IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i3p347-d1343421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Optimal Model to Improve Genomic Prediction for Protein Content and Test Weight in a Diverse Spring Wheat Panel

Author

Listed:
  • Pabitra Joshi

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen R & E Center, Aberdeen, ID 83210, USA)

  • Guriqbal Singh Dhillon

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen R & E Center, Aberdeen, ID 83210, USA)

  • Yaotian Gao

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen R & E Center, Aberdeen, ID 83210, USA)

  • Amandeep Kaur

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen R & E Center, Aberdeen, ID 83210, USA)

  • Justin Wheeler

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen R & E Center, Aberdeen, ID 83210, USA)

  • Jianli Chen

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen R & E Center, Aberdeen, ID 83210, USA)

Abstract

In recent years, genomic selection has been widely used in plant breeding to increase genetic gain. Selections are based on breeding values of each genotype estimated using genome-wide markers. The present study developed genomic prediction models for grain protein content (GPC) and test weight (TW) in a diverse panel of 170 spring wheat lines phenotyped in five environments. Five prediction models (GBLUP, RRBLUP, EGBLUP, RF, RKHS) were investigated. The population was genotyped for genome-wide markers with the Infinium iSelect 90 K SNP assay. Environmental variation was adjusted by calculating BLUPs across environments using the complete random effect GxE model. Both GPC and TW showed high heritability of 0.867 and 0.854, respectively. When using the five-fold cross-validation scheme in the five statistical models, we found that the EGBLUP model had the highest mean prediction accuracy (0.743) for GPC, while the RRBLUP model showed the highest mean prediction accuracy (0.650) for TW. Testing various proportions of the training population indicated that a minimum of 100 genotypes were required to train the model for optimum accuracy. Testing the prediction across environments showed that BLUPs outperformed 80% of the tested environments, even though at least one of the environments had higher prediction accuracies for each trait. Thus, the optimized GS model for GPC and TW has the potential to predict trait values accurately. Implementing GS would aid breeding through accurate early generation selection of superior lines, leading to higher genetic gain per breeding cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Pabitra Joshi & Guriqbal Singh Dhillon & Yaotian Gao & Amandeep Kaur & Justin Wheeler & Jianli Chen, 2024. "An Optimal Model to Improve Genomic Prediction for Protein Content and Test Weight in a Diverse Spring Wheat Panel," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:347-:d:1343421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lê, Sébastien & Josse, Julie & Husson, François, 2008. "FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 25(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surun, Clément & Drechsler, Martin, 2018. "Effectiveness of Tradable Permits for the Conservation of Metacommunities With Two Competing Species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 189-196.
    2. Alexander Platzer & Thomas Nussbaumer & Thomas Karonitsch & Josef S Smolen & Daniel Aletaha, 2019. "Analysis of gene expression in rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions offers insights into sex-bias, gene biotypes and co-expression patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Baccar, Mariem & Raynal, Hélène & Sekhar, Muddu & Bergez, Jacques-Eric & Willaume, Magali & Casel, Pierre & Giriraj, P. & Murthy, Sanjeeva & Ruiz, Laurent, 2023. "Dynamics of crop category choices reveal strategies and tactics used by smallholder farmers in India to cope with unreliable water availability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Aditi Sahu & Kivanc Kose & Lukas Kraehenbuehl & Candice Byers & Aliya Holland & Teguru Tembo & Anthony Santella & Anabel Alfonso & Madison Li & Miguel Cordova & Melissa Gill & Christi Fox & Salvador G, 2022. "In vivo tumor immune microenvironment phenotypes correlate with inflammation and vasculature to predict immunotherapy response," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Roopam Shukla & Ankit Agarwal & Kamna Sachdeva & Juergen Kurths & P. K. Joshi, 2019. "Climate change perception: an analysis of climate change and risk perceptions among farmer types of Indian Western Himalayas," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 103-119, January.
    6. Cholez, Celia & Pauly, Olivier & Mahdad, Maral & Mehrabi, Sepide & Giagnocavo, Cynthia & Bijman, Jos, 2023. "Heterogeneity of inter-organizational collaborations in agrifood chain sustainability-oriented innovations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Munten, Pauline & Swaen, Valérie & Vanhamme, Joëlle, 2024. "Exploring rebound effects in Access-Based services (ABS)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Florence Jacquet & A Aboul-Naga & Bernard Hubert, 2020. "The contribution of ARIMNet to address livestock systems resilience in the Mediterranean region," Post-Print hal-03625860, HAL.
    9. Marika Vitali & Paolo Bosi & Elena Santacroce & Paolo Trevisi, 2021. "The multivariate approach identifies relationships between pre-slaughter factors, body lesions, ham defects and carcass traits in pigs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Silvana Nisgoski & Joielan Xipaia dos Santos & Helena Cristina Vieira & Tawani Lorena Naide & Rafaela Stange & Washington Duarte Silva da Silva & Deivison Venicio Souza & Natally Celestino Gama & Márc, 2023. "Provenance Identification of Leaves and Nuts of Bertholletia excelsa Bonpl by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Color Parameters for Sustainable Extraction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Miranda D Stobbe & Gian A Thun & Andrea Diéguez-Docampo & Meritxell Oliva & Justin P Whalley & Emanuele Raineri & Ivo G Gut, 2019. "Recurrent somatic mutations reveal new insights into consequences of mutagenic processes in cancer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Alessandro Bonadonna & Stefano Duglio & Luigi Bollani & Giovanni Peira, 2022. "Mountain Food Products: A Cluster Analysis Based on Young Consumers’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Cyrille Bassolo Baki & Joost Wellens & Farid Traoré & Sié Palé & Bakary Djaby & Apolline Bambara & Nguyen T. T. Thao & Missa Hié & Bernard Tychon, 2022. "Assessment of Hydro-Agricultural Infrastructures in Burkina Faso by Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Gennifer Meldrum & Dunja Mijatović & Wilfredo Rojas & Juana Flores & Milton Pinto & Grover Mamani & Eleuterio Condori & David Hilaquita & Helga Gruberg & Stefano Padulosi, 2018. "Climate change and crop diversity: farmers’ perceptions and adaptation on the Bolivian Altiplano," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 703-730, April.
    15. Claire H Luby & Julie C Dawson & Irwin L Goldman, 2016. "Assessment and Accessibility of Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity of Carrot (Daucus carota L. var. sativus) Cultivars Commercially Available in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Hugo R Oliveira & Diana Tomás & Manuela Silva & Susana Lopes & Wanda Viegas & Maria Manuela Veloso, 2016. "Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in Vicia faba L. Landraces and Wild Related Species Assessed by Nuclear SSRs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Bottaro, Giorgia & Liagre, Ludwig & Pettenella, Davide, 2024. "The Forest Sector in EU Member States' National Recovery and Resilience Plans: a preliminary analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Julio E Peironcely & Theo Reijmers & Leon Coulier & Andreas Bender & Thomas Hankemeier, 2011. "Understanding and Classifying Metabolite Space and Metabolite-Likeness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Elio Romano & Rocco Roma & Flavio Tidona & Giorgio Giraffa & Andrea Bragaglio, 2021. "Dairy Farms and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): The Allocation Criterion Useful to Estimate Undesirable Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Margot Galière & Marisa Peyre & Facundo Muñoz & Mariline Poupaud & Alain Dehove & François Roger & Isabelle Dieuzy-Labaye, 2019. "Typological analysis of public-private partnerships in the veterinary domain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:347-:d:1343421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.