IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdisab/v3y2023i2p14-216d1132278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional and Family Carers’ Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Supported Decision-Making with Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Online Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Casey

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
    Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland)

  • Deirdre Desmond

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
    Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland)

  • Laura Coffey

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
    Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland)

Abstract

Background : COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland varied in levels of severity throughout 2020 and 2021. The aim of the present study was to explore the experiences of professional and family carers in supporting people with intellectual disabilities to make their own decisions during these restrictions. Methods : Participants recruited between July and December 2021 via social media, disability services, and academic experts completed a qualitative online survey. Results were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results : Data from 16 participants (eight professional carers, eight family carers) were included. Three main themes were identified: 1. centring the person, 2. adapting to COVID, and 3. restricted lives. Anxiety, confusion, and boredom among adults with intellectual disabilities during restrictions were reported by both professional and familial carers. Professional carers reported some positive outcomes, including greater chances for independence among service users and new activities becoming available via online resources. Family carers reported more negative outcomes, including isolation from disability services. Conclusions : People with intellectual disabilities had their choices markedly curtailed during the restrictions. Future studies should focus on improving the ability of services to reach users who may not have the ability to attend services in person.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Casey & Deirdre Desmond & Laura Coffey, 2023. "Professional and Family Carers’ Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Supported Decision-Making with Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Online Survey," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:14-216:d:1132278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/3/2/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/3/2/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolina Puyaltó & Maialen Beltran & Tània Coll & Gemma Diaz-Garolera & Marta Figueras & Judit Fullana & Cristina González & Maria Pallisera & Joan Pujolar & Ana Rey, 2022. "Relationships of People with Intellectual Disabilities in Times of Pandemic: An Inclusive Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Boas, Taylor C. & Christenson, Dino P. & Glick, David M., 2020. "Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 232-250, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barton, Jared & Pan, Xiaofei, 2022. "Movin’ on up? A survey experiment on mobility enhancing policies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Robert Kubinec & Haillie Na‐Kyung Lee & Andrey Tomashevskiy, 2021. "Politically connected companies are less likely to shutdown due to COVID‐19 restrictions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2155-2169, September.
    3. Ji Yun Lee & Fangjiao Ma & Yue Li, 2022. "Understanding homeowner proactive actions for managing wildfire risks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1525-1547, November.
    4. Michael Kumove, 2022. "Does Language Foster Reconciliation? Evidence From the Former Yugoslavia," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 783-808, May.
    5. Patricia O’Brien & Edurne Garcia Iriarte & Roy Mc Conkey & Sarah Butler & Bruce O’Brien, 2022. "Inclusive Research and Intellectual Disabilities: Moving Forward on a Road Less Well-Travelled," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Gemma Diaz-Garolera & Judit Fullana & Maria Pallisera & Carolina Puyaltó & Ana Rey & Maialen Beltran, 2022. "Learnings and Benefits from Co-Researching: Views of Advisors with Intellectual Disabilities," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Lisa M. Fucito & Krysten W. Bold & Sydney Cannon & Alison Serrantino & Rebecca Marrero & Stephanie S. O’Malley, 2022. "Cigarette Smoking in Response to COVID-19: Examining Co-Morbid Medical Conditions and Risk Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Sean F. Ellis & Olesya M. Savchenko & Kent D. Messer, 2022. "Mitigating stigma associated with recycled water," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(3), pages 1077-1099, May.
    9. Matthew H. Goldberg & Abel Gustafson & Matthew T. Ballew & Seth A. Rosenthal & Matthew J. Cutler & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2020. "Predictors of global warming risk perceptions among Latino and non-Latino White Americans," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1555-1574, October.
    10. Heidi Reed, 2022. "When the Right Thing to Do Is Also the Wrong Thing: Moral Sensemaking of Responsible Business Behavior During the COVID-19 Crisis," Post-Print hal-04531082, HAL.
    11. Huichuan Xia, 2023. "What scholars and IRBs talk when they talk about the Belmont principles in crowd work‐based research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 67-80, January.
    12. Roselyn J. Lee-Won & Inyoung Jang & Hyun-Suk Kim & Sung-Gwan Park, 2022. "The Relationship between Future Anxiety Due to COVID-19 and Vigilance: The Role of Message Fatigue and Autonomy Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Sarpong, Dennis, 2024. "National Identification and Public Cooperation with the Police in Ghana," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Pankaj Tiwari, 2023. "Influence of Millennials’ eco-literacy and biospheric values on green purchases: the mediating effect of attitude," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1195-1212, September.
    15. S. Brent Jackson & Kathryn T. Stevenson & Lincoln R. Larson & M. Nils Peterson & Erin Seekamp, 2021. "Outdoor Activity Participation Improves Adolescents’ Mental Health and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Park, Keunhyun & Chamberlain, Brent & Song, Ziqi & Nasr Esfahani, Hossein & Sheen, Jeff & Larsen, Teresa & Long Novack, Valerie & Licon, Carlos & Christensen, Keith, 2022. "A double jeopardy: COVID-19 impacts on the travel behavior and community living of people with disabilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 24-35.
    17. Kaitlynn Sandstrom‐Mistry & Frank Lupi & Hyunjung Kim & Joseph A. Herriges, 2023. "Comparing water quality valuation across probability and non‐probability samples," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 744-761, June.
    18. Marissa L. Varade & Francis Choi & Brian Helmuth & Steven Scyphers, 2022. "Catching versus Counting: Comparing the Pro-Environmental Attitudes, Behaviors, and Climate Concerns of Recreational Fishers and Citizen Scientists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. S. Brent Jackson & Kathryn T. Stevenson & Lincoln R. Larson & M. Nils Peterson & Erin Seekamp, 2021. "Connection to Nature Boosts Adolescents’ Mental Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    20. Buccieri, Dominic & Javalgi, Raj G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2023. "Role of opportunity creation between reconfiguration and innovation: Insights from emerging market international new ventures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:14-216:d:1132278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.