IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v3y2013i2p271-284d25254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Worm Control in Lambs

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Kenyon

    (Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, EH26 0PZ, Scotland, UK)

  • Jan M. Dick

    (SEE360, Bush House, Edinburgh Technopole, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0BB Scotland, UK)

  • Ron I. Smith

    (SEE360, Bush House, Edinburgh Technopole, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0BB Scotland, UK)

  • Drew G. Coulter

    (SEE360, Bush House, Edinburgh Technopole, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0BB Scotland, UK)

  • David McBean

    (Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, EH26 0PZ, Scotland, UK)

  • Philip J. Skuce

    (Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, EH26 0PZ, Scotland, UK)

Abstract

There are currently little or no data on the role of endemic disease control in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from livestock. In the present study, we have used an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-compliant model to calculate GHG emissions from naturally grazing lambs under four different anthelmintic drug treatment regimes over a 5-year study period. Treatments were either “monthly” (NST), “strategic” (SPT), “targeted” (TST) or based on “clinical signs” (MT). Commercial sheep farming practices were simulated, with lambs reaching a pre-selected target market weight (38 kg) removed from the analysis as they would no longer contribute to the GHG budget of the flock. Results showed there was a significant treatment effect over all years, with lambs in the MT group consistently taking longer to reach market weight, and an extra 10% emission of CO 2 e per kg of weight gain over the other treatments. There were no significant differences between the other three treatment strategies (NST, SPT and TST) in terms of production efficiency or cumulated GHG emissions over the experimental period. This study has shown that endemic disease control can contribute to a reduction in GHG emissions from animal agriculture and help reduce the carbon footprint of livestock farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Kenyon & Jan M. Dick & Ron I. Smith & Drew G. Coulter & David McBean & Philip J. Skuce, 2013. "Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Worm Control in Lambs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:271-284:d:25254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/2/271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/2/271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casey, J.W. & Holden, N.M., 2005. "Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 97-114, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afshin Ghahramani & S. Mark Howden & Agustin del Prado & Dean T. Thomas & Andrew D. Moore & Boyu Ji & Serkan Ates, 2019. "Climate Change Impact, Adaptation, and Mitigation in Temperate Grazing Systems: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-30, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoffman, Eric & Cavigelli, Michel A. & Camargo, Gustavo & Ryan, Matthew & Ackroyd, Victoria J. & Richard, Tom L. & Mirsky, Steven, 2018. "Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional grain crop production: Accounting for nutrient inflows," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 89-96.
    2. Malý, M. & Hálová, P. & Havlíková, M. & Žáková-Kroupová, Z., 2017. "Valuation of Public Goods: The Case of Emissions from Livestock Holdings in the Czech Republic," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(1), March.
    3. Agostinho, F. & Oliveira, M.W. & Pulselli, F.M. & Almeida, C.M.V.B. & Giannetti, B.F., 2019. "Emergy accounting as a support for a strategic planning towards a regional sustainable milk production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Raymond L. Desjardins & Devon E. Worth & Xavier P. C. Vergé & Dominique Maxime & Jim Dyer & Darrel Cerkowniak, 2012. "Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(12), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Thomassen, M.A. & Dolman, M.A. & van Calker, K.J. & de Boer, I.J.M., 2009. "Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2278-2284, June.
    6. Pelletier, N., 2008. "Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 67-73, September.
    7. Pishgar-Komleh, Seyyed Hassan & Omid, Mahmoud & Heidari, Mohammad Davoud, 2013. "On the study of energy use and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in greenhouse cucumber production in Yazd province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 63-71.
    8. Verge, X.P.C. & Dyer, J.A. & Desjardins, R.L. & Worth, D., 2007. "Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry in 2001," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 683-693, June.
    9. Castanheira, É.G. & Dias, A.C. & Arroja, L. & Amaro, R., 2010. "The environmental performance of milk production on a typical Portuguese dairy farm," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 498-507, September.
    10. Ludemann, C.I. & Eckard, R.J. & Cullen, B.R. & Jacobs, J.L. & Malcolm, B. & Smith, K.F., 2015. "Higher energy concentration traits in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) may increase profitability and improve energy conversion on dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 89-100.
    11. Nijdam, Durk & Rood, Trudy & Westhoek, Henk, 2012. "The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 760-770.
    12. Beauchemin, Karen A. & Henry Janzen, H. & Little, Shannan M. & McAllister, Tim A. & McGinn, Sean M., 2010. "Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(6), pages 371-379, July.
    13. Indrė Bručienė & Domantas Aleliūnas & Egidijus Šarauskis & Kęstutis Romaneckas, 2021. "Influence of Mechanical and Intelligent Robotic Weed Control Methods on Energy Efficiency and Environment in Organic Sugar Beet Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Alvarez-Hess, Pablo S. & Little, Shannan M. & Moate, Peter J. & Jacobs, Joe L. & Beauchemin, Karen A. & Eckard, Richard J., 2019. "A partial life cycle assessment of the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of feeding 3-nitrooxypropanol and nitrate to cattle," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 14-23.
    15. Andrew D. Henderson & Anne Asselin-Balençon & Martin C. Heller & Jasmina Burek & Daesoo Kim & Lindsay Lessard & Manuele Margni & Rosie Saad & Marty D. Matlock & Greg Thoma & Ying Wang & Olivier Jollie, 2023. "Spatialized Life Cycle Assessment of Fluid Milk Production and Consumption in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Rahmann, Gerold (Ed.) & Aksoy, Uygun (Ed.), 2014. "Building Organic Bridges: Volume 1, Argentina - France," Thünen Reports 20,1, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    17. Zdenka ZAKOVA KROUPOVA & Lukas CECHURA & Michaela HAVLIKOVA & Pavlina HALOVA & Michal MALY, 2018. "Shadow prices of greenhouse gas emissions: An application to the Czech dairy production," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(7), pages 291-300.
    18. Ludemann, Cameron I. & Byrne, Timothy J. & Sise, Judith A. & Amer, Peter R., 2012. "Selection indices offer potential for New Zealand sheep farmers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions per unit of product," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 1(4), pages 1-12, July.
    19. Huang, Wei, 2022. "Demand for plant-based milk and effects of a carbon tax on fresh milk consumption in Sweden," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 518-529.
    20. Casey, J.W. & Holden, N.M., 2006. "Quantification of GHG emissions from sucker-beef production in Ireland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-3), pages 79-98, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:271-284:d:25254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.