IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i10p1804-d1497979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Relationship between Agricultural AI Adoption and Government-Subsidized Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Chad Patrick Osorio

    (Law Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
    Environmental Economics and Natural Resources (ENR) Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
    School of Environmental Science and Management, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños 4031, Philippines)

  • Francesca Leucci

    (Law Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Donatella Porrini

    (Department of Cultural Heritage, Università del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
    National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

Due to the increased unpredictability and severity of weather patterns caused by climate change, traditional farming practices and risk management strategies are becoming increasingly inadequate. In this paper, we explore the literature to understand the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in mitigating climate-related agricultural risks and the pivotal role that public institutions play in encouraging farmers to adopt such technologies. We propose a framework to integrate AI into government-subsidized insurance structures, focusing on reduced premiums through government intervention. We argue that AI’s potential to reduce the uncertainty and severity of climate-induced damages could lower the overall risk profile of insured farmers, thereby justifying lower premiums in the long run. We further discuss the implications of such policies on insurance markets, agricultural sustainability, and global food security. Our initial exploration contributes to the literature by addressing a relatively underexplored intersection of two critical fields—agricultural insurance and artificial intelligence—suggesting directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad Patrick Osorio & Francesca Leucci & Donatella Porrini, 2024. "Analyzing the Relationship between Agricultural AI Adoption and Government-Subsidized Insurance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1804-:d:1497979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1804/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1804/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carter, Michael R. & Cheng, Lan & Sarris, Alexandros, 2016. "Where and how index insurance can boost the adoption of improved agricultural technologies," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 59-71.
    2. Keith H Coble & Ashok K Mishra & Shannon Ferrell & Terry Griffin, 2018. "Big Data in Agriculture: A Challenge for the Future," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 79-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilson, Nicholas, 2021. "Why is ageing associated with lower adoption of new technologies? Evidence from voluntary medical male circumcision and a structural model," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    2. He, Juan & Zheng, Xiaoyong, 2017. "Does Crop Insurance Really Reassure Farmers? A Puzzle and its Explanations Based on Field Data," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258398, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Jorge L. García-Alcaraz & Aidé A. Maldonado-Macías & Juan L. Hernández-Arellano & Julio Blanco-Fernández & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Juan C. Sáenz-Díez Muro, 2016. "Agricultural Tractor Selection: A Hybrid and Multi-Attribute Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Alice Bonou & Markus Olapade & Alessandra Garbero & Leonard Wantchekon, 2023. "Evaluation of the Effects of Introducing Risk Management Tools in Agricultural Development: The Case of PADAER Senegal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Williams Ali & Awudu Abdulai & Renan Goetz & Victor Owusu, 2021. "Risk, ambiguity and willingness to participate in crop insurance programs: Evidence from a field experiment," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(3), pages 679-703, July.
    6. Rabhi, Loubna & Jabir, Brahim & Falih, Noureddine & Afraites, Lekbir & Bouikhalene, Belaid, 2023. "A Connected farm Metamodeling Using Advanced Information Technologies for an Agriculture 4.0," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(2), June.
    7. Apurba Shee & Calum G. Turvey & Ana Marr, 2021. "Heterogeneous Demand and Supply for an Insurance‐linked Credit Product in Kenya: A Stated Choice Experiment Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 244-267, February.
    8. Shukkri AHMED & Craig MCINTOSH & Alexandros SARRIS, 2017. "The Impact of Commercial Rainfall Index Insurance: Experimental Evidence from Ethiopia," Working Papers 4289, FERDI.
    9. Mao, Hui & Chen, Shaojian & Ying, RuiYao & Fu, Yong, 2023. "How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: Evidence from cotton farmers in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(02), January.
    10. Benjamin L. Collier, 2020. "Strengthening Local Credit Markets Through Lender‐Level Index Insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 87(2), pages 319-349, June.
    11. Anita Mukherjee & Shawn Cole & Jeremy Tobacman, 2021. "Targeting weather insurance markets," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(3), pages 757-784, September.
    12. Juan He & Roderick Rejesus & Xiaoyong Zheng & Jose Yorobe, 2018. "Advantageous Selection in Crop Insurance: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 646-668, September.
    13. Jiangqi Sun & Jiahao Zhan & Zhaojiu Chen, 2024. "Agricultural Insurance and Selection of Soil Testing and Formula Fertilization Technology—An Empirical Study Based on the Main Rice-Producing Areas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Amanda M. Nelson & Nicolas E. Quintana Ashwell & Christopher D. Delhom & Drew M. Gholson, 2022. "Leveraging Big Data to Preserve the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer: A Blueprint for the National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Kumar, Parveen & Hendriks, Tim & Panoutsopoulos, Hercules & Brewster, Christopher, 2024. "Investigating FAIR data principles compliance in horizon 2020 funded Agri-food and rural development multi-actor projects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    16. Barituka Bekee & Michelle S. Segovia & Corinne Valdivia, 2024. "Adoption of smart farm networks: a translational process to inform digital agricultural technologies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1573-1590, December.
    17. Hill, Ruth Vargas & Kumar, Neha & Magnan, Nicholas & Makhija, Simrin & de Nicola, Francesca & Spielman, David J. & Ward, Patrick S., 2019. "Ex ante and ex post effects of hybrid index insurance in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-17.
    18. Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele & Bardají, Isabel & Garrido, Alberto & Berry, Robert & Bijttebier, Jo & Gavrilescu, Camelia & Harizanova, Hristina & Jendrzejewski, Błażej & Meuwissen, Miranda M.P. & Ollen, 2021. "Stakeholder perspectives to improve risk management in European farming systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 84, pages 147-161.
    19. Naranjo, María A. & Pieters, Janneke & Alpízar, Francisco, 2019. "Credit, insurance and farmers’ liability: Evidence from a lab in the field experiment with coffee farmers in Costa Rica," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 12-27.
    20. Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Agnieszka Strzelecka & Danuta Zawadzka, 2021. "The Impact of Crop Diversification on the Economic Efficiency of Small Farms in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1804-:d:1497979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.