IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i12p1283-d704079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AgriTech Innovators: A Study of Initial Adoption and Continued Use of a Mobile Digital Platform by Family-Operated Farming Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Fox

    (Irish Institute of Digital Business, Dublin City University, Collins Avenue, D09 Y5N0 Dublin, Ireland)

  • John Mooney

    (Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, Pepperdine University, 24255 Pacific Coast Hwy, Malibu, CA 90263, USA)

  • Pierangelo Rosati

    (Irish Institute of Digital Business, Dublin City University, Collins Avenue, D09 Y5N0 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Theo Lynn

    (Irish Institute of Digital Business, Dublin City University, Collins Avenue, D09 Y5N0 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

While information technology is playing a significant transformative role in virtually every industry, within the agriculture sector, family-operated farming enterprises have been slow to adopt IT solutions to manage their operations. This study adopts a sequential mixed-methods research design to examine the pre- and post-adoption phases of farmers’ use of a mobile digital platform for farm management. Our findings show that farmers’ initial acceptance of a mobile digital platform for farm management is shaped by social influence, which mediates the impact of performance and effort expectancy. Post-adoption continued use of the digital platform is influenced directly by performance and effort expectancy and indirectly by trust beliefs and social influence. Perceived work impediment indirectly influences post-adoption acceptance via effort expectancy. Our study untangles the direct and indirect influences of positive and negative perceptions on farmers’ acceptance of a new innovative AgriTech digital platform in these different phases.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Fox & John Mooney & Pierangelo Rosati & Theo Lynn, 2021. "AgriTech Innovators: A Study of Initial Adoption and Continued Use of a Mobile Digital Platform by Family-Operated Farming Enterprises," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1283-:d:704079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1283/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1283/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Son, Minhee & Han, Kyesook, 2011. "Beyond the technology adoption: Technology readiness effects on post-adoption behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 1178-1182.
    2. Jahanmir, Sara F. & Cavadas, Joana, 2018. "Factors affecting late adoption of digital innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 337-343.
    3. Thia Hennessy & Doris Läpple & Brian Moran, 2016. "The Digital Divide in Farming: A Problem of Access or Engagement?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 474-491.
    4. Rieple, Alison & Snijders, Sylvia, 2018. "The role of emotions in the choice to adopt, or resist, innovations by Irish dairy farmers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 23-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Issa, Helmi & Jabbouri, Rachid & Palmer, Mark, 2022. "An artificial intelligence (AI)-readiness and adoption framework for AgriTech firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Hayet Kerras & María Francisca Rosique Contreras & Susana Bautista & María Dolores de-Miguel Gómez, 2022. "Is the Rural Population Caught in the Whirlwind of the Digital Divide?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Osrof, Hazem Yusuf & Tan, Cheng Ling & Angappa, Gunasekaran & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Kim Hua, 2023. "Adoption of smart farming technologies in field operations: A systematic review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Joana Colussi & Eric L. Morgan & Gary D. Schnitkey & Antônio D. Padula, 2022. "How Communication Affects the Adoption of Digital Technologies in Soybean Production: A Survey in Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas & Rahat, Birjees & Naqvi, Bushra & Umar, Muhammad, 2024. "Revolutionizing finance: The synergy of fintech, digital adoption, and innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Yi, Jisu & Lee, Youseok & Suh, Jungmin & Kim, Sang-Hoon, 2022. "Psychological determinants of non-attendees’ resistance toward performing arts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 690-699.
    4. Chandra S. R. Nuthalapati & Chaitanya Nuthalapati, 2021. "Has Open Innovation Taken Root in India? Evidence from Startups Working in Food Value Chains," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1207-1230, December.
    5. Nan Hao & Mingxing Ji, 2023. "Development of Platform Economy and Urban–Rural Income Gap: Theoretical Deductions and Empirical Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Kwon, Ohbyung & Lee, Namyeon & Shin, Bongsik, 2014. "Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 387-394.
    7. Xiaolu Wei & Junhu Ruan, 2022. "Influences of Government Policies and Farmers’ Cognition on Farmers’ Participation Willingness and Behaviors in E-Commerce Interest Linkage Mechanisms during Farmer–Enterprise Games," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Heidenreich, Sven & Killmer, Jan F. & Millemann, Jan A., 2022. "If at first you don't adopt - Investigating determinants of new product leapfrogging behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Sven Heidenreich & Katrin Talke, 2020. "Consequences of mandated usage of innovations in organizations: developing an innovation decision model of symbolic and forced adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 279-298, December.
    11. Ufer, Danielle J. & Ortega, David L. & Wolf, Christopher A. & McKendree, Melissa & Swanson, Janice, 2022. "Getting past the gatekeeper: Key motivations of dairy farmer intent to adopt animal health and welfare-improving biotechnology," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Andrews, Lynda & Bianchi, Constanza, 2013. "Consumer internet purchasing behavior in Chile," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1791-1799.
    13. Ramzi El-Haddadeh, 0. "Digital Innovation Dynamics Influence on Organisational Adoption: The Case of Cloud Computing Services," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    14. Basharat Ali & Nazim Baluch & Zulkifli Mohamed Udin, 2015. "The Moderating Effect of Religiosity on the Relationship between Trust and Diffusion of Electronic Commerce," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(13), pages 176-176, December.
    15. Friedman, Nicola & Ormiston, Jarrod, 2022. "Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Balaine, Lorraine & Dillon, Emma J. & Läpple, Doris & Lynch, John, 2020. "Can technology help achieve sustainable intensification? Evidence from milk recording on Irish dairy farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Gombault, Anne & Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Décamps, Aurélien, 2016. "ICT adoption in heritage organizations: Crossing the chasm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5135-5140.
    18. Jahanmir, Sara F. & Silva, Graça Miranda & Gomes, Paulo J. & Gonçalves, Helena Martins, 2020. "Determinants of users’ continuance intention toward digital innovations: Are late adopters different?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 225-233.
    19. El Barachi, May & Salim, Taghreed Abu & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Mathew, Sujith & Badewi, Amgad & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2022. "The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Qi Song & Xiaohong Chen & Hao Gu, 2023. "How Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Drive Enterprise Digital Innovation: Analysis Based on the Dynamic FsQCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1283-:d:704079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.