IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i12p2068-d990734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Shadow Values of Soil Hydrological Properties in the Production Potential of Climatic Regionalization of the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Josef Slaboch

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Lukáš Čechura

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Michal Malý

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jiří Mach

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The Czech Republic uses a dual system of agricultural land prices, namely the formal/official price—for tax purposes—and the market price in the case of a standard sale or purchase of farmland. This paper focuses on the construction of an econometric model to quantify the influence of soil hydrological characteristics on the production potential in a given climatic region. It also focuses on the use of this model for the determination of the official price of agricultural land, which is expressed on the basis of the code of the evaluated soil-ecological unit (ESEU) and based on defined soil characteristics. The pricing itself is based on the production potential of the land, which in practice is very important for spatial planning, as it determines the classes of agricultural land protection with regard to the possibility of setting aside agricultural land for non-productive purposes or for drawing subsidies for less favourable areas. In this context, the non-productive functions of agricultural land are also frequently discussed, especially its retention, which plays a very important role in the currently changing climatic conditions. There are a number of studies on soil retention, and numerous approaches to measuring it, but none of them address its impact on production potential and thus on the price of land. For this reason, this paper focuses on defining the influence of the retention of the main soil units (defined for the conditions of the Czech Republic) on production potential. For this definition, SUR models are used, where the endogenous variable is expressed as production potential and the exogenous variables include the basic soil characteristics such as grain size, porosity, hydrological component of the soil, and retention. The obtained outputs show both the high explanatory power of the model and the adequate parametric significance of most variables, which provides sufficient support for the use of the results in practice. In addition, the estimated models across all climatic regions are consistent with substantively logical assumptions about the link between production potential and soil hydrological properties, which secondarily demonstrates their applicability in practice, especially for state administration, but also for local government in the sense of municipalities, cities, and other organizational units.

Suggested Citation

  • Josef Slaboch & Lukáš Čechura & Michal Malý & Jiří Mach, 2022. "The Shadow Values of Soil Hydrological Properties in the Production Potential of Climatic Regionalization of the Czech Republic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2068-:d:990734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2068/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2068/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Zhu & Jennifer Burney & Jinfeng Chang & Zhenong Jin & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Qinchuan Xin & Jialu Xu & Le Yu & David Makowski & Philippe Ciais, 2022. "Warming reduces global agricultural production by decreasing cropping frequency and yields," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(11), pages 1016-1023, November.
    2. Chen, Jian & Yu, Zhenrong & Ouyang, Jinliang & van Mensvoort, M.E.F., 2006. "Factors affecting soil quality changes in the North China Plain: A case study of Quzhou County," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 171-188, December.
    3. Ziolkowska, Jadwiga R., 2015. "Shadow price of water for irrigation—A case of the High Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 20-31.
    4. Martha Lustosa Carvalho & Moacir Tuzzin de Moraes & Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri & Maurício Roberto Cherubin, 2020. "Biochar Amendment Enhances Water Retention in a Tropical Sandy Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Rui Wang & Lijuan Ma & Wei Lv & Jun Li, 2022. "Rotational Tillage: A Sustainable Management Technique for Wheat Production in the Semiarid Loess Plateau," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Xiuli Liu & Xikang Chen & Shouyang Wang, 2009. "Evaluating and Predicting Shadow Prices of Water Resources in China and Its Nine Major River Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1467-1478, June.
    7. Pamela Berry & Fuad Yassin & Kenneth Belcher & Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, 2017. "An Economic Assessment of Local Farm Multi-Purpose Surface Water Retention Systems under Future Climate Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Liebhard, Gunther & Klik, Andreas & Neugschwandtner, Reinhard W. & Nolz, Reinhard, 2022. "Effects of tillage systems on soil water distribution, crop development, and evaporation and transpiration rates of soybean," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Tsur, Yacov, 2020. "Optimal water pricing: Accounting for environmental externalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qing Zhou & Yali Zhang & Feng Wu, 2022. "Can Water Price Improve Water Productivity? A Water-Economic-Model-Based Study in Heihe River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Buttinelli, Rebecca & Cortignani, Raffaele & Caracciolo, Francesco, 2024. "Irrigation water economic value and productivity: An econometric estimation for maize grain production in Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    3. Aixi Han & Ao Liu & Zhenshan Guo & Yi Liang & Li Chai, 2023. "Measuring Gains and Losses in Virtual Water Trade from Environmental and Economic Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(1), pages 195-209, May.
    4. Zamani, Omid & Azadi, Hossein & Mortazavi, Seyed Abolghasem & Balali, Hamid & Moghaddam, Saghi Movahhed & Jurik, Lubos, 2021. "The impact of water-pricing policies on water productivity: Evidence of agriculture sector in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Bopp, Carlos & Jara-Rojas, Roberto & Bravo-Ureta, Boris & Engler, Alejandra, 2022. "Irrigation water use, shadow values and productivity: Evidence from stochastic production frontiers in vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    6. Changhai Qin & Shan Jiang & Yong Zhao & Yongnan Zhu & Qingming Wang & Lizhen Wang & Junlin Qu & Ming Wang, 2022. "Research on Water Rights Trading and Pricing Model between Agriculture and Energy Development in Ningxia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Shen, Xiaobo & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "The shadow prices and demand elasticities of agricultural water in China: A StoNED-based analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 21-28.
    8. Yang, Lun & Liu, Moucheng & Lun, Fei & Min, Qingwen & Li, Wenhua, 2019. "The impacts of farmers’ livelihood capitals on planting decisions: A case study of Zhagana Agriculture-Forestry-Animal Husbandry Composite System," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 208-217.
    9. Jacqueline M. Vadjunec & Amy E. Frazier & Peter Kedron & Todd Fagin & Yun Zhao, 2018. "A Land Systems Science Framework for Bridging Land System Architecture and Landscape Ecology: A Case Study from the Southern High Plains," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Walsh, Michael J. & Gerber Van Doren, Léda & Shete, Nilam & Prakash, Akshay & Salim, Usama, 2018. "Financial tradeoffs of energy and food uses of algal biomass under stochastic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 591-603.
    11. Sampson, Gabriel S. & Hendricks, Nathan P. & Taylor, Mykel R., 2019. "Land market valuation of groundwater," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Hongbin Liu & Yuepeng Zhou, 2018. "Farmers’ Cognition and Behavioral Response towards Cultivated Land Quality Protection in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    13. Kiratu, Nixon Murathi & Aarnoudse, Eefje & Petrick, Martin, 2024. "Irrigation-nutrition linkages under farmer-led and public irrigation schemes in Kenya," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344347, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    14. Hongbin Liu & Yuepeng Zhou, 2018. "Urbanization, Land Use Behavior and Land Quality in Rural China: An Analysis Based on Pressure-Response-Impact Framework and SEM Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Behnaz Hadi & Hossein Ansari & Narges Salehnia, 2024. "Developing a fuzzy integrated index to assess the value of water resources using quantity, quality, and socioeconomic parameters (case study: Mashhad plain)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28611-28640, November.
    16. Steward, David R. & Allen, Andrew J., 2016. "Peak groundwater depletion in the High Plains Aquifer, projections from 1930 to 2110," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 36-48.
    17. Alves, Gabriel de Sampaio Morais & Fulginiti, Lilyan & Perrin, Richard & Braga, Marcelo José, 2021. "The Use Value of Irrigation Water for Brazilian Agriculture," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315861, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Alcon, Francisco & Zabala, José A. & Martínez-García, Victor & Albaladejo, José A. & López-Becerra, Erasmo I. & de-Miguel, María D. & Martínez-Paz, José M., 2022. "The social wellbeing of irrigation water. A demand-side integrated valuation in a Mediterranean agroecosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    19. repec:ags:aaea22:335539 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Hugo Alexander Rondón-Quintana & Fredy Alberto Reyes-Lizcano & Saieth Baudilio Chaves-Pabón & Juan Gabriel Bastidas-Martínez & Carlos Alfonso Zafra-Mejía, 2022. "Use of Biochar in Asphalts: Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    21. Schneider, Kate R., 2022. "Nationally representative estimates of the cost of adequate diets, nutrient level drivers, and policy options for households in rural Malawi," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2068-:d:990734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.