IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i6p1143-d1158436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nematicidal Effects of Four Terpenes Differ among Entomopathogenic Nematode Species

Author

Listed:
  • Vasileios Kotsinis

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Alexandros Dritsoulas

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Dionysios Ntinokas

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Ioannis O. Giannakou

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) have been studied for more than half a century, and employed for insect pest management using augmentation, conservation, and classical biological control approaches. As obligate lethal parasitoids of insect larvae, EPN navigate a chemically complex soil environment and interact with their insect hosts, plants, and each other. EPN responses to various terpenes, such as herbivore-induced plant volatiles, have the potential to enhance EPN efficacy through their attraction. However, several of the terpenes are currently being formulated as biological fungicides, insecticides, and acaricides for above- or below-ground applications. We conducted laboratory experiments to investigate the possible nematicidal effect of four terpenes, carvacrol, geraniol, eugenol, and thymol, to two heterorhabditids and two steinernematid species. Each terpene showed nematicidal activity against at least two of the four EPN species, with carvacrol showing the strongest activity and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora the highest sensitivity. Despite the high sensitivity of both heterorhabditids and near-zero sensitivity of the steinernematids to thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol, an increasing effect was observed when steinermatid nematodes were exposed to geraniol, and a decreasing effect for heterorhabditids, with H. bacteriophora exhibiting higher mortality than H. indica . The virulence of the nematodes towards fourth instar Galleria mellonella was also tested after exposure to the median lethal doses of each terpene. No significant difference in virulence was observed between nematodes that were exposed or not exposed to sublethal doses. The experiments suggest that the tested terpenes have a strong effect on EPN viability, which should be considered when combining the two approaches in IPM. The terpenes did not have a universal effect on all nematode species, which merits further investigation, while virulence tests suggest that sublethal doses of these terpenes have no effect on the host-killing performance of EPNs.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasileios Kotsinis & Alexandros Dritsoulas & Dionysios Ntinokas & Ioannis O. Giannakou, 2023. "Nematicidal Effects of Four Terpenes Differ among Entomopathogenic Nematode Species," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:6:p:1143-:d:1158436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/6/1143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/6/1143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergio Rasmann & Tobias G. Köllner & Jörg Degenhardt & Ivan Hiltpold & Stefan Toepfer & Ulrich Kuhlmann & Jonathan Gershenzon & Ted C. J. Turlings, 2005. "Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7034), pages 732-737, April.
    2. Mark L. Blaxter & Paul De Ley & James R. Garey & Leo X. Liu & Patsy Scheldeman & Andy Vierstraete & Jacques R. Vanfleteren & Laura Y. Mackey & Mark Dorris & Linda M. Frisse & J. T. Vida & W. Kelley Th, 1998. "A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda," Nature, Nature, vol. 392(6671), pages 71-75, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zimai Li & Bhoomika Bhat & Erik T. Frank & Thalita Oliveira-Honorato & Fumika Azuma & Valérie Bachmann & Darren J. Parker & Thomas Schmitt & Evan P. Economo & Yuko Ulrich, 2023. "Behavioural individuality determines infection risk in clonal ant colonies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Alexander Gaffke & Maritza Romero & Hans Alborn, 2023. "What Is More Important to Host-Seeking Entomopathogenic Nematodes, Innate or Learned Preference?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-9, September.
    3. Anamarija Jagodič & Stanislav Trdan & Žiga Laznik, 2019. "Entomopathogenic nematodes: can we use the current knowledge on belowground multitrophic interactions in future plant protection programmes? - Review," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 243-254.
    4. Aurélien Perrier & Nadège Guiglielmoni & Delphine Naquin & Kevin Gorrichon & Claude Thermes & Sonia Lameiras & Alexander Dammermann & Philipp H. Schiffer & Maia Brunstein & Julie C. Canman & Julien Du, 2024. "Maternal inheritance of functional centrioles in two parthenogenetic nematodes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Ryoji Shinya & Simo Sun & Mehmet Dayi & Isheng Jason Tsai & Atsushi Miyama & Anthony Fu Chen & Koichi Hasegawa & Igor Antoshechkin & Taisei Kikuchi & Paul W. Sternberg, 2022. "Possible stochastic sex determination in Bursaphelenchus nematodes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Dominique A Cowart & Miguel Pinheiro & Olivier Mouchel & Marion Maguer & Jacques Grall & Jacques Miné & Sophie Arnaud-Haond, 2015. "Metabarcoding Is Powerful yet Still Blind: A Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Molecular Surveys of Seagrass Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Maria E Gallegos & Sanjeev Balakrishnan & Priya Chandramouli & Shaily Arora & Aruna Azameera & Anitha Babushekar & Emilee Bargoma & Abdulmalik Bokhari & Siva Kumari Chava & Pranti Das & Meetali Desai , 2012. "The C. elegans Rab Family: Identification, Classification and Toolkit Construction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Dadong Dai & Chuanshuai Xie & Yayi Zhou & Dexin Bo & Shurong Zhang & Shengqiang Mao & Yucheng Liao & Simeng Cui & Zhaolu Zhu & Xueyu Wang & Fanling Li & Donghai Peng & Jinshui Zheng & Ming Sun, 2023. "Unzipped chromosome-level genomes reveal allopolyploid nematode origin pattern as unreduced gamete hybridization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Maxim V. Zagoskin & Jianbin Wang & Ashley T. Neff & Giovana M. B. Veronezi & Richard E. Davis, 2022. "Small RNA pathways in the nematode Ascaris in the absence of piRNAs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:6:p:1143-:d:1158436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.