Author
Listed:
- Angelo Frascarelli
(Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Via Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy)
- Stefano Ciliberti
(Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Via Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy)
- Sofia Maria Lilli
(Ce.S.A.R. (Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, University of Perugia), Via Risorgimento 3/b, 06051 Deruta, Italy)
- Paolo Pascolini
(Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Via Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy)
- Jacopo Gabriele Orlando
(Impact and Sustainability Division—Aboca S.p.A. Società Agricola, Loc. Aboca 20, 52037 Sansepolcro, Italy)
- Margherita Tiradritti
(Impact and Sustainability Division—Aboca S.p.A. Società Agricola, Loc. Aboca 20, 52037 Sansepolcro, Italy)
Abstract
The environmental impact of beef cattle production varies significantly across farming systems, influenced by factors like feed, management practices, and land use. By applying the LCA perspective with “from cradle to farm gate” boundaries and using the CAP’2ER ® tool, this study evaluates the carbon footprint of two farming models in Italy: a semi-extensive cow-calf beef production and an intensive farm for calf fattening. The carbon footprint was calculated using two functional units: kilograms of live meat gross production (LMGP), and a monetary unit. The first model showed a lower carbon footprint, with 13.4 kg CO 2 eq/kg LMGP and 1.96 kg CO 2 eq/EUR, compared to the second one 19.2 kg CO 2 eq/kg LMGP and 5.20 kg CO 2 eq/EUR. The use of monetary value as a functional unit is rarely explored in the literature, since most studies have focused on weight-based metrics, favoring intensive systems with longer lifecycles compared to extensive farming. Furthermore, contrary to findings in the literature for semi-extensive systems like adaptive multi-paddock grazing, the tool used for the calculation did not detect any carbon sequestration. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into diverse functional units to assess the environmental and economic performance of farming systems. Expanding this approach could inform policies and consumer decisions, promoting sustainable beef production aligned with climate goals and the European Green Deal agenda.
Suggested Citation
Angelo Frascarelli & Stefano Ciliberti & Sofia Maria Lilli & Paolo Pascolini & Jacopo Gabriele Orlando & Margherita Tiradritti, 2025.
"Comparative Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Analysis of Semi-Extensive and Intensive Beef Farming,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:472-:d:1597259
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:472-:d:1597259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.