Baxter & Panarat Srisaeng & Graham Wild, 2018. "An Assessment of Airport Sustainability, Part 1—Waste Management at Copenhagen Airport," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Ola Eriksson, 2017. "Energy and Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonidas Milios, 2021. "Towards a Circular Economy Taxation Framework: Expectations and Challenges of Implementation," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 477-498, September.
    2. Mark Meyer & Martin Hirschnitz-Garbers & Martin Distelkamp, 2018. "Contemporary Resource Policy and Decoupling Trends—Lessons Learnt from Integrated Model-Based Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, June.
    3. Kai Whiting & Luis Gabriel Carmona & Angeles Carrasco & Tânia Sousa, 2017. "Exergy Replacement Cost of Fossil Fuels: Closing the Carbon Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Alfonso González González & Justo García-Sanz-Calcedo & David Rodríguez Salgado, 2018. "Evaluation of Energy Consumption in German Hospitals: Benchmarking in the Public Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Saskia Manshoven & Wim Van Opstal, 2022. "The Carrot or the Stick? Stakeholder Support for Mandatory Regulations towards a Circular Fashion System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    6. Luis Gabriel Carmona & Kai Whiting & Angeles Carrasco & Tânia Sousa & Tiago Domingos, 2017. "Material Services with Both Eyes Wide Open," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Chan, Ying Tung & Zhao, Hong, 2023. "Optimal carbon tax rates in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with a supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Ernst, Anne & Stähler, Nikolai & Hinterlang, Natascha, 2023. "Climate Clubbing, Trade and the Natural Interest Rate," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277631, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Doreen Fedrigo-Fazio & Jean-Pierre Schweitzer & Patrick Ten Brink & Leonardo Mazza & Alison Ratliff & Emma Watkins, 2016. "Evidence of Absolute Decoupling from Real World Policy Mixes in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Colin M. Rose & Julia A. Stegemann, 2018. "From Waste Management to Component Management in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Hinterlang, Natascha & Martin, Anika & Röhe, Oke & Stähler, Nikolai & Strobel, Johannes, 2022. "Using energy and emissions taxation to finance labor tax reductions in a multi-sector economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Dongxue Wang & Yugang He, 2024. "The Mathematical Simulation of South Korea’s Financial and Economic Impacts from Real Estate Bubbles: Lessons from the China Evergrande Collapse," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Chan, Ying Tung, 2020. "Optimal emissions tax rates under habit formation and social comparisons," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Antosiewicz, Marek & Fuentes, J. Rodrigo & Lewandowski, Piotr & Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan, 2022. "Distributional effects of emission pricing in a carbon-intensive economy: The case of Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Ying Tung Chan, 2019. "Optimal Environmental Tax Rate in an Open Economy with Labor Migration—An E-DSGE Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-38, September.
    16. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Dan Ioan Topor & Marius Petrescu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Monica Ioana Toader, 2020. "The Effective Management of Organic Waste Policy in Albania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Michał Antoszewski, 2020. "Macroeconomic, Sectoral and Fiscal Consequences of Decreasing Energy Intensity in the Polish Economy," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 53-81.
    18. Hinterlang, Natascha & Martin, Anika & Röhe, Oke & Stähler, Nikolai & Strobel, Johannes, 2021. "Using energy and emissions taxation to finance labor tax reductions in a multi-sector economy: An assessment with EMuSe," Discussion Papers 50/2021, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    19. Mikhail Andreyev & Alyona Nelyubina, 2024. "Energy transition scenarios in Russia: effects in macroeconomic general equilibrium model with rational expectations," Bank of Russia Working Paper Series wps122, Bank of Russia.
    20. Gonzalo F. de-Córdoba & Benedetto Molinari & José L. Torres, 2021. "Public Debt Frontier: A Python Toolkit for Analyzing Public Debt Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:247-:d:90789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.