IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i7p1359-d1188190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Insight into the Global Problem of Gastrointestinal Helminth Infections amongst Livestock: Does Nanotechnology Provide an Alternative?

Author

Listed:
  • Laraibah Hamid

    (Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar 190006, J&K, India
    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar 190006, J&K, India)

  • Abdulrhman Alsayari

    (Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hidayatullah Tak

    (Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar 190006, J&K, India)

  • Suhail Ahmad Mir

    (Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar 190006, J&K, India)

  • Mohammad Ali Abdullah Almoyad

    (Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences in Khamis Mushyt, King Khalid University, Mushait, P.O. Box 4536, Abha 61412, Saudi Arabia)

  • Shadma Wahab

    (Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ghulam Nabi Bader

    (Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar 190006, J&K, India)

Abstract

Helminth parasitic infections are a considerable constraint to the livestock industries worldwide. Nematode parasites cause the major proportion of harm to livestock. The infections caused are accountable for severe economic losses in cattle, goat and sheep farming industries. Morbidity and mortality in livestock due to parasitic diseases are increasing alarmingly. Also, their zoonotic influence on human health is considered significant. Anthelmintic drugs have been developed occasionally to curb this disease and prevent major losses. But the development of resistance against these drugs has put another constraint on this flourishing industry. Helminth parasites have developed resistance against three main classes of anthelmintics: benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones and nicotinic agonists. With the intensification of resistance, various screening and confirmatory tests have been developed for the speedy introduction of newer drugs in the livestock industry. At the same time, designing and launching novel anthelmintics is time-consuming and economically restrained. Phytochemicals attract much attention because of their pharmacotherapeutic potential, least toxic profile and low environmental hazards. A lot of work is going on plant-based anthelmintic drugs throughout the world. Plants possessing anthelmintic activity have been found efficacious against gastrointestinal parasites. Nevertheless, these herbal medicines have various drawbacks, which include poor efficacy and the absence of target selectivity. These problems are now being taken care of with the help of nanotechnology. Nanoparticles improve the drug’s effectiveness, enhance drug delivery, and target selectivity at specific sites. A comprehensive literature survey was carried out via electronic searches of Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, Science Direct, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria; articles were selected for this review. The review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of plant-based nanoparticles as therapeutic alternatives over conventional synthetic anthelmintic drugs. It also encompasses the methods of detection of resistance and the ways to overcome this menace. The effectiveness of various organic and inorganic nanoparticles against helminthes is also discussed in this review.

Suggested Citation

  • Laraibah Hamid & Abdulrhman Alsayari & Hidayatullah Tak & Suhail Ahmad Mir & Mohammad Ali Abdullah Almoyad & Shadma Wahab & Ghulam Nabi Bader, 2023. "An Insight into the Global Problem of Gastrointestinal Helminth Infections amongst Livestock: Does Nanotechnology Provide an Alternative?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1359-:d:1188190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Anjani & Singh, Dhiraj K., 2008. "Livestock Production Systems in India: An Appraisal Across Agro-Ecological Regions," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1-21.
    2. Chamberlin, Jordan & Jayne, T.S., 2020. "Does farm structure affect rural household incomes? Evidence from Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda & Nuhu, Ahmed Salim & Awokuse, Titus O. & Jayne, Thomas S. & Muyanga, Milu & Aromolaran, Adebayo & Adelaja, Adesoji, 2020. "Spillover effects of Medium-Scale Farms on Smallholder Behavior and Welfare: Evidence from Nigeria," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304606, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Sanzidur Rahman, 2018. "Agroecological, Land-Elevation and Socioeconomic Determinants of Raising Livestock in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Yemane Asmelash Gebremariam & Joost Dessein & Beneberu Assefa Wondimagegnhu & Mark Breusers & Lutgart Lenaerts & Enyew Adgo & Zemen Ayalew & Amare Sewenet Minale & Jan Nyssen, 2021. "Determinants of Farmers’ Level of Interaction with Agricultural Extension Agencies in Northwest Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Sant'Anna, Ana Claudia & Katchova, Ani L., 2022. "How Economic Conditions Changed the Number of U.S. Farms, 1960-88: A Replication and Extension of Gale (1990) to Midsize Farms in the U.S. and Abroad," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321202, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    5. Ayala Wineman & Thomas S. Jayne & Emma Isinika Modamba & Holger Kray, 2021. "Characteristics and Spillover Effects of Medium-Scale Farms in Tanzania," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(6), pages 1877-1898, December.
    6. Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul Jr. & Ordway, Elsa M. & Nkongho, Raymond N. & Molua, Ernest L., 2022. "Oil palm expansion among non-industrial producers in Cameroon: Potentials for synergy between agro-economic gains and ecological safeguards," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool‐Tasie & Ahmed Salim Nuhu & Titus Awokuse & Thomas Jayne & Milu Muyanga & Adebayo Aromolaran & Adesoji Adelaja, 2023. "Can medium‐scale farms support smallholder commercialisation and improve welfare? Evidence from Nigeria," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 48-74, February.
    8. Abhishek Rajan & Tushaar Shah, 2020. "Impact of Irrigation on India’s Dairy Economy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Baba, S.H. & Wani, M.H. & Zargar, B.A. & Malik, H.A., 2014. "Imperatives for Sustenance of Agricultural Economy in the Mountains: A Prototype from Jammu & Kashmir," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 27(2).
    10. Ana Claudia Sant'Anna & Ani L. Katchova, 2023. "How economic conditions changed the number of U.S. Farms, 1960–1988: A replication and extension of Gale (1990) to midsize farms in the United States and abroad," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1400-1426, September.
    11. Anupam Sarkar, 2020. "Agricultural Mechanization in India: A Study on the Ownership and Investment in Farm Machinery by Cultivator Households across Agro-ecological Regions," Millennial Asia, , vol. 11(2), pages 160-186, August.
    12. Saba, Saidatus & Sarker, Md. Abdur Rashid & Gow, Jeff, 2022. "Determinants of non-farm income diversification strategies and decisions of Bangladesh farm households," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 226-235.
    13. Anupam Sarkar, 2020. "Role of Livestock Farming in Meeting Livelihood Challenges of SC Cultivators in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 14(1), pages 23-41, April.
    14. Francis Mensah & Guoqing Shi & Qingnian Yu & Emmanuel Bosompem Boadi & Francis Akorful Andam & Nicholas Anarfi Bofah, 2022. "The Impact of Resettlement in Urban Market Redevelopment on Income Inequality, Its Determinants, and Implications for the Resettled Population: Applying the Kejetia New Market Exemplar, Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Fu, Changluan & Sun, Xinyue & Guo, Mengting & Yu, Chenyang, 2024. "Can digital inclusive finance facilitate productive investment in rural households?–An empirical study based on the China Household Finance Survey," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Rajan, Abhishek & Shah, Tushaar, "undated". "Impact of irrigation on India’s dairy economy," Papers published in Journals (Open Access) H049547, International Water Management Institute.
    17. Singh, Shiv Raj & Datta, K.K., 2013. "Future of Smallholders in the Indian Dairy Sector – Some Anecdotal Evidence," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(2), pages 1-13.
    18. Phuc Van Phan & Martin O'Brien, 2022. "Is small beautiful? An empirical analysis of land characteristics and rural household income in Vietnam," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(3), pages 561-580, July.
    19. Baba, S.H. & Wani, M.H. & Zargar, Bilal A., 2011. "Dynamics and Sustainability of Livestock Sector in Jammu & Kashmir," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 24(1), June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1359-:d:1188190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.