IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i11p2091-d1524740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Influence of Organic Loading Rate, Temperature and Stirring Speed on Biogas Production Using Agricultural Waste in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ephodia Sihlangu

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0183, South Africa)

  • Primrose Magama

    (Agricultural Research Council-Natural Resources & Engineering, Pretoria 0184, South Africa)

  • Idan Chiyanzu

    (Agricultural Research Council-Natural Resources & Engineering, Pretoria 0184, South Africa)

  • Thierry Regnier

    (Biotechnology & Food Technology, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0183, South Africa)

  • Dibungi Luseba

    (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa P.O. Box 11850, Democratic Republic of the Congo)

  • Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0183, South Africa)

Abstract

Biogas production offers an alternate method for managing agricultural waste and contributes to sustainable renewable energy generation. Anaerobic digestion (AD) enables the transformation of organic waste, including agricultural substrates, into biogas, mostly consisting of methane, carbon dioxide, and trace gases such as ammonia and hydrogen sulphide. The objective of this study was to employ a 30 L semi-continuous stirred tank reactor to evaluate the effects of organic loading rate, temperature, and speed of stirring on biogas production. The reactor was inoculated with 8.6 L and filled with 11.4 L of a mixed substrate including cattle manure, potato waste, potato starch waste, fruit waste, and expired dry dog food. The reactor was evaluated with organic loading rates (OLRs) of 11.2, 12.2, and 13.2 g VS/L d, and stirring speeds of 25.5, 35.5, and 45.5 rpm. The results indicated that the maximum yield was 12.2 g VS/L d at 45.5 rpm, and in thermophilic conditions, the biogas yield surpassed that of mesophilic conditions, measuring 105,860 NmL/g VS compared to 69,800 NmL/g VS. This study emphasises the significance of optimising operational parameters to improve biogas output, thereby contributing to sustainable energy resources and advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Suggested Citation

  • Ephodia Sihlangu & Primrose Magama & Idan Chiyanzu & Thierry Regnier & Dibungi Luseba & Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe, 2024. "Investigating the Influence of Organic Loading Rate, Temperature and Stirring Speed on Biogas Production Using Agricultural Waste in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:2091-:d:1524740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/11/2091/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/11/2091/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Schmid & Thomas Horschig & Alexandra Pfeiffer & Nora Szarka & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Biogas Upgrading: A Review of National Biomethane Strategies and Support Policies in Selected Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Full & Mathias Trauner & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2021. "Carbon-Negative Hydrogen Production (HyBECCS) from Organic Waste Materials in Germany: How to Estimate Bioenergy and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Alberto Benato & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alarico Macor, 2022. "Possible Ways of Extending the Biogas Plants Lifespan after the Feed-In Tariff Expiration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Guerin, Turlough F., 2022. "Business model scaling can be used to activate and grow the biogas-to-grid market in Australia to decarbonise hard-to-abate industries: An application of entrepreneurial management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Chipo Shonhiwa & Yolanda Mapantsela & Golden Makaka & Patrick Mukumba & Ngwarai Shambira, 2023. "Biogas Valorisation to Biomethane for Commercialisation in South Africa: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Krzysztof Michalski & Magdalena Kośka-Wolny & Krzysztof Chmielowski & Dawid Bedla & Agnieszka Petryk & Paweł Guzdek & Katarzyna Anna Dąbek & Michał Gąsiorek & Klaudiusz Grübel & Wiktor Halecki, 2024. "Examining the Potential of Biogas: A Pathway from Post-Fermented Waste into Energy in a Wastewater Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Qiang Wang & Thomas Dogot & Guosheng Wu & Xianlei Huang & Changbin Yin, 2019. "Residents’ Willingness for Centralized Biogas Production in Hebei and Shandong Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Agnieszka Urbanowska & Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz & Christian Aragon-Briceño & Mateusz Wnukowski & Artur Pożarlik & Lukasz Niedzwiecki & Marcin Baranowski & Michał Czerep & Przemysław Seruga & Hali, 2021. "Cascade Membrane System for Separation of Water and Organics from Liquid By-Products of HTC of the Agricultural Digestate—Evaluation of Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Sören Mohrmann & Verena Otter, 2022. "Categorisation of Biogas Plant Operators in Germany with Regards to Their Intention to Use Straw Pellets as Innovative and Sustainable Substrate Alternative," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Frank K. Radosits & Amela Ajanovic & Michael Harasek, 2024. "The relevance of biomass‐based gases as energy carriers: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), July.
    11. Jensen, M.B. & Ottosen, L.D.M. & Kofoed, M.V.W., 2021. "H2 gas-liquid mass transfer: A key element in biological Power-to-Gas methanation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    12. Roberto Murano & Natascia Maisano & Roberta Selvaggi & Gioacchino Pappalardo & Biagio Pecorino, 2021. "Critical Issues and Opportunities for Producing Biomethane in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Atreyi Pramanik & Anis Ahmad Chaudhary & Aashna Sinha & Kundan Kumar Chaubey & Mohammad Saquib Ashraf & Nosiba Suliman Basher & Hassan Ahmad Rudayni & Deen Dayal & Sanjay Kumar, 2023. "Nanocatalyst-Based Biofuel Generation: An Update, Challenges and Future Possibilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Spyridon Achinas & Demi Martherus & Janneke Krooneman & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "Preliminary Assessment of a Biogas-Based Power Plant from Organic Waste in the North Netherlands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Stephanie Taboada & Lori Clark & Jake Lindberg & David J. Tonjes & Devinder Mahajan, 2021. "Quantifying the Potential of Renewable Natural Gas to Support a Reformed Energy Landscape: Estimates for New York State," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Muhamed Rasit Atelge & Halil Senol & Mohammed Djaafri & Tulin Avci Hansu & David Krisa & Abdulaziz Atabani & Cigdem Eskicioglu & Hamdi Muratçobanoğlu & Sebahattin Unalan & Slimane Kalloum & Nuri Azbar, 2021. "A Critical Overview of the State-of-the-Art Methods for Biogas Purification and Utilization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-39, October.
    17. Alarico Macor & Alberto Benato, 2020. "Regulated Emissions of Biogas Engines—On Site Experimental Measurements and Damage Assessment on Human Health," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-38, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:2091-:d:1524740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.