IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i5p150-d353856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Soil N 2 O Emissions in Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Study from China around 2006 when Agricultural Tax Was Abolished

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaocang Xu

    (School of Economics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

  • Lu Zhang

    (Research Center for Economy of Upper Reaches of the Yangtse River/School of Economics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

  • Linhong Chen

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China
    School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Chengjie Liu

    (School of Economics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

Abstract

The decision in 2006 to abolish the agricultural tax, which had lasted for thousands of years, contributed to the prosperity of agriculture, and with it the growing importance of soil N 2 O emissions in China. However, most of the previous literature ignored soil N 2 O emissions due to their too small share in total agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This paper attempts to take soil N 2 O emissions as an important variable in the measurement of agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP), which incorporates environmental pollution into the analytical framework of agricultural production efficiency. Three impressive results were found. Firstly, soil N 2 O emissions play an increasingly important role in agricultural GHG emissions. The proportion of soil N 2 O emissions in agricultural GHG emissions increased from 4.52% in 1998 to 4.83% in 2006, and then to 5.36% in 2016. Secondly, the regional difference of soil N 2 O emissions in AGTFP is visible. In 2016, although soil N 2 O emissions accounted for a small proportion (about 5%) of the total agricultural GHG emissions in China, the AGTFP including soil N 2 O emissions was much lower than that excluding soil N 2 O emissions, especially in areas with high agricultural and population density. Finally, over time, soil N 2 O emissions have had an increasing effect on AGTFP. Compared with 1998–2006, the impact of excluding soil N 2 O emissions on AGTFP in 2007–2016 was more evident than that including soil N 2 O emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaocang Xu & Lu Zhang & Linhong Chen & Chengjie Liu, 2020. "The Role of Soil N 2 O Emissions in Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Study from China around 2006 when Agricultural Tax Was Abolished," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:5:p:150-:d:353856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/5/150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/5/150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David K. Lambert & Elliott Parker, 1998. "Productivity in Chinese Provincial Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 378-392, September.
    2. Tim J. Coelli & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2005. "Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 115-134, January.
    3. Felix Akrofi-Atitianti & Chinwe Ifejika Speranza & Louis Bockel & Richard Asare, 2018. "Assessing Climate Smart Agriculture and Its Determinants of Practice in Ghana: A Case of the Cocoa Production System," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Dave S. Reay & Eric A. Davidson & Keith A. Smith & Pete Smith & Jerry M. Melillo & Frank Dentener & Paul J. Crutzen, 2012. "Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(6), pages 410-416, June.
    5. Bayarsaihan, T. & Coelli, T. J., 2003. "Productivity growth in pre-1990 Mongolian agriculture: spiralling disaster or emerging success?," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-137, March.
    6. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    7. repec:bla:rdevec:v:5:y:2001:i:3:p:375-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Xiaocang Xu & Linhong Chen, 2019. "Projection of Long-Term Care Costs in China, 2020–2050: Based on the Bayesian Quantile Regression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingwei Wang & Liang Guo, 2021. "How to Promote University Students to Innovative Use Renewable Energy? An Inquiry-Based Learning Course Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Haisheng Chen & Shuiping Zhu & Jianjun Sun & Kaiyang Zhong & Manhong Shen & Xiaoli Wang, 2022. "A Study of the Spatial Structure and Regional Interaction of Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in China Based on SNA and VAR Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Chong Wang & Wei Lu & Ryuzo Ohno & Zongchao Gu, 2020. "Effect of Wall Texture on Perceptual Spaciousness of Indoor Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhushan, S., 2016. "TFP Growth of Wheat and Paddy in Post-Green Revolution Era in India: Parametric and Non-Parametric Analysis," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 29(1).
    2. Zhuohui Yu & Qingning Lin & Changli Huang, 2022. "Re-Measurement of Agriculture Green Total Factor Productivity in China from a Carbon Sink Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, November.
    3. K Hervé Dakpo & Yann Desjeux & Philippe Jeanneaux & Laure Latruffe, 2017. "Productivity, technical efficiency and technological change in French agriculture during 2002-2014: A Färe-Primont index decomposition," Working Papers SMART 17-07, INRAE UMR SMART.
    4. Shokoohi, Maryam & Kavoosi Kalashami, Mohammad & Serajzadeh, Farzad, 2011. "Investigating Agricultural Productivity Growth and Convergence in Iran and Eastern African Countries," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 1(4), pages 1-5, December.
    5. Gong, Binlei, 2020. "Agricultural productivity convergence in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Zhangqi Zhong & Yiqin Hu & Lei Jiang, 2019. "Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Based on Spatial Panel Data Model: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Cassiano Bragagnolo & Humberto F. S. Spolador & Geraldo Sant’Ana de Camargo Barros, 2010. "Regional Brazilian Agriculture TFP Analysis: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis Approach," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 11(4), pages 217-242.
    8. Rui Jiang & Chunxue Liu & Xiaowei Liu & Shuai Zhang, 2022. "Space–Time Effect of Green Total Factor Productivity in Mineral Resources Industry in China: Based on Space–Time Semivariogram and SPVAR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Lingzhang Kong & Jinye Li, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from Province-Level Empirical Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Ashrafi, Ali & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Lee, Lai Soon & Lee, Chew Ging, 2013. "The efficiency of the hotel industry in Singapore," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 31-34.
    11. Büschken, Joachim, 2009. "When does data envelopment analysis outperform a naïve efficiency measurement model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 647-657, January.
    12. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2021. "Does China's new energy vehicle industry innovate efficiently? A three-stage dynamic network slacks-based measure approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Ke Liu & Yurong Qiao & Qian Zhou, 2021. "Analysis of China’s Industrial Green Development Efficiency and Driving Factors: Research Based on MGWR," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Xiao Zhang & Di Wang, 2023. "Beyond the Ecological Boundary: A Quasi-Natural Experiment on the Impact of National Marine Parks on Eco-Efficiency in Coastal Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Honma, Satoshi, 2012. "Environmental and economic efficiencies in the Asia-Pacific region," MPRA Paper 43361, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Boqin Xie & Chenjuan Ma & Junqiao Wang, 2020. "Independent and Combined Relationships of Perceived Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Physical Frailty on Functional Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Sheng, Yu & Xu, Xinpeng, 2019. "The productivity impact of climate change: Evidence from Australia's Millennium drought," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 182-191.
    18. Yakun Wang & Jingli Jiang & Dongqing Wang & Xinshang You, 2022. "Can Mechanization Promote Green Agricultural Production? An Empirical Analysis of Maize Production in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Kainth, Gursharan Singh & Bawa, Rajinder Singh, 2013. "Are Disparities in Indian Agriculture Growing? Status, Constraints and Determinants," Working Papers 253314, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    20. Ruijing Zheng & Yu Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Wei Chen & Xiaodong Chen & Yaping Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Drivers of Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:5:p:150-:d:353856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.