IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i7p1018-d862202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CARVER+Shock and Business Process Management in Improving Food Safety of Primary Production

Author

Listed:
  • Aneta Wysokińska-Senkus

    (Institute of Management, Management and Command Faculty, War Studies University, Al. gen. Antoniego Chruściela “Montera” 103, 00-910 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Justyna Górna

    (Institute of Management, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznan, Poland)

  • Magdalena Kaźmierczak

    (Institute of Management, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznan, Poland)

  • Paweł Mielcarek

    (Institute of Management, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznan, Poland)

  • Piotr Senkus

    (Institute of Management, Management and Command Faculty, War Studies University, Al. gen. Antoniego Chruściela “Montera” 103, 00-910 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Context: Food safety is essential for every human. It determines public health, nutrition, elimination of hunger, and the promotion of sustainable agriculture. It is crucial for sustainable production, consumption, and international food trade. Ensuring food safety is the fundamental challenge of the 21st century. Food safety is often related to food defense and includes protection against intentional contamination with various chemical, biological, or other harmful substances. By introducing food protection tools and methods, any company reduces risk and creates an opportunity to generate more significant and reliable profits and improved production for society. One such method could be the CARVER+Shock. The method is an offensive targeting prioritization tool that has been adapted for use in the food sector. Objective: The article aims to present the experience of the first implementation of CARVER+Shock in a Polish primary production company, to improve the approach to food safety and food defense. Methods: The article is a case study. Descriptive analysis was performed to analyze legal acts and safety management standards in food defense. The authors used the CARVER+Shock expert method to estimate companies’ vulnerability. CARVER is an acronym for Criticality, Accessibility, Recoverability, Vulnerability, Effect, Recognizability. The visualization and risk analysis were made using business process management and business process modeling (VACD diagram) Results and conclusions: Primary production enterprise dealing with the cultivation and confectioning of the pre-treatment and sale of peeled onions for further processing purposes was examined. Five essential stages of the production process were assessed, and risks were assigned. Recognizability and criticality turned out to be the most crucial attribute of CARVER+Shock. Overall, the study showed that the company was not fully prepared for the threat posed by food terrorism. The organization did not have any procedures describing how to proceed during deliberate attacks. In addition, workers had low awareness of food defense throughout the food chain. Based on these conclusions, several detailed improvement actions were formulated. The results obtained from the pioneering application of the CARVER+Shock method for a Polish primary production company may constitute a benchmark for other sectors of the food industry, both domestically and abroad. Significance: The article describes the results of the first Polish attempts to use CARVER+Shock and business process management to improve the approach to food safety in a primary production enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneta Wysokińska-Senkus & Justyna Górna & Magdalena Kaźmierczak & Paweł Mielcarek & Piotr Senkus, 2022. "CARVER+Shock and Business Process Management in Improving Food Safety of Primary Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1018-:d:862202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1018/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1018/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katja Pietrzyck & Sebastian Jarzębowski & Brigitte Petersen, 2021. "Exploring Sustainable Aspects Regarding the Food Supply Chain, Agri-Food Quality Standards, and Global Trade: An Empirical Study among Experts from the European Union and the United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Michael Hammer, 2010. "What is Business Process Management?," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pages 3-16, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Beverungen, 2014. "Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(4), pages 191-202, August.
    2. Hans Buhl & Maximilian Röglinger & Stefan Stöckl & Kathrin Braunwarth, 2011. "Value Orientation in Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(3), pages 163-172, June.
    3. Ralf Plattfaut, 2022. "On the Importance of Project Management Capabilities for Sustainable Business Process Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Olshanskiy Oleksandr, 2018. "Development of methods of improvement of business process management," Technology audit and production reserves, 5(43) 2018, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 5(4(43)), pages 20-25.
    5. Brinch, Morten & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2021. "Firm-level capabilities towards big data value creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 539-548.
    6. Ma³gorzata Okrêglicka & Monika Mynarzova & Radomir Kana, 2015. "Business Process Maturity In Small And Mediumsized Enterprises," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(1), pages 121-131, DEcember.
    7. Iden, Jon & Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, 2013. "Implementing IT Service Management: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 512-523.
    8. Magdalena Raczyńska & Krzysztof Krukowski, 2019. "Organisational Culture as a Determinant of Business Process Management in the Community Offices in Poland," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Plattfaut, Ralf & Koch, Julian, 2021. "Preserving the legacy – Why do professional soccer clubs (not) adopt innovative process technologies? A grounded theory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 237-250.
    10. Sébastien Dony, 2017. "Ce que nous apprennent les démarches d'amélioration de l'efficience dans les collectivités territoriales," Post-Print hal-01907400, HAL.
    11. Rahimi, Fatemeh & Møller, Charles & Hvam, Lars, 2016. "Business process management and IT management: The missing integration," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 142-154.
    12. Peter Sarlin & Henrik J. Nyman, 2013. "The process of macroprudential oversight in Europe," Papers 1312.7545, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2014.
    13. Heitor Mansur Caulliraux & Thais Spiegel & Adriano Proen?a, 2012. "Process Management and Organizational Structure in Large Brazilian Companies: Multiple Case Study," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(2), pages 48-68, June.
    14. Peter Loos & Wolfgang Nebel & Jorge Marx Gómez & Helen Hasan & Richard Watson & Jan Brocke & Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker, 2011. "Green IT: A Matter of Business and Information Systems Engineering?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(4), pages 245-252, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1018-:d:862202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.