IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i5p697-d1385414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers of Sustainability Credentialling in the Red Meat Value Chain—A Mixed Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Bradley Ridoutt

    (Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Private Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC 3169, Australia
    Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

Abstract

Sustainability credentialling is the communication of environmental, social, economic, or animal-welfare-related information about a producer or product. Demand for sustainability credentials has been increasing and the aim of this study was to describe the main drivers for this kind of information in Australian red meat value chains that reach consumers across Australia and internationally, mainly in Asia, the USA, and the Middle East. The mixed methods approach included consultation with red meat processors. Desk-based research explored drivers from outside the value chain identified in the consultation. Little evidence was found that consumers are a driver of sustainability credentialling. The main drivers were in the global financial system, expressed in coordinated climate action policies by financial service providers and emerging government climate-related financial legislation. The inclusion of Scope 3 emissions extends coverage to most value chain participants. Net zero transitioning presents many risks to red meat value chains, potentially involving costly interventions and greater difficulty accessing financial services, with direct implications for production costs and asset values. Urgent action is recommended to achieve the formal recognition and use of climate metrics that differentiate the management strategies that are applicable to short-lived biogenic methane compared to CO 2 to achieve the Paris Agreement goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradley Ridoutt, 2024. "Drivers of Sustainability Credentialling in the Red Meat Value Chain—A Mixed Methods Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:697-:d:1385414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/5/697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/5/697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhagyashree Katare & Hyejin Yim & Anne Byrne & H. Holly Wang & Michael Wetzstein, 2023. "Consumer willingness to pay for environmentally sustainable meat and a plant‐based meat substitute," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 145-163, March.
    2. Yarkın Akyüz & Havva Ece Salali & Pelin Atakan & Cihat Günden & Murat Yercan & Lampros Lamprinakis & Signe Kårstad & Irina Solovieva & Nadja Kasperczyk & Konstadinos Mattas & Dimitra Lazaridou & Gizem, 2023. "Case Study Analysis on Agri-Food Value Chain: A Guideline-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Peng & Rasa Melnikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei, 2024. "Structural dynamics and sustainability in the agricultural sector: the case of the European Union," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Nouve, Yawotse & Zheng, Yuqing & Zhao, Shuoli & Kaiser, Harry M. & Dong, Diansheng, 2024. "A detailed demand analysis of plant-based meat alternatives vs. animal-based meat in the United States," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343798, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Xiaheng Zhang & Lin Xiao & Guichao Jin, 2023. "Residential Environmental Protection Commodity Consumption Model and Trend Forecast Based on Consumer Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:697-:d:1385414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.