IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i4p620-d1376731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precision Livestock Farming Technology: Applications and Challenges of Animal Welfare and Climate Change

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios I. Papakonstantinou

    (Clinic of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Trikalon 224, 43100 Karditsa, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Voulgarakis

    (Clinic of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Trikalon 224, 43100 Karditsa, Greece)

  • Georgia Terzidou

    (Food Law Experts, Themistokleous, 10677 Athens, Greece)

  • Lampros Fotos

    (Terra Cert SA, Alexandras Avenue, 15343 Athens, Greece)

  • Elisavet Giamouri

    (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Vasileios G. Papatsiros

    (Clinic of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Trikalon 224, 43100 Karditsa, Greece)

Abstract

This study aimed to review recent developments in the agri-food industry, focusing on the integration of innovative digital systems into the livestock industry. Over the last 50 years, the production of animal-based foods has increased significantly due to the rising demand for meat. As a result, farms have increased their livestock numbers to meet consumer demand, which has exacerbated challenges related to environmental sustainability, human health, and animal welfare. In response to these challenges, precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies have emerged as a promising solution for sustainable livestock production. PLF technologies offer farmers the opportunity to increase efficiency while mitigating environmental impact, securing livelihoods, and promoting animal health and welfare. However, the adoption of PLF technologies poses several challenges for farmers and raises animal welfare concerns. Additionally, the existing legal framework for the use of PLF technologies is discussed. In summary, further research is needed to advance the scientific understanding of PLF technologies, and stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, and funders, need to prioritize ethical considerations related to their implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios I. Papakonstantinou & Nikolaos Voulgarakis & Georgia Terzidou & Lampros Fotos & Elisavet Giamouri & Vasileios G. Papatsiros, 2024. "Precision Livestock Farming Technology: Applications and Challenges of Animal Welfare and Climate Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:620-:d:1376731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/4/620/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/4/620/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie-Agnes Jouanjean & Francesca Casalini & Leanne Wiseman & Emily Gray, 2020. "Issues around data governance in the digital transformation of agriculture: The farmers’ perspective," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 146, OECD Publishing.
    2. Knight, Brad & Malcolm, Bill, 2009. "A whole-farm investment analysis of some precision agriculture technologies," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Francesco Forastiere, 2010. "Climate change and health: a challenge for epidemiology and public health," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(2), pages 83-84, April.
    4. Declan Kuch & M. Kearnes & K. Gulson, 2020. "The promise of precision: datafication in medicine, agriculture and education," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 527-546, September.
    5. Keren Dopelt & Pnina Radon & Nadav Davidovitch, 2019. "Environmental Effects of the Livestock Industry: The Relationship between Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior among Students in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hidalgo, Francisco & Quiñones-Ruiz, Xiomara F. & Birkenberg, Athena & Daum, Thomas & Bosch, Christine & Hirsch, Patrick & Birner, Regina, 2023. "Digitalization, sustainability, and coffee. Opportunities and challenges for agricultural development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Ghasem Toloo & Gerard FitzGerald & Peter Aitken & Kenneth Verrall & Shilu Tong, 2013. "Evaluating the effectiveness of heat warning systems: systematic review of epidemiological evidence," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(5), pages 667-681, October.
    3. Lisa Baldi & Filippo Arfini & Sara Calzolai & Michele Donati, 2023. "An Impact Assessment of GHG Taxation on Emilia-Romagna Dairy Farms through an Agent-Based Model Based on PMP," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Sukoluhle Mazwane & Moraka N. Makhura & Mmapatla P. Senyolo, 2022. "Important Policy Parameters for the Development of Inclusive Digital Agriculture: Implications for the Redistributive Land Reform Program in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Soowoong Hwang & Jiho Lee & Dojin Jang, 2024. "Climate Change Awareness and Pro-Environmental Intentions in Sports Fans: Applying the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model for Sustainable Spectating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Keren Dopelt & Liza Aharon & Miri Rimon, 2024. "Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Regarding Health and Environment in an Israeli Community: Implications for Sustainable Urban Environments and Public Health," World, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Eun-Hi Choi & Hyunjin Lee & Mi-Jung Kang & Inwoo Nam & Hui-Kyeong Moon & Ji-Won Sung & Jae-Yun Eu & Hae-Bin Lee, 2022. "Factors Affecting Zero-Waste Behaviours of College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Klingenberg, Cristina Orsolin & Valle Antunes Júnior, José Antônio & Müller-Seitz, Gordon, 2022. "Impacts of digitalization on value creation and capture: Evidence from the agricultural value chain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    9. Kaila-Lea Clarke & Peter Berry, 2012. "From theory to practice: a Canadian case study of the utility of climate change adaptation frameworks to address health impacts," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(1), pages 167-174, February.
    10. Jonathan R. McFadden & Alicia Rosburg & Eric Njuki, 2022. "Information inputs and technical efficiency in midwest corn production: evidence from farmers' use of yield and soil maps," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 589-612, March.
    11. Hualiang Lin & Liuqing Yang & Qiyong Liu & Tong Wang & Sarah Hossain & Suzanne Ho & Linwei Tian, 2012. "Time series analysis of Japanese encephalitis and weather in Linyi City, China," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(2), pages 289-296, April.
    12. Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich & Finger, Robert & El Benni, Nadja & Gocht, Alexander & Sørensen, Claus Aage Grøn & Gusset, Markus & Pfeifer, Catherine & Poppe, Krijn & Regan, Áine & Rose, David Christian & Wolf, 2022. "Scenarios for European agricultural policymaking in the era of digitalisation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:620-:d:1376731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.