IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jbusin/v2y2022i2p17-272d829963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Has Empowered the Consumer, but Marketing Communications Need to Catch-Up: An Approach to Fast-Forward the Future

Author

Listed:
  • Chris D. Beaumont

    (Institute for Future Initiatives, Life Style by Design, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)

  • Darrell Berry

    (Significance Systems, Brighton BN1 6SP, UK)

  • John Ricketts

    (Significance Systems, Sydney, NSW 2069, Australia)

Abstract

No industry is immune to digital transformation. Social media is empowering individuals everywhere and driving a democratization of personal access that is fundamentally different from the top-down communications associated with traditional mass-media at the outset of globalization. Social media, social sharing, and social business have been accelerated by COVID-19. The rise of e-commerce has materially affected not only how people buy, but also how people research their purchase decisions. Marketing has not kept up with this paradigm shift, and by simply viewing digital as another media channel misses the shift in consumer power and the imperative to engage rather than advertise. Narratives are part of our everyday, and popular stories affect individual and community behaviour. We demonstrate how big data and AI can track the narratives that are shaping our world. Engaging with these narratives can improve marketing decision-making by addressing what people feel is important and result in better outcomes to grow and sustain brand equity in our contemporary, digital world.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris D. Beaumont & Darrell Berry & John Ricketts, 2022. "Technology Has Empowered the Consumer, but Marketing Communications Need to Catch-Up: An Approach to Fast-Forward the Future," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jbusin:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:17-272:d:829963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7116/2/2/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7116/2/2/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uncles, Mark D. & Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. & Goodhardt, Gerald J., 2004. "Reply to commentary on "Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks"," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1329-1330, December.
    2. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    3. Scott A. Neslin & Russell S. Winer, 2014. "The History of Marketing Science: Beginnings," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Russell S Winer & Scott A Neslin (ed.), THE HISTORY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, chapter 1, pages 1-15, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Huber, Laura Rosendahl & Sloof, Randolph & Van Praag, Mirjam, 2014. "The effect of early entrepreneurship education: Evidence from a field experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 76-97.
    5. Jinwan Cho & Eunmi Kim & Insik Jeong, 2017. "International orientation and cross-functional integration in new product development," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 226-252, December.
    6. Tim Hughes & Merlin Stone & Eleni Aravopoulou & Len Tiu Wright & Liz Machtynger, 2018. "Academic research into marketing: Many publications, but little impact?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1516108-151, January.
    7. Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. & Uncles, Mark D. & Goodhardt, Gerald J., 2004. "Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1307-1325, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nardi, Vinicius Antonio Machado & Jardim, William Carvalho & Ladeira, Wagner Júnior & Santini, Fernando, 2020. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between customer participation and brand outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 450-460.
    2. Anesbury, Zachary William & Talbot, Danielle & Day, Chanel Andrea & Bogomolov, Tim & Bogomolova, Svetlana, 2020. "The fallacy of the heavy buyer: Exploring purchasing frequencies of fresh fruit and vegetable categories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Dawes, John, 2020. "The Natural Monopoly effect in brand purchasing: Do big brands really appeal to lighter category buyers?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 90-99.
    4. Trinh, Giang & Dawes, John, 2020. "A comparison of brand loyalty between on the go and take-home consumption purchases," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Sharp, Byron & Dawes, John & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2010. "Competition for memory retrieval between private label and national brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1142-1147, November.
    6. Trinh, Giang & Khan, Huda & Lockshin, Larry, 2020. "Purchasing behaviour of ethnicities: Are they different?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    7. Vipul Pare & John Dawes, 2012. "The persistence of excess brand loyalty over multiple years," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 163-175, March.
    8. Uncles, Mark D. & Kwok, Simon, 2009. "Patterns of store patronage in urban China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 68-81, January.
    9. Giang Trinh & Jenni Romaniuk & Arry Tanusondjaja, 2016. "Benchmarking buyer behavior towards new brands," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 743-752, December.
    10. Baker, Bradley J. & McDonald, Heath & Funk, Daniel C., 2016. "The uniqueness of sport: Testing against marketing's empirical laws," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 378-390.
    11. Trinh, Giang & Corsi, Armando & Lockshin, Larry, 2019. "How country of origins of food products compete and grow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 231-241.
    12. Rajeev Kohli & Raaj Sah, 2006. "Some Empirical Regularities in Market Shares," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1792-1798, November.
    13. Rafael Barreiros Porto & Nolah Schutte da Rocha Lima, 2015. "Nonlinear Impact of the Marketing Mix on Brand Sales Performance," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(5), pages 57-77, September.
    14. Bennett, Dag, 2008. "Brand Loyalty Dynamics — China's Television brands come of age," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 39-50.
    15. Zachary Anesbury & Maxwell Winchester & Rachel Kennedy, 2017. "Brand user profiles seldom change and seldom differ," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 523-535, December.
    16. Ben Akpoyomare Oghojafor & Kunle Adeosun Ladipo Patrick & Ganiyu Rahim Ajao, 2016. "Airline Service Quality Dimensions and Customer Loyalty: Empirical Evidence from Air Passengers’ in Lagos State," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 155-171, December.
    17. Uncles, Mark D. & East, Robert & Lomax, Wendy, 2010. "Market share is correlated with word-of-mouth volume," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 145-150.
    18. Xinxue (Shawn) Qu & Aslan Lotfi & Dipak C. Jain & Zhengrui Jiang, 2022. "Predicting upgrade timing for successive product generations: An exponential‐decay proportional hazard model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2067-2083, May.
    19. Giang Trinh & Cam Rungie & Malcolm Wright & Carl Driesener & John Dawes, 2014. "Predicting future purchases with the Poisson log-normal model," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 219-234, June.
    20. Uncles, Mark D. & Kwok, Simon, 2013. "Designing research with in-built differentiated replication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1398-1405.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jbusin:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:17-272:d:829963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.