IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1431-d911104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and Analysis of Contribution Rate for China Rice Input Factors via a Varying-Coefficient Production Function Model

Author

Listed:
  • Zehua Li

    (College of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Key Laboratory of Smart Agricultural Technology in Tropical South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P.R.China, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Xiaola Wu

    (School of Information Engineering, Zhujiang College, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510900, China)

  • Xicheng Wang

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Haimin Zhong

    (College of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Jiongtao Chen

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Xu Ma

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

To explore the internal driving force of the growth of rice yield per unit area in China, a model based on varying-coefficient production function is proposed in this study, which comes from the idea that the constant elasticity parameters in the Cobb-Douglas production function can be extended to functional forms. Applying such model to economic growth analysis, on the one hand, the dynamic contribution rate of each input factor can be measured, and, on the other hand, the contribution rate of the input factor can be decomposed into net factor contribution rate and interaction factor contribution rate, thus expanding the explanatory ability of growth rate equation. Using such model, the output elasticity of capital and labor in China’s rice yield growth are calculated from 1978 to 2020, and the dynamic characteristics of the contribution rate of capital, labor and generalized technological progress are analyzed. Next, the capital contribution rate is decomposed according to the composition of the total capital. The results show that: (1) The capital elasticity and labor elasticity are indeed not constant in different years. In China, from 1978 to 2020 the value of capital elasticity was between 0.3209 to 0.3589, with a mean of 0.3437, and the value of labor elasticity was between −0.1759 to −0.1640, with a mean of −0.1730. (2) Natural disasters do affect capital elasticity and labor elasticity in rice production. (3) When the annual proportion of crop disasters increases, the contribution rate of interaction between capital and natural disaster (KDR) value is negative, whereas the contribution rate of interaction between labor and natural disaster (LDR) value is positive. (4) Compared with 1978, the generalized technological progress contribution rate (GTPR) of the rice yield growth in China from 1979 to 2020 shows a declining trend in fluctuations, whereas the total capital contribution rate (TKR) shows a rising trend in fluctuations and the total labor contribution rate (TLR) is relatively stable in the same period. Since 2000, capital investment has become the main factor for the rice yield growth per unit area in China, of which machinery, chemical fertilizer, seed and pesticide are the four most important input factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Zehua Li & Xiaola Wu & Xicheng Wang & Haimin Zhong & Jiongtao Chen & Xu Ma, 2022. "Measurement and Analysis of Contribution Rate for China Rice Input Factors via a Varying-Coefficient Production Function Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1431-:d:911104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young K. Lee & Enno Mammen & Byeong U. Park, 2014. "Backfitting and smooth backfitting in varying coefficient quantile regression," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 17(2), pages 20-38, June.
    2. Elahi, Ehsan & Weijun, Cui & Zhang, Huiming & Nazeer, Majid, 2019. "Agricultural intensification and damages to human health in relation to agrochemicals: Application of artificial intelligence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 461-474.
    3. Joko Mariyono, 2018. "Decomposed total factor productivity of Indonesian rice production," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 10(2), pages 121-127.
    4. Chieko Umetsu & Thamana Lekprichakul & Ujjayant Chakravorty, 2003. "Efficiency and Technical Change in the Philippine Rice Sector: A Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 943-963.
    5. Guo-Liang Fan & Hong-Xia Xu, 2019. "Averaged and Integrated Estimations of Varying-Coefficient Regression Models with Dependent Observations," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-10, July.
    6. Nur Atikah Mohidem & Norhashila Hashim & Rosnah Shamsudin & Hasfalina Che Man, 2022. "Rice for Food Security: Revisiting Its Production, Diversity, Rice Milling Process and Nutrient Content," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Zhang, Riquan & Li, Guoying, 2007. "Averaged estimation of functional-coefficient regression models with different smoothing variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(4), pages 455-461, February.
    8. Joko Mariyono, 2018. "Decomposition total factor productivity of Indonesian rice production," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 10(2), pages 121-127, Oktober.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shixiong Song & Siyuan Zhao & Ye Zhang & Yongxi Ma, 2023. "Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Inputs in China over the Past Three Decades," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morice R. O. Odhiambo & Adnan Abbas & Xiaochan Wang & Ehsan Elahi, 2020. "Thermo-Environmental Assessment of a Heated Venlo-Type Greenhouse in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-34, December.
    2. Manogna R. L. & Aswini Kumar Mishra, 2022. "Agricultural production efficiency of Indian states: Evidence from data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4244-4255, October.
    3. Danilo Đokić & Bojan Matkovski & Marija Jeremić & Ivan Đurić, 2022. "Land Productivity and Agri-Environmental Indicators: A Case Study of Western Balkans," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Patricio Vladimir Méndez-Zambrano & Luis Patricio Tierra Pérez & Rogelio Estalin Ureta Valdez & Ángel Patricio Flores Orozco, 2023. "Technological Innovations for Agricultural Production from an Environmental Perspective: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Dan Pan & Jiaqing Yang & Guzhen Zhou & Fanbin Kong, 2020. "The influence of COVID-19 on agricultural economy and emergency mitigation measures in China: A text mining analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Mengna Li & Li Tan & Xi Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Cultivated Land Use Eco-Efficiency: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Min Zhu & Haiyun Tang & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Kaili Wang & Nimra Nisar, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Influencing Factors of Ecological Protection Levels in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Shengnan Huang & Ehsan Elahi, 2022. "Farmers’ Preferences for Recycling Pesticide Packaging Waste: An Implication of a Discrete Choice Experiment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Sellare, Jorge & Meemken, Eva-Marie & Qaim, Matin, 2020. "Fairtrade, Agrochemical Input Use, and Effects on Human Health and the Environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Kurup, Suresh & Jha, Girish & Singh, Alka, 2015. "Technical and efficiency changes in oilseed sector in India: Implications for policy," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212017, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Xiao Lu & Yi Qu & Piling Sun & Wei Yu & Wenlong Peng, 2020. "Green Transition of Cultivated Land Use in the Yellow River Basin: A Perspective of Green Utilization Efficiency Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Dakpo, K Hervé & Desjeux, Yann & Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Productivity, efficiency and technological change in French agriculture during 2002-2014: A Färe-Primont index decomposition," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 244793, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Kaili Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Yuge Zhang & Di Wang & Zainab Khalid, 2022. "A Development of Green Finance and Regional Eco-Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Frantisek Brazdik, 2006. "Non-Parametric Analysis of Technical Efficiency: Factors Affecting Efficiency of West Java Rice Farms," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp286, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    15. Suresh, A., 2013. "Technical Change and Efficiency of Rice Production in India: A Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Approach," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 26(Conferenc).
    16. Xiuli Cui & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Bo Xu, 2022. "Environmental Regulation, Manufacturing Technological Progress and Pollution Emissions: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    17. repec:hal:journl:hal-04487480 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Wei Sun & Junli Li & Wenxi Qu, 2022. "Sustainability evolution and factors based on ecological footprint: A case study of Rizhao, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 132-150, March.
    19. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Weijun, Cui & Zhang, Huiming, 2020. "The public policy of agricultural land allotment to agrarians and its impact on crop productivity in Punjab province of Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Adnan, Nadia & Nordin, Shahrina Md & Anwar, Abdullah, 2020. "Transition pathways for Malaysian paddy farmers to sustainable agricultural practices: An integrated exhibiting tactics to adopt Green fertilizer," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    21. Valerien O. Pede & Francisco J. Areal & Alphonse Singbo & Justin McKinley & Kei Kajisa, 2018. "Spatial dependency and technical efficiency: an application of a Bayesian stochastic frontier model to irrigated and rainfed rice farmers in Bohol, Philippines," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(3), pages 301-312, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1431-:d:911104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.