IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i10p1601-d932345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Technical, Allocative, and Economic Efficiencies for Smallholder Broiler Producers in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lindikaya W. Myeki

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
    National Agricultural Marketing Council, MERC Division, 536 Francis Baard St, Arcadia, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • Nkhanedzeni B. Nengovhela

    (Department of Agriculture Land Reform and Rural Development, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
    Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa, Florida 1710, South Africa)

  • Livhuwani Mudau

    (Department of Agriculture Land Reform and Rural Development, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)

  • Elvis Nakana

    (National Agricultural Marketing Council, MERC Division, 536 Francis Baard St, Arcadia, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • Simphiwe Ngqangweni

    (National Agricultural Marketing Council, MERC Division, 536 Francis Baard St, Arcadia, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

Abstract

The prevailing economic conditions as a result of COVID-19, climate change, and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, have led to renewed global interest in the efficiency of the agricultural sector. As a result of this, we investigated the efficiencies of 64 broiler producers in three districts covering the North West and Limpopo provinces in South Africa from 2019 to 2022, using a two-stage data envelopment analysis method with input orientation. The results show that producers operate on the upper bounds toward efficiency, but room for improvement still exists at 10%, 20%, and 28% on technical, allocative, and cost efficiencies. This indicates that inputs can still be reduced without changing the level of output and that the input combination is incompatible with cost minimization. Consequently, only 13%, 8%, and 4% of the sampled broiler producers exhibited technical, allocative, and cost efficiencies, respectively; the majority were women. The Vhembe, Capricorn, and Dr. Kenneth Kaunda (DRKK) districts had vastly different scores for each efficiency type, indicating that their differences in resource endowments, technology, and climate, necessitate the formulation of district-specific policies. The mortality rate, heating costs, and investments in health emerged as significant efficiency determinants. Overall, the findings provide insights into refocusing the country’s poultry sector in light of current shocks and the notable aspirations of the poultry master plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindikaya W. Myeki & Nkhanedzeni B. Nengovhela & Livhuwani Mudau & Elvis Nakana & Simphiwe Ngqangweni, 2022. "Estimation of Technical, Allocative, and Economic Efficiencies for Smallholder Broiler Producers in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1601-:d:932345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esmeralda Ramalho & Joaquim Ramalho & Pedro Henriques, 2010. "Fractional regression models for second stage DEA efficiency analyses," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 239-255, December.
    2. Chien-Ming Chen & Magali A. Delmas & Marvin B. Lieberman, 2015. "Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 19-36, January.
    3. Jenifer Piesse & Helmke Sartorius Von Bach & Colin Thirtle & Johan Van Zyl, 1996. "The efficiency of smallholder agriculture in South Africa," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 125-144.
    4. Busayo Oluwatayo, Isaac & Machethe, Tanya A. & Senyolo, Mmapatla P., 2016. "Profitability And Efficiency Analysis Of Smallholder Broiler Production In Mopani District Of Limpopo Province, South Africa," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 39(1).
    5. Sobia Asghar & Nophea Sasaki & Damien Jourdain & Takuji W. Tsusaka, 2018. "Levels of Technical, Allocative, and Groundwater Use Efficiency and the Factors Affecting the Allocative Efficiency of Wheat Farmers in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Tim J. Coelli & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2005. "Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 115-134, January.
    7. Beatrice Conradie & Jenifer Piesse, 2015. "Productivity benchmarking of free-range sheep operations for Laingsburg, South Africa," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Xiangfei Xin & Yi Zhang & Jimin Wang & John Alexander Nuetah, 2016. "Effects of Farm Size on Technical Efficiency in China's Broiler Sector: A Stochastic Meta-Frontier Approach," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(3), pages 493-516, September.
    9. Mkhabela, Thulasizwe S. & Piesse, Jenifer & Thirtle, Colin G. & Vink, Nick, 2010. "Modelling efficiency with farm-produced inputs: dairying in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Mkhabela, Thulasizwe S., 2005. "Technical efficiency in a vegetable based mixed-cropping sector in Tugela Ferry, Msinga District, KwaZulu-Natal," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(2), pages 1-18, June.
    11. van Zyl, Johan & Binswanger, Hans & Thirtle, Colin, 1995. "The relationship between farm size and efficiency in South African agriculture," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1548, The World Bank.
    12. Marlene Louw & Tracy Davids & Nico Scheltema, 2017. "Broiler production in South Africa: Is there space for smallholders in the commercial chicken coup?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 564-574, September.
    13. Phumzile Ncube, 2018. "The southern African poultry value chain: Corporate strategies, investments and agro-industrial policies," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 369-387, May.
    14. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1979. "Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 339-338, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nisar Ahmed Khan & Majid Ali & Nihal Ahmad & Muhammad Ali Abid & Sigrid Kusch-Brandt, 2022. "Technical Efficiency Analysis of Layer and Broiler Poultry Farmers in Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bright O. Asante & Renato A. Villano & Omphile Temoso, 2024. "Drivers of integrated crop–livestock farming system’s efficiency for smallholder farmers in the forest-savanna transition agro-ecological zone of Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29429-29451, November.
    2. Setene, Letlama & Jordaan, Daniel du P.S., 2021. "The trade-off between chain performance and fragility considering coordination strategies of agri-food chains: a South African egg chain's case study," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), March.
    3. Jakub Staniszewski & Łukasz Kryszak, 2022. "Do Structures Matter in the Process of Sustainable Intensification? A Case Study of Agriculture in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Kao, Chiang, 2010. "Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: The case of Taiwan forests after reorganization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 484-491, December.
    5. Víctor Chang & Beatriz Tovar, 2022. "Efficiency drivers for the South Pacific West coast port terminals: a two-stage non-convex metafrontier dea approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2667-2701, July.
    6. Mutz, Rüdiger & Bornmann, Lutz & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2017. "Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 613-628.
    7. Paolo Esposito & Emanuele Doronzo & Spiridione Lucio Dicorato, 2023. "The financial and green effects of cultural values on mission drifts in European social enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Mutyasira, Vine & Hoag, Dana & Pendell, Dustin & Manning, Dale T. & Berhe, Melaku, 2018. "Assessing the relative sustainability of smallholder farming systems in Ethiopian highlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 83-91.
    9. Gelan, Ayele & Muriithi, Beatrice W., 2015. "Examining Returns to Scale in Smallholder Dairy Farms in East Africa," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 54(3), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Souza, Geraldo da Silva e & Gomes, Eliane Gonçalves & Alves, Eliseu Roberto de Andrade & Gasques, José Garcia, 2020. "Technological progress in the Brazilian agriculture," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Jill Johnes & Maria Portela & Emmanuel Thanassoulis, 2017. "Efficiency in education," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(4), pages 331-338, April.
    12. Tripathy, Prajukta & Jena, Pabitra Kumar & Mishra, Bikash Ranjan, 2024. "Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    14. repec:lan:wpaper:1115 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Bogetoft, Peter & Nielsen, Kurt, 2003. "Yardstick Based Procurement Design In Natural Resource Management," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25910, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Anup Kumar Bhandari & Vipin V, 2018. "Does Export Intensity Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from Basic Metal Industry in India," Working Papers id:12767, eSocialSciences.
    17. Bao Jiang & Enxin Chi & Jian Li, 2022. "Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis for Cross Efficiency Evaluation with Imprecise Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-9, June.
    18. Sheng, Yu & Xu, Xinpeng, 2019. "The productivity impact of climate change: Evidence from Australia's Millennium drought," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 182-191.
    19. Nathan D. DeLay & Nathanael M. Thompson & James R. Mintert, 2022. "Precision agriculture technology adoption and technical efficiency," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 195-219, February.
    20. Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2007. "Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 31-64, January.
    21. Kainth, Gursharan Singh & Bawa, Rajinder Singh, 2013. "Are Disparities in Indian Agriculture Growing? Status, Constraints and Determinants," Working Papers 253314, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1601-:d:932345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.