IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v6y2024i4p73-1536d1524816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aeration Optimization for the Biodrying of Market Waste Using Negative Ventilation: A Lysimeter Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Nyi Nyi Lwin

    (The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
    Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment (CEE), Ministry of Higher Education Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI), Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Abhisit Bhatsada

    (The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
    Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment (CEE), Ministry of Higher Education Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI), Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Sirintornthep Towprayoon

    (The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
    Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment (CEE), Ministry of Higher Education Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI), Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Suthum Patumsawad

    (Department Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand)

  • Noppharit Sutthasil

    (Department of Environmental Health, School of Health Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand)

  • Komsilp Wangyao

    (The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
    Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment (CEE), Ministry of Higher Education Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI), Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

Abstract

This study investigates the optimization of aeration rates for the biodrying of market waste using negative-pressure ventilation. Market waste, characterized by a high moisture content (MC) and rapid decomposition, presents challenges in waste management. Over 12 days, three aeration rates (ARs) of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 m 3 /kg/day were examined, and the most effective continuous ventilation configuration was identified in terms of heat generation, moisture reduction, and biodrying efficiency. The results indicate that the most effective AR for heat retention and moisture removal was 0.2 m 3 /kg/day, achieving a 6.63% MC reduction and a 9.12% low heating value (LHV) increase. Gas analysis showed that, while AR 0.2 supported high microbial activity during the initial 7 days, AR 0.6 sustained higher overall CO 2 production due to its greater aeration rate. The findings also suggest that the biodrying of market waste with a high initial MC can achieve significant weight loss and leachate generation when paired with a high aeration rate of 0.6 m 3 /kg/day, with a 69.8% weight loss and increased waste compaction being recorded. The study suggests that variable ARs can optimize biodrying, making market waste more suitable for conversion to refuse-derived fuel or landfill pre-treatment and improving waste-to-energy processes and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Nyi Nyi Lwin & Abhisit Bhatsada & Sirintornthep Towprayoon & Suthum Patumsawad & Noppharit Sutthasil & Komsilp Wangyao, 2024. "Aeration Optimization for the Biodrying of Market Waste Using Negative Ventilation: A Lysimeter Study," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:4:p:73-1536:d:1524816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/4/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/6/4/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Soltanian, Salman & Ghanavati, Hossein, 2019. "Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 64-76.
    2. Abhisit Bhatsada & Suthum Patumsawad & Sirintornthep Towprayoon & Chart Chiemchaisri & Awassada Phongphiphat & Komsilp Wangyao, 2023. "Modification of the Aeration-Supplied Configuration in the Biodrying Process for Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Balli, Ozgur & Kale, Utku & Rohács, Dániel & Hikmet Karakoc, T., 2022. "Environmental damage cost and exergoenvironmental evaluations of piston prop aviation engines for the landing and take-off flight phases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    3. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ansarinasab, Hojat & Mousavi, Seyed Ali, 2021. "Life cycle assessment and exergoeconomic analysis of the multi-generation system based on fuel cell for methanol, power, and heat production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1314-1332.
    4. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Garcia, Gabriel & Arriola, Emmanuel & Chen, Wei-Hsin & De Luna, Mark Daniel, 2021. "A comprehensive review of hydrogen production from methanol thermochemical conversion for sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Yıldız Koç, 2019. "Parametric Optimisation of an ORC in a Wood Chipboard Production Facility to Recover Waste Heat Produced from the Drying and Steam Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Gurunathan Manikandan & P. Rajesh Kanna & Dawid Taler & Tomasz Sobota, 2023. "Review of Waste Cooking Oil (WCO) as a Feedstock for Biofuel—Indian Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Feng, Jianghong & Xu, Su Xiu & Xu, Gangyan & Cheng, Huibing, 2022. "An integrated decision-making method for locating parking centers of recyclable waste transportation vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Aseel Najeeb Ajaweed & Fikrat M. Hassan & Nadhem H. Hyder, 2022. "Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    11. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Khounani, Zahra & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Amiri, Hamid & Lam, Su Shiung & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of bioenergy systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Hollas, C.E. & Bolsan, A.C. & Chini, A. & Venturin, B. & Bonassa, G. & Cândido, D. & Antes, F.G. & Steinmetz, R.L.R. & Prado, N.V. & Kunz, A., 2021. "Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: A life-cycle assessment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Fallahi, Alireza & Farzad, Somayeh & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Mandegari, Mohsen & Görgens, Johann F. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Lam, Su Shiung & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2021. "Sustainability assessment of sugarcane residues valorization to biobutadiene by exergy and exergoeconomic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    14. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & Kang, Xihui & Deng, Chen & Dobson, Alan D.W. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2021. "Improved robustness of ex-situ biological methanation for electro-fuel production through the addition of graphene," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar, 2020. "Integrated sustainability analysis of combustion engines (ISACE) as an alternative to classical combustion analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Rocha, Danilo H.D. & Siqueira, Diana S. & Silva, Rogério J., 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluating coal-fired power plants technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    17. Eduardo J. C. Cavalcanti & João Victor M. Ferreira & Monica Carvalho, 2021. "Research on a Solar Hybrid Trigeneration System Based on Exergy and Exergoenvironmental Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Jin, Yi & Behrens, Paul & Tukker, Arnold & Scherer, Laura, 2019. "Water use of electricity technologies: A global meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Przemysław Seruga, 2021. "The Municipal Solid Waste Management System with Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-9, April.
    20. Tayibi, S. & Monlau, F. & Bargaz, A. & Jimenez, R. & Barakat, A., 2021. "Synergy of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis processes for sustainable waste management: A critical review and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:6:y:2024:i:4:p:73-1536:d:1524816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.