IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i10p1012-d657973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nitrous Oxide Emission and Crop Yield in Arable Soil Amended with Bottom Ash

Author

Listed:
  • Do-Yeong Hur

    (Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea)

  • Sung-Un Kim

    (Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea
    Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea)

  • Hyeon-Cheol Park

    (Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea)

  • Keun-Ki Kim

    (Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea)

  • Hong-Ju Son

    (Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea)

  • Kwang-Min Lee

    (Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea)

  • Yu-Jin Kim

    (Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea)

  • Chang-Oh Hong

    (Department of Life Science and Environmental Biochemistry, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea
    Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea)

Abstract

Bottom ash (BA), a byproduct of coal combustion from electric power plants with a porous surface texture and high pH, may influence the physical and chemical properties of upland arable soil associated with nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emission from upland soil. This study evaluated the use of BA in mitigating N 2 O emissions from upland arable soil and increasing the crop yield. In a field experiment, N 2 O emitted from the soil was monitored weekly in a closed chamber over a 2-year period (2018–2019). BA was applied to upland soil at the rates of 0, 200, and 400 Mg·ha −1 . Cumulative N 2 O emission significantly decreased with increasing BA application rate; it decreased by 55% with a BA application rate of 400 Mg·ha −1 compared with the control. Yield-scaled N 2 O emission decreased with increasing BA application rates of up to 200 Mg·ha −1 . Water-filled pore spaces (WFPS) were 70.2%, 52.9%, and 45.3% at the rates of 0, 200, and 400 Mg·ha −1 , respectively, during the growing season. For economic viability and environmental conservation, we suggest that BA application at a rate of 200 Mg·ha −1 reduces N 2 O emissions per unit of crop production.

Suggested Citation

  • Do-Yeong Hur & Sung-Un Kim & Hyeon-Cheol Park & Keun-Ki Kim & Hong-Ju Son & Kwang-Min Lee & Yu-Jin Kim & Chang-Oh Hong, 2021. "Nitrous Oxide Emission and Crop Yield in Arable Soil Amended with Bottom Ash," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:1012-:d:657973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/1012/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/1012/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cameron M. Pittelkow & Xinqiang Liang & Bruce A. Linquist & Kees Jan van Groenigen & Juhwan Lee & Mark E. Lundy & Natasja van Gestel & Johan Six & Rodney T. Venterea & Chris van Kessel, 2015. "Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 517(7534), pages 365-368, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guangshuai Wang & Zhenjie Du & Huifeng Ning & Hao Liu & Sunusi Amin Abubakar & Yang Gao, 2021. "Changes in GHG Emissions Based on Irrigation Water Quality in Short-Term Incubated Agricultural Soil of the North China Plain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Nana Chen & Xin Zhao & Shuxian Dou & Aixing Deng & Chengyan Zheng & Tiehua Cao & Zhenwei Song & Weijian Zhang, 2023. "The Tradeoff between Maintaining Maize ( Zea mays L.) Productivity and Improving Soil Quality under Conservation Tillage Practice in Semi-Arid Region of Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. J. Carl Ureta & Lucas Clay & Marzieh Motallebi & Joan Ureta, 2020. "Quantifying the Landscape’s Ecological Benefits—An Analysis of the Effect of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Peipei Yang & Wenxu Dong & Marius Heinen & Wei Qin & Oene Oenema, 2022. "Soil Compaction Prevention, Amelioration and Alleviation Measures Are Effective in Mechanized and Smallholder Agriculture: A Meta-Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Anantha, K.H. & Garg, Kaushal K. & Barron, Jennie & Dixit, Sreenath & Venkataradha, A. & Singh, Ramesh & Whitbread, Anthony M., 2021. "Impact of best management practices on sustainable crop production and climate resilience in smallholder farming systems of South Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    7. Luncheng You & Gerard H. Ros & Yongliang Chen & Qi Shao & Madaline D. Young & Fusuo Zhang & Wim de Vries, 2023. "Global mean nitrogen recovery efficiency in croplands can be enhanced by optimal nutrient, crop and soil management practices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Wondimagegn Tesfaye & Garrick Blalock & Nyasha Tirivayi, 2021. "Climate‐Smart Innovations and Rural Poverty in Ethiopia: Exploring Impacts and Pathways," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 878-899, May.
    9. Katharina Helming & Katrin Daedlow & Bernd Hansjürgens & Thomas Koellner, 2018. "Assessment and Governance of Sustainable Soil Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Heena Panchasara & Nahidul Hoque Samrat & Nahina Islam, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Mitigation Measures in Australian Agriculture Sector—A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Bacar Abdallah Abderemane & Malika Fakiri & Omar Idrissi & Aziz Baidani & Abdelmonim Zeroual & Elisabetta Mazzucotelli & Hakan Özkan & Ilaria Marcotuli & Agata Gadaleta & Chafika Houasli, 2023. "Evaluation of the Productive Potential of a World Collection of Chickpeas ( Cicer arietinum L.) for the Initiation of Breeding Programs for Adaptation to Conservation Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Lalani, Baqir & Aminpour, Payam & Gray, Steven & Williams, Meredith & Büchi, Lucie & Haggar, Jeremy & Grabowski, Philip & Dambiro, José, 2021. "Mapping farmer perceptions, Conservation Agriculture practices and on-farm measurements: The role of systems thinking in the process of adoption," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Kumara, T.M. Kiran & Kandpal, Ankita & Pal, Suresh, 2019. "Determinants and Impacts of Conservation Agriculture in South Asia: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidences," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 74(03), March.
    14. Tambo, J. & Mockshell, J., 2018. "Differential impacts of conservation agriculture technology options on household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277035, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Dazhuan Ge & Hualou Long & Li Ma & Yingnan Zhang & Shuangshuang Tu, 2017. "Analysis Framework of China’s Grain Production System: A Spatial Resilience Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Dardonville, Manon & Legrand, Baptiste & Clivot, Hugues & Bernardin, Claire & Bockstaller, Christian & Therond, Olivier, 2022. "Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Alberts Auzins & Ieva Leimane & Agnese Krievina & Inga Morozova & Andris Miglavs & Peteris Lakovskis, 2023. "Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Performance of Crop Production in Relation to Crop Rotation, Catch Crops, and Tillage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Adam M. Komarek, 2018. "Conservation agriculture in western China increases productivity and profits without decreasing resilience," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(5), pages 1251-1262, October.
    19. Haowei Ni & Han Hu & Constantin M. Zohner & Weigen Huang & Ji Chen & Yishen Sun & Jixian Ding & Jizhong Zhou & Xiaoyuan Yan & Jiabao Zhang & Yuting Liang & Thomas W. Crowther, 2024. "Effects of winter soil warming on crop biomass carbon loss from organic matter degradation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Somasundaram Jayaraman & Yash P. Dang & Anandkumar Naorem & Kathryn L. Page & Ram C. Dalal, 2021. "Conservation Agriculture as a System to Enhance Ecosystem Services," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:1012-:d:657973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.