IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i2p288-d751672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pesticide Use Culture among Food Crop Farmers: Implications for Subtle Exposure and Management in Barbados

Author

Listed:
  • David Oscar Yawson

    (Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies (CERMES), Cave Hill Campus, The University of the West Indies, St. Michael, P.O. Box 64, Bridgetown BB11000, Barbados)

Abstract

Globally, there is a strong interest in on-farm pesticide use culture due to genuine concerns about the individual, public, and ecological health risks posed by pesticides. At farm scale, pesticide use culture can be captured via the assessments of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) to inform intervention strategy and integrated science-based management. Despite the intensive use of pesticides in agriculture in the Caribbean, there is limited information on pesticide use culture or KAP assessment. This study assessed the pesticide use culture among selected food crop farmers in Barbados. A cross-sectional study of 93 food crop farmers, using a semi-structured instrument, was carried out. The results show that the respondents self-rated their level of knowledge on pesticide handling and application as medium to high but low on waste management. Over 50% of the respondents indicated they determine application rates and could understand and follow information on pesticide labels. The majority of the respondents relied on the Internet for information on pesticides, and less than half had received formal training on pesticide use in the three years preceding this study. On attitude, there was overwhelming support for the encouragement of pesticide usage to reduce losses in yield and quality of harvest. Knowledge did not always imply positive attitudes toward safe practices. While 86% agreed that pesticides posed considerable risks to the personal health of users, 60% agreed that one did not need to have all the recommended personal protective equipment (PPE) before using a given pesticide. Due to gaps in the knowledge–attitude–practice continuum, some respondents applied pesticides when necessary, and there was low adherence to the use of recommended PPE when handling/applying pesticides or cleaning/repairing pesticide application equipment, and some respondents indicated a tendency to eat, drink, or smoke during or immediately after pesticide application. These suggest subtle exposure. It was concluded that the low use of recommended PPE, high reliance on the Internet for pesticide guidance, and, particularly, pesticide waste disposal practices require urgent attention from policy, regulatory, and practical levels to improve the pesticide use culture.

Suggested Citation

  • David Oscar Yawson, 2022. "Pesticide Use Culture among Food Crop Farmers: Implications for Subtle Exposure and Management in Barbados," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:288-:d:751672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/288/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/288/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brisbois, Ben W. & Spiegel, Jerry M. & Harris, Leila, 2019. "Health, environment and colonial legacies: Situating the science of pesticides, bananas and bodies in Ecuador," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Damian Tago & Henrik Andersson & Nicolas Treich, 2014. "Pesticides and Health: A Review of Evidence on Health Effects, Valuation of Risks, and Benefit-Cost Analysis," Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, in: Preference Measurement in Health, volume 24, pages 203-295, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Jianhua Wang & May Chu & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Measuring Rice Farmer’s Pesticide Overuse Practice and the Determinants: A Statistical Analysis Based on Data Collected in Jiangsu and Anhui Provinces of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Abebe, Asheber & Jolly, Curtis M. & Ngqabutho, Ncube & Jolly, Pauline E., 2011. "Pesticide Handling and Pesticide Container Disposal Measures in Northeastern Jamaica," 29th West Indies Agricultural Economics Conference, July 17-21, 2011, Saint Vincent, West Indies 187393, Caribbean Agro-Economic Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ionuț-Alexandru Spânu & Alexandru Ozunu & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2022. "A Comparative View of Agri-Environmental Indicators and Stakeholders’ Assessment of Their Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Zedekiah Odira Onyando & Elizabeth Omukunda & Patrick Okoth & Sandra Khatiebi & Solomon Omwoma & Peter Otieno & Odipo Osano & Joseph Lalah, 2023. "Screening and Prioritization of Pesticide Application for Potential Human Health and Environmental Risks in Largescale Farms in Western Kenya," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Xiuling Ding & Apurbo Sarkar & Lipeng Li & Hua Li & Qian Lu, 2022. "Effects of Market Incentives and Livelihood Dependence on Farmers’ Multi-Stage Pesticide Application Behavior—A Case Study of Four Provinces in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joan Calzada & Meritxell Gisbert & Bernard Moscoso, 2021. "The hidden cost of bananas: pesticide effects on newborns’ health," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2021/405, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Barlow, P. & Stuckler, D., 2021. "Globalization and health policy space: Introducing the WTOhealth dataset of trade challenges to national health regulations at World Trade Organization, 1995–2016," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Inga C. Melchior & Jens Newig, 2021. "Governing Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture—Taking Stock of an Emerging Field of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Mingyue Li & Yu Liu & Yuhe Huang & Lianbei Wu & Kai Chen, 2022. "Impacts of Risk Perception and Environmental Regulation on Farmers’ Sustainable Behaviors of Agricultural Green Production in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Cecilia Bellora & Jean-Marc Bourgeon, 2016. "Food trade, Biodiversity Effects and Price Volatility," Working Papers 2016-06, CEPII research center.
    6. Lan Tran & Theodoros Skevas & Laura McCann, 2023. "Measuring pesticide overuse and its determinants: Evidence from Vietnamese rice and fruit farms," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(3), pages 417-437, July.
    7. Lemarié, Stéphane & Marcoul, Philippe, 2018. "Coordination and information sharing about pest resistance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 135-149.
    8. Hakan Savaş Sazak & Melis Zeybek, 2022. "The modified maximum likelihood estimators for the parameters of the regression model under bivariate median ranked set sampling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 1069-1109, July.
    9. May Chu, 2020. "Horses for courses: China's accommodative approach to food standard‐setting in response to the internationalization of regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 514-530, July.
    10. Konstantinos B. Simoglou & Emmanouil Roditakis, 2022. "Consumers’ Benefit—Risk Perception on Pesticides and Food Safety—A Survey in Greece," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Berill Takacs & Aiduan Borrion, 2020. "The Use of Life Cycle-Based Approaches in the Food Service Sector to Improve Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, April.
    12. Zhou, Jiehong & Yang, Zhiying & Li, Kai & Yu, Xiaohua, 2019. "Direct intervention or indirect support? The effects of cooperative control measures on farmers’ implementation of quality and safety standards," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Brisbois, Ben & Hoogeveen, Dawn & Allison, Sandra & Cole, Donald & Fyfe, Trina M. & Harder, Henry G. & Parkes, Margot W., 2021. "Storylines of research on resource extraction and health in Canada: A modified metanarrative synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    14. Xie, Hualin & Huang, Yingqian, 2021. "Influencing factors of farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies in China: Meta-analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:288-:d:751672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.