IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2019i1p6-d302490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Sequestration and Contribution of CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O Fluxes to Global Warming Potential from Paddy-Fallow Fields on Mineral Soil Beneath Peat in Central Hokkaido, Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Habib Mohammad Naser

    (Laboratory of Soil Science, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-Ku, Kita-9, Nishi-9, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
    Present address: Soil Science Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh.)

  • Osamu Nagata

    (Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 1-2-1, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 100-8950, Japan)

  • Sarmin Sultana

    (Laboratory of Soil Science, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-Ku, Kita-9, Nishi-9, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
    Present address: Soil Science Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh.)

  • Ryusuke Hatano

    (Laboratory of Soil Science, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-Ku, Kita-9, Nishi-9, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan)

Abstract

Since each greenhouse gas (GHG) has its own radiative capacity, all three gasses (CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O) must be accounted for by calculating the net global warming potential (GWP) in a crop production system. To compare the impact of GHG fluxes from the rice growing and the fallow season on the annual gas fluxes, and their contribution to the GWP and carbon sequestration (CS) were evaluated. From May to April in Bibai (43°18′ N, 141°44′ E), in central Hokkaido, Japan, three rice paddy fields under actual management conditions were investigated to determine CS and the contribution of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes to GWP. Methane and N 2 O fluxes were measured by placing the chamber over the rice plants covering four hills and CO 2 fluxes from rice plants root free space in paddy fields were taken as an indicator of soil microbial respiration (R m ) using the closed chamber method. Soil CS was calculated as the difference between net primary production (NPP) and loss of carbon (C) through R m , emission of CH 4 and harvest of crop C. Annual cumulative R m ranged from 422 to 519 g C m −2 yr −1 ; which accounted for 54.7 to 55.5% of the rice growing season in particular. Annual cumulative CH 4 emissions ranged from 75.5 to 116 g C m −2 yr −1 and this contribution occurred entirely during the rice growing period. Total cumulative N 2 O emissions ranged from 0.091 to 0.154 g N m −2 yr −1 and from 73.5 to 81.3% of the total N 2 O emissions recorded during the winter-fallow season. The CS ranged from −305 to −365 g C m −2 yr −1 , suggesting that C input by NPP may not be compensate for the loss of soil C. The loss of C in the winter-fallow season was much higher (62 to 66%) than in the growing season. The annual net GWP from the investigated paddy fields ranged from 3823 to 5016 g CO 2 equivalent m −2 yr −1 . Annual GWP CH4 accounted for 71.9 to 86.1% of the annual net GWP predominantly from the rice growing period. These results indicate that CH 4 dominated the net GWP of the rice paddy.

Suggested Citation

  • Habib Mohammad Naser & Osamu Nagata & Sarmin Sultana & Ryusuke Hatano, 2019. "Carbon Sequestration and Contribution of CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O Fluxes to Global Warming Potential from Paddy-Fallow Fields on Mineral Soil Beneath Peat in Central Hokkaido, Japan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:6-:d:302490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yo Toma & Nukhak Nufita Sari & Koh Akamatsu & Shingo Oomori & Osamu Nagata & Seiichi Nishimura & Benito H. Purwanto & Hideto Ueno, 2019. "Effects of Green Manure Application and Prolonging Mid-Season Drainage on Greenhouse Gas Emission from Paddy Fields in Ehime, Southwestern Japan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Jie Tang & Shuang Liang & Zhaoyang Li & Hao Zhang & Sining Wang & Nan Zhang, 2016. "Emission Laws and Influence Factors of Greenhouse Gases in Saline-Alkali Paddy Fields," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Bouman, B. A. M. & Tuong, T. P., 2001. "Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 11-30, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brinkhoff, James & Houborg, Rasmus & Dunn, Brian W., 2022. "Rice ponding date detection in Australia using Sentinel-2 and Planet Fusion imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    2. Kriti Poudel & Ram Hari Timilsina & Anish Bhattarai, 2020. "Effect Of Crop Establishment Methods On Yield Of Spring Rice At Khairahani, Chitwan, Nepal," Big Data In Agriculture (BDA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 6-11, November.
    3. Manel Ben Hassen & Federica Monaco & Arianna Facchi & Marco Romani & Giampiero Valè & Guido Sali, 2017. "Economic Performance of Traditional and Modern Rice Varieties under Different Water Management Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, February.
    4. Ehsan Moradi & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Enric Terol & Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Alexandre Marco da Silva & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Hassan Khosravi & Manuel Pulido Fernández & Artemi Cerdà, 2020. "Quantifying Soil Compaction in Persimmon Orchards Using ISUM (Improved Stock Unearthing Method) and Core Sampling Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Yufeng Luo & Haolong Fu & Seydou Traore, 2014. "Biodiversity Conservation in Rice Paddies in China: Toward Ecological Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Senthilkumar, K. & Bindraban, P.S. & Thiyagarajan, T.M. & de Ridder, N. & Giller, K.E., 2008. "Modified rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India: Yield gains and farmers' (lack of) acceptance," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 82-94, September.
    7. Cao, Jingjing & Tan, Junwei & Cui, Yuanlai & Luo, Yufeng, 2019. "Irrigation scheduling of paddy rice using short-term weather forecast data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 714-723.
    8. Ponsioen, Thomas C. & Hengsdijk, Huib & Wolf, Joost & van Ittersum, Martin K. & Rotter, Reimund P. & Son, Tran Thuc & Laborte, Alice G., 2006. "TechnoGIN, a tool for exploring and evaluating resource use efficiency of cropping systems in East and Southeast Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 80-100, January.
    9. Han, Yu & Zhang, Zhongxue & Li, Tiecheng & Chen, Peng & Nie, Tangzhe & Zhang, Zuohe & Du, Sicheng, 2023. "Straw return alleviates the greenhouse effect of paddy fields by increasing soil organic carbon sequestration under water-saving irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    10. Amarasingha, R.P.R.K. & Suriyagoda, L.D.B. & Marambe, B. & Gaydon, D.S. & Galagedara, L.W. & Punyawardena, R. & Silva, G.L.L.P. & Nidumolu, U. & Howden, M., 2015. "Simulation of crop and water productivity for rice (Oryza sativa L.) using APSIM under diverse agro-climatic conditions and water management techniques in Sri Lanka," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 132-143.
    11. Alhaj Hamoud, Yousef & Guo, Xiangping & Wang, Zhenchang & Shaghaleh, Hiba & Chen, Sheng & Hassan, Alfadil & Bakour, Ahmad, 2019. "Effects of irrigation regime and soil clay content and their interaction on the biological yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-use efficiency of rice grown in southern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 934-946.
    12. Choudhury, B.U. & Singh, Anil Kumar & Pradhan, S., 2013. "Estimation of crop coefficients of dry-seeded irrigated rice–wheat rotation on raised beds by field water balance method in the Indo-Gangetic plains, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 20-31.
    13. Wang, Hong & Zhang, Yan & Zhang, Yaojun & McDaniel, Marshall D. & Sun, Lan & Su, Wei & Fan, Xiaorong & Liu, Shuhua & Xiao, Xin, 2020. "Water-saving irrigation is a ‘win-win’ management strategy in rice paddies – With both reduced greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    14. Nittaya Cha-un & Amnat Chidthaisong & Kazuyuki Yagi & Sirintornthep Towprayoon, 2021. "Simulating the Long-Term Effects of Fertilizer and Water Management on Grain Yield and Methane Emissions of Paddy Rice in Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Liang, Kaiming & Zhong, Xuhua & Huang, Nongrong & Lampayan, Rubenito M. & Pan, Junfeng & Tian, Ka & Liu, Yanzhuo, 2016. "Grain yield, water productivity and CH4 emission of irrigated rice in response to water management in south China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 319-331.
    16. Ahmad Numery Ashfaqul Haque & Md. Kamal Uddin & Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman & Adibah Mohd Amin & Mahmud Hossain & Zakaria M. Solaiman & Azharuddin Abd Aziz & Mehnaz Mosharrof, 2022. "Combined Use of Biochar with 15 Nitrogen Labelled Urea Increases Rice Yield, N Use Efficiency and Fertilizer N Recovery under Water-Saving Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Patel, D.P. & Das, Anup & Munda, G.C. & Ghosh, P.K. & Bordoloi, Juri Sandhya & Kumar, Manoj, 2010. "Evaluation of yield and physiological attributes of high-yielding rice varieties under aerobic and flood-irrigated management practices in mid-hills ecosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1269-1276, September.
    18. Krauß, Michael & Kraatz, Simone & Drastig, Katrin & Prochnow, Annette, 2015. "The influence of dairy management strategies on water productivity of milk production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 175-186.
    19. Dasgupta, Pragna & Das, Bhabani S. & Sen, Soumitra K., 2015. "Soil water potential and recoverable water stress in drought tolerant and susceptible rice varieties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 110-118.
    20. Yang, Jia & Ren, Wei & Ouyang, Ying & Feng, Gary & Tao, Bo & Granger, Joshua J. & Poudel, Krishna P., 2019. "Projection of 21st century irrigation water requirement across the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 60-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:6-:d:302490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.