IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v8y2018i10p161-d175180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Economy for the Environmental Preservation of the Landscape as a Key Resource in Historic Territories

Author

Listed:
  • Luciano Pilotti

    (Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

Sustainable production besides economic, energetic, and environmental aspects should consider social and cultural features of the territory in which it relies. This occurs above all for agriculture that is intrinsically related to the territory. Today, the territory as a landscape represents a complex eco-system (subjects, communities, traditions, cultures, and specific agricultural systems) and a valuable vehicle for art and history and it is also a strategic asset to defend and promote with environmental policies. The topic of urban preservation and regeneration has been increasing by opening up to other factors such as the engagement of local communities and the contribution they can give toward the development of the identity and the symbolic universe of every community especially for historic territories. The main research question of this study is: Can historic territories be described as the landscape of a complex eco-system able to support a new cultural policy? In addition, which type of connections between physical resources and the virtual-cultural ones of that landscape are strategic assets for promoting historic territories? This theoretical manuscript is oriented toward improving territorial policies. In more details, it tries to develop a new model to reach a “global community of creativity” as a bridge between the networks of historic territories, which is meant as roots of variety to transfer to future generations, and between local and global quality in an emergent landscape. In order to reach this new model, the local community and ecosystem capabilities require a multi-level connection among both art, science, and culture as well as nature, technology, and civic capability. The result is that the new model is able to share common goods, which are both internal and external. Following this path, it is urgent to develop policies in an emergent perspective that are able to combine artistic, ecological, environmental, and cultural assets. In particular, the goals are to: (i) explore the complex value of territorial contexts that develop/evolve from both a medium-term and long-term point of view that is not described by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) standard indicators, (ii) reach the suggestion of a continuous re-articulation of sectors of knowledge proposed by cultural resources, and (iii) highlight that cultural marketing is involved in the interpretation and transmission within a large network of participants, users, institutions, markets, virtual, and territorial places. The starting point is identified as the landscape of historic territory, but an important achievement will be to transfer the main results to other territories by studying specific case histories of urban and non-urban landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Luciano Pilotti, 2018. "Cultural Economy for the Environmental Preservation of the Landscape as a Key Resource in Historic Territories," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:10:p:161-:d:175180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/10/161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/10/161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Francesca Savarese & Luigi Orsi & Fiorenza Belussi, 2016. "New venture high growth in high-tech environments," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 1937-1958, November.
    2. Apa, Roberta & De Noni, Ivan & Orsi, Luigi & Sedita, Silvia Rita, 2018. "Knowledge space oddity: How to increase the intensity and relevance of the technological progress of European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1700-1712.
    3. Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal & Tarba, Shlomo Yedidia & Liu, Yipeng & Glaister, Keith W., 2016. "Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 66-75.
    4. De Noni, Ivan & Ganzaroli, Andrea & Orsi, Luigi, 2017. "The impact of intra- and inter-regional knowledge collaboration and technological variety on the knowledge productivity of European regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 108-118.
    5. Shiri M Breznitz & Douglas S Noonan, 2018. "Planting the seed to grow local creative industries: The impacts of cultural districts and arts schools on economic development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(5), pages 1047-1070, August.
    6. Cherine Akkari & Christopher Robin Bryant, 2017. "Toward Improved Adoption of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the Lake Erie Basin: Perspectives from Resilience and Agricultural Innovation Literature," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Andy C. Pratt, 2017. "Beyond resilience: learning from the cultural economy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 127-139, January.
    8. Lawrence Grossberg, 2017. "Between political economy and cultural studies: a response to Bryan and Rafferty," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 356-363, July.
    9. Insa Kühling & Shohrukh Atoev & Dieter Trautz, 2018. "Sustainable Intensification in Dryland Cropping Systems—Perspectives for Adaptions across the Western Siberian Grain Belt," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehrdad Chahardowli & Hassan Sajadzadeh & Farshid Aram & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "Survey of Sustainable Regeneration of Historic and Cultural Cores of Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaqi Wei & Ying Guo, 2024. "The effect of urban capacity in knowledge recombination on digital economy development," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5373-5402, September.
    2. Xie, Qijun & Su, Jun, 2021. "The spatial-temporal complexity and dynamics of research collaboration: Evidence from 297 cities in China (1985–2016)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    4. D’Angelo, Alfredo & Presutti, Manuela, 2019. "SMEs international growth: The moderating role of experience on entrepreneurial and learning orientations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 613-624.
    5. López-Sáez, Pedro & Cruz-González, Jorge & Navas-López, Jose Emilio & Perona-Alfageme, María del Mar, 2021. "Organizational integration mechanisms and knowledge transfer effectiveness in MNCs: The moderating role of cross-national distance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4).
    6. Hajer Guesmi & Cyrine Darej & Piebiep Goufo & Salah Ben Youssef & Mohamed Chakroun & Hichem Ben Salem & Henrique Trindade & Nizar Moujahed, 2022. "Stubble Quality of Wheat Grown under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems, and Effects of Stubble on the Fermentation Profile of Grazing Ewes’ Ruminal Fluid," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Daniel R Clark & Dan Li & Dean A Shepherd, 2018. "Country familiarity in the initial stage of foreign market selection," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(4), pages 442-472, May.
    8. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    9. Demetris Vrontis & Jaroslav Belas & Alkis Thrassou & Gabriele Santoro & Michael Christofi, 2023. "Strategic agility, openness and performance: a mixed method comparative analysis of firms operating in developed and emerging markets," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1365-1398, May.
    10. Muhammad Waseem Bari & Muhammad Abrar & Mohsin Bashir & Sajjad Ahmad Baig & Meng Fanchen, 2019. "Soft Issues During Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Industry Performance, China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Based View," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    11. Croucher, Richard & Glaister, Keith W. & Rizov, Marian & Rofcanin, Yasin & Wood, Geoffrey, 2020. "Challenges and Resilience: Managers’ perceptions of firm performance following M&As," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 69(4), pages 1470-1505.
    12. Zhou, Abby Jingzi & Fey, Carl & Yildiz, H. Emre, 2020. "Fostering integration through HRM practices: An empirical examination of absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&As," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    13. Lei Ye & Gang Zeng & Xianzhong Cao, 2020. "Open innovation and innovative performance of universities: Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1142-1157, September.
    14. Gabriele Santoro & Antonio Messeni-Petruzzelli & Manlio Giudice, 2021. "Searching for resilience: the impact of employee-level and entrepreneur-level resilience on firm performance in small family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 455-471, June.
    15. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Kogler, Dieter F. & Lengyel, Balázs, 2023. "Atypical combinations of technologies in regional co-inventor networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).
    16. Kiziloglu Mehmet, 2022. "The effect of organisational culture on organisational performance: the mediating role of intrapreneurship," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 41(1), pages 20-36, July.
    17. Orrensalo, Thao & Nikou, Shahrokh, 2021. "Digital Source Adoption and Information-Seeking Behaviours of Entrepreneurs: A Systematic Literature Review," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238044, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    18. Kyriakos Drivas & Claire Economidou & Ioannis Kaplanis & Maria Theano Tagaraki, 2021. "Smart Specialization in a Subnational Context: Evidence From Greece," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 71(3-4), pages 3-12, July-Dece.
    19. Sania Zafar & Danish Ahmed Siddiqui, 2019. "Factors Affecting Employees Performance and Retention: A Comparative Analysis of Banking and Educational Sector of Karachi," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 93-124, December.
    20. Chatterjee, Diti & Dinar, Ariel & González-Rivera, Gloria, 2018. "An empirical knowledge production function of agricultural research and extension: The case of the University of California Cooperative Extension," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 290-297.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:10:p:161-:d:175180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.