IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i9p869-d633003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fused Deep Features-Based Grape Varieties Identification Using Support Vector Machine

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Peng

    (Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment and Technology, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    School of Electronic Engineering, Changzhou College of Information Technology, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Shenyi Zhao

    (Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment and Technology, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Jizhan Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment and Technology, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

Proper identification of different grape varieties by smart machinery is of great importance to modern agriculture production. In this paper, a fast and accurate identification method based on Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA), which can fuse different deep features extracted from Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), plus Support Vector Machine (SVM) is proposed. In this research, based on an open dataset, three types of state-of-the-art CNNs, seven species of deep features, and a multi-class SVM classifier were studied. First, the images were resized to meet the input requirements of a CNN. Then, the deep features of the input images were extracted by a specific deep features layer of the CNN. Next, two kinds of deep features from different networks were fused by CCA to increase the effective classification feature information. Finally, a multi-class SVM classifier was trained with the fused features. When applied to an open dataset, the model outcome shows that the fused deep features with any combination can obtain better identification performance than by using a single type of deep feature. The fusion of fc6 (in AlexNet network) and Fc1000 (in ResNet50 network) deep features obtained the best identification performance. The average F1 Score of 96.9% was 8.7% higher compared to the best performance of a single deep feature, i.e., Fc1000 of ResNet101, which was 88.2%. Furthermore, the F1 Score of the proposed method is 2.7% higher than the best performance obtained by using a CNN directly. The experimental results show that the method proposed in this paper can achieve fast and accurate identification of grape varieties. Based on the proposed algorithm, the smart machinery in agriculture can take more targeted measures based on the different characteristics of different grape varieties for further improvement of the yield and quality of grape production.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Peng & Shenyi Zhao & Jizhan Liu, 2021. "Fused Deep Features-Based Grape Varieties Identification Using Support Vector Machine," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:869-:d:633003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/869/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/869/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Durga Prasad Penumuru & Sreekumar Muthuswamy & Premkumar Karumbu, 2020. "Identification and classification of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1229-1241, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimitre D. Dimitrov, 2023. "Internet and Computers for Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, January.
    2. Jianwu Lin & Xiaoyulong Chen & Renyong Pan & Tengbao Cao & Jitong Cai & Yang Chen & Xishun Peng & Tomislav Cernava & Xin Zhang, 2022. "GrapeNet: A Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network Model for Identification of Grape Leaf Diseases," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Ekene Okere & Ebrahiema Arendse & Alemayehu Ambaw Tsige & Willem Jacobus Perold & Umezuruike Linus Opara, 2022. "Pomegranate Quality Evaluation Using Non-Destructive Approaches: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, November.
    2. George Lãzãroiu & Armenia Androniceanu & Iulia Grecu & Gheorghe Grecu & Octav Neguri?ã, 2022. "Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and sustainable cyber-physical management systems in big data-driven cognitive manufacturing," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1047-1080, December.
    3. Christian Kubik & Sebastian Michael Knauer & Peter Groche, 2022. "Smart sheet metal forming: importance of data acquisition, preprocessing and transformation on the performance of a multiclass support vector machine for predicting wear states during blanking," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 259-282, January.
    4. Yi Zhang & Peng Peng & Chongdang Liu & Yanyan Xu & Heming Zhang, 2022. "A sequential resampling approach for imbalanced batch process fault detection in semiconductor manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1057-1072, April.
    5. Swarit Anand Singh & K. A. Desai, 2023. "Automated surface defect detection framework using machine vision and convolutional neural networks," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1995-2011, April.
    6. Benjamin Lutz & Dominik Kisskalt & Andreas Mayr & Daniel Regulin & Matteo Pantano & Jörg Franke, 2021. "In-situ identification of material batches using machine learning for machining operations," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1485-1495, June.
    7. Jorge L. Alonso-Perez & Selene L. Cardenas-Maciel & Balter Trujillo-Navarrete & Edgar A. Reynoso-Soto & Nohe R. Cazarez-Cazarez, 2022. "An approach for designing smart manufacturing for the research and development of dye-sensitize solar cell," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 2307-2320, December.
    8. Penglei Dai & Mahdi Hassan & Xuerong Sun & Ming Zhang & Zhengwei Bian & Dikai Liu, 2022. "A framework for multi-robot coverage analysis of large and complex structures," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1545-1560, June.
    9. Michael D. T. McDonnell & Daniel Arnaldo & Etienne Pelletier & James A. Grant-Jacob & Matthew Praeger & Dimitris Karnakis & Robert W. Eason & Ben Mills, 2021. "Machine learning for multi-dimensional optimisation and predictive visualisation of laser machining," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1471-1483, June.
    10. Sinan Uguz & Osman Ipek, 2022. "Prediction of the parameters affecting the performance of compact heat exchangers with an innovative design using machine learning techniques," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1393-1417, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:869-:d:633003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.