IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i11p1841-d118456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggregation Methods for Modelling Hydropower and Its Implications for a Highly Decarbonised Energy System in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Härtel

    (Energy Economy and Grid Operation, Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology (IWES), Königstor 59, 34119 Kassel, Germany)

  • Magnus Korpås

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), O. S. Bragstads Plass 2E, 7034 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Given the pursuit of long-term decarbonisation targets, future power systems face the task of integrating the renewable power and providing flexible backup production capacity. Due to its general ability to be dispatched, hydropower offers unique features and a backup production option not to be neglected, especially when taking the flexibility potential of multireservoir systems into account. Adequate hydropower representations are a necessity when analysing future power markets and aggregation methods are crucial for overcoming computational challenges. However, a major issue is that the aggregation must not be a too flexible representation. In a first step, a novel equivalent hydro system model implementation including a possibility to integrate pumping capacity and appropriate handling of multiple water paths (hydraulic coupling) by making use of an ex-ante optimisation is proposed. In a second step, a clustered equivalent hydro system model implementation employing k -means clustering is presented. A comparison of both aggregation approaches against the detailed reference system shows that both aggregated model variants yield significant reductions in computation time while keeping an adequate level of accuracy for a highly decarbonised power system scenario in Europe. The aggregation methods can easily be applied in different model types and may also be helpful in the stochastic case.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Härtel & Magnus Korpås, 2017. "Aggregation Methods for Modelling Hydropower and Its Implications for a Highly Decarbonised Energy System in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1841-:d:118456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Bellman, 1957. "On a Dynamic Programming Approach to the Caterer Problem--I," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 270-278, April.
    2. Wolfgang, Ove & Haugstad, Arne & Mo, Birger & Gjelsvik, Anders & Wangensteen, Ivar & Doorman, Gerard, 2009. "Hydro reservoir handling in Norway before and after deregulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1642-1651.
    3. David F. Rogers & Robert D. Plante & Richard T. Wong & James R. Evans, 1991. "Aggregation and Disaggregation Techniques and Methodology in Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 553-582, August.
    4. Hirth, Lion, 2016. "The benefits of flexibility: The value of wind energy with hydropower," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 210-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olkkonen, Ville & Haaskjold, Kristina & Klyve, Øyvind Sommer & Skartlien, Roar, 2023. "Techno-economic feasibility of hybrid hydro-FPV systems in Sub-Saharan Africa under different market conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jahns, Christopher & Podewski, Caroline & Weber, Christoph, 2020. "Supply curves for hydro reservoirs – Estimation and usage in large-scale electricity market models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Christopher Jahns & Caroline Podewski & Christoph Weber, "undated". "Supply Curves for Hydro Reservoirs - Estimation and Usage in Large-Scale Electricity Market Models," EWL Working Papers 1901, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics.
    3. Richard Connors & David Watling, 2015. "Assessing the Demand Vulnerability of Equilibrium Traffic Networks via Network Aggregation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 367-395, June.
    4. Pierre Bernhard & Marc Deschamps, 2017. "Kalman on dynamics and contro, Linear System Theory, Optimal Control, and Filter," Working Papers 2017-10, CRESE.
    5. Jones, Randall E. & Cacho, Oscar J., 2000. "A Dynamic Optimisation Model of Weed Control," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123685, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Voelkel, Michael A. & Sachs, Anna-Lena & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2020. "An aggregation-based approximate dynamic programming approach for the periodic review model with random yield," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 286-298.
    7. Pam Norton & Ravi Phatarfod, 2008. "Optimal Strategies In One-Day Cricket," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(04), pages 495-511.
    8. Aghayi, Nazila & Maleki, Bentolhoda, 2016. "Efficiency measurement of DMUs with undesirable outputs under uncertainty based on the directional distance function: Application on bank industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 376-387.
    9. Tan, Madeleine Sui-Lay, 2016. "Policy coordination among the ASEAN-5: A global VAR analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 20-40.
    10. D. W. K. Yeung, 2008. "Dynamically Consistent Solution For A Pollution Management Game In Collaborative Abatement With Uncertain Future Payoffs," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(04), pages 517-538.
    11. Kruyt, Bert & Lehning, Michael & Kahl, Annelen, 2017. "Potential contributions of wind power to a stable and highly renewable Swiss power supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-11.
    12. Merrick, James H. & Weyant, John P., 2019. "On choosing the resolution of normative models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 511-523.
    13. Crutchfield, Stephen R. & Brazee, Richard J., 1990. "An Integrated Model of Surface and Ground Water Quality," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271011, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Quentin Perrier, 2017. "The French Nuclear Bet," Working Papers 2017.18, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    15. Wilhelm, Wilbert E. & Xu, Kaihong, 2002. "Prescribing product upgrades, prices and production levels over time in a stochastic environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 601-621, May.
    16. Hanafi, Said & Freville, Arnaud, 1998. "An efficient tabu search approach for the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 659-675, April.
    17. Vicens, E. & Alemany, M. E. & Andres, C. & Guarch, J. J., 2001. "A design and application methodology for hierarchical production planning decision support systems in an enterprise integration context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-3), pages 5-20, December.
    18. Schön, Cornelia & König, Eva, 2018. "A stochastic dynamic programming approach for delay management of a single train line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 501-518.
    19. Eric D. Gould, 2008. "Marriage and Career: The Dynamic Decisions of Young Men," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 337-378.
    20. Lange, Rutger-Jan, 2024. "Bellman filtering and smoothing for state–space models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1841-:d:118456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.