IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i10p241-d1488719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicriteria Analysis of Innovation Ecosystems and the Impact of Human Capital and Investments on Brazilian Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Reinaldo Silva Neto

    (Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco, Campus Agreste, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil)

  • Miguel Gustavo Gomes da Silva

    (Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco, Campus Agreste, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil)

  • Fernando Henrique Taques

    (Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco, Campus Agreste, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil
    Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Thiago Poleto

    (Department of Business Administration, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil)

  • Thyago Celso Cavalcante Nepomuceno

    (Department of Statistics, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-560, Brazil)

  • Victor Diogho Heuer de Carvalho

    (Technologies Axis, Campus do Sertão, Federal University of Alagoas, Delmiro Gouveia 57480-000, Brazil)

  • Madson Bruno da Silva Monte

    (Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió 57072-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Innovation is one of the main factors associated with industrial growth, as it contributes to increased productivity, sustainability, and international competitiveness. There is a certain degree of complexity in measuring innovation, since there are various metrics for this purpose, and each sector of the economy handles it differently. In Brazil, the Industrial Survey of Technological Innovation (PINTEC) was developed to construct sectorial indicators on innovation activities. Based on these data, this paper investigates how ten sectors of the economy performed during two historical series (2011 to 2014 and 2014 to 2017) considering five criteria linked to the innovation process and the impact of qualified human capital. The problem is analyzed in light of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), using preference ranking organization methods for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE II) to provide a ranking of Brazilian industrial sectors. The results show how the sectors have changed over the years, highlighting that innovation expenditure proved crucial in measuring companies’ commitment to innovation, but also show that a highly qualified workforce emerged as a leading factor. Furthermore, the research presents which criteria have contributed positively and negatively to each sector, which can serve as drivers for policy formulation to strengthen the Brazilian industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Reinaldo Silva Neto & Miguel Gustavo Gomes da Silva & Fernando Henrique Taques & Thiago Poleto & Thyago Celso Cavalcante Nepomuceno & Victor Diogho Heuer de Carvalho & Madson Bruno da Silva Mo, 2024. "Multicriteria Analysis of Innovation Ecosystems and the Impact of Human Capital and Investments on Brazilian Industries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:241-:d:1488719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/10/241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/10/241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Osman Gök & Sinem Peker, 2017. "Understanding the links among innovation performance, market performance and financial performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 605-631, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende Costa, 2022. "In search of understanding about knowledge and learning on innovation performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3995-4022, July.
    3. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti, 2021. "Banks' business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2656-2670, July.
    4. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Mariani, Marcello & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2023. "The consequences of innovation failure: An innovation capabilities and dynamic capabilities perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Wilson, Grant Alexander & Case, Tyler & Dobni, C. Brooke, 2023. "A global study of innovation-oriented firms: Dimensions, practices, and performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Kurtmollaiev, Seidali & Lervik-Olsen, Line & Andreassen, Tor W., 2022. "Competing through innovation: Let the customer judge!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 87-101.
    7. Ali E. Akgün & Halit Keskin & Sumeyye Y. Kırçovalı, 2019. "Organizational wisdom practices and firm product innovation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 57-91, February.
    8. Chien-Hsiang Huang & Chih-Wen Ting & Tai-Wei Chang & Yue-Shi Lee & Show-Jane Yen, 2023. "The Impact of Ethical Leadership on Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Environmentally Proactive Strategy and the Moderating Role of Institutional Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Saeid Homayoun & Bita Mashayekhi & Amin Jahangard & Milad Samavat & Zabihollah Rezaee, 2023. "The Controversial Link between CSR and Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Wang, Nannan & Gong, Zheng & Xu, Zhuhuizi & Liu, Zhankun & Han, Yu, 2021. "A quantitative investigation of the technological innovation in large construction companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Vittori, Davide & Natalicchio, Angelo & Panniello, Umberto & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Albino, Vito & Cupertino, Francesco, 2024. "Failure is an option: How failure can lead to disruptive innovations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Wei Wang & Xue-Zhou Zhao & Feng-Wen Chen & Chia-Huei Wu & Sangbing Tsai & Jiangtao Wang, 2019. "The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Attention on Innovation Performance: Evidence from High-polluting Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Khalil Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2021. "Learning from innovation failures: a systematic review of the literature and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 189-234, February.
    14. Evans, Olaniyi, 2018. "Improved Financial Performance Without Improved Operational Efficiency: The Case of Nigerian Firms," MPRA Paper 118202, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Vladimír Baláž & Tomáš Jeck & Miroslav Balog, 2023. "Firm performance over innovation cycle: evidence from a small European economy," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Abdullah, Hariem & Tursoy, Turgut, 2021. "Capital structure and firm performance: a panel causality test," MPRA Paper 105871, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Olivia Fachrunnisa & Ardian Adhiatma & Heru Kurnianto Tjahjono, 2020. "Cognitive Collective Engagement: Relating Knowledge-Based Practices and Innovation Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 743-765, June.
    18. Hariem Abdullah & Turgut Tursoy, 2021. "Capital structure and firm performance: evidence of Germany under IFRS adoption," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 379-398, February.
    19. Muhammd Istan, 2024. "Analysis of the Influence of Assets Structure, Earning Volatility, and Financial Flexibility on Capital Structure and Corporate Performance in Manufacturing Sector Companies on the IDX," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 49-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:241-:d:1488719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.