IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i4p173-d981043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking of Corporate Governance Dimensions: A Delphi Study

Author

Listed:
  • Norita Mohd Noor

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Kolej Universiti Poly-Tech MARA, Jalan 6/91, Taman Shamelin Perkasa, Kuala Lumpur 56100, Malaysia)

  • Amran Rasli

    (Faculty of Business and Communication, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

  • Mas Anom Abdul Rashid

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Kolej Universiti Poly-Tech MARA, Jalan 6/91, Taman Shamelin Perkasa, Kuala Lumpur 56100, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Faraz Mubarak

    (School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, K. Donelaičio g. 73, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Imelda Hermilinda Abas

    (School of Liberal Arts, Main Campus, Shinawatra University, Pathum Thani 12160, Thailand)

Abstract

Most research on Initial Public Offering (IPO) focuses on the financial aspects of a company; previous research on corporate governance tended to focus on factors that influence the company proceeding with IPO. Few researchers studied the aspect of leadership using corporate governance as means to achieve company growth and IPO. This study seeks to identify dimensions deemed as important for corporate governance from the Malaysian perspective by using a two-round Delphi Method. The consistency of the ranking of these dimensions was then determined using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance. The order of importance for the nine dimensions uncovered from the Delphi Method are as follows: (1) Leadership; (2) Board Structure; (3) Vision, Mission and Strategies; (4) Policies, Process and Procedures; (5) Transparency; (6) Accountability and Responsibility; (7) Risk management and Internal Control; (8) Culture, and (9) Training and Communication. The interplay of the aforementioned dimensions and corporate governance is presented. Finally, quantitative as well as mixed methods research are recommended for a more in-depth understanding and to reduce bias through triangulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Norita Mohd Noor & Amran Rasli & Mas Anom Abdul Rashid & Muhammad Faraz Mubarak & Imelda Hermilinda Abas, 2022. "Ranking of Corporate Governance Dimensions: A Delphi Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:173-:d:981043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/173/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/173/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Storey, D. J., 2002. "Education, training and development policies and practices in medium-sized companies in the UK: do they really influence firm performance?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 249-264, August.
    2. Zainabu Tumwebaze & Veronica Mukyala & Bob Ssekiziyivu & Caroline Bonareri Tirisa & Ashim Tumwebonire, 2018. "Corporate governance, internal audit function and accountability in statutory corporations," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1527054-152, January.
    3. Hao Jiao & Tang Wang & Ilan Alon, 2021. "Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth, and founder exits: an empirical examination of Chinese IPOs," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3-4), pages 208-226, March.
    4. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:681-691 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. NEAGOE Aida, 2022. "Corporate Governance In Romania: The Board Structure An Overview Of Betplus Companies," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(1), pages 145-153, April.
    6. Donald C. Hambrick & Axel v. Werder & Edward J. Zajac, 2008. "New Directions in Corporate Governance Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 381-385, June.
    7. Maya SARI & A de Fatma LUBIS & Azhar MAKSUM & Prihatin LUMBANRAJA, 2018. "The Influence of Organization s Culture and Internal Control to Corporate Governance and is Impact on Bumn State Owned Enterprises Corporate Performance in Indonesia," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 681-691.
    8. Seong Mi Bae & Md. Abdul Kaium Masud & Jong Dae Kim, 2018. "A Cross-Country Investigation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: A Signaling Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    2. Bing Wang & Si Xu & Kung-Cheng Ho & I-Ming Jiang & Hung-Yi Huang, 2019. "Information Disclosure Ranking, Industry Production Market Competition, and Mispricing: An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Palash Deb & Parthiban David & Jonathan O'Brien, 2017. "When is cash good or bad for firm performance?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 436-454, February.
    4. Hüttenbrink, Alexander & Oehmichen, Jana & Rapp, Marc Steffen & Wolff, Michael, 2014. "Pay-for-performance – Does one size fit all? A multi-country study of Europe and the United States," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1179-1192.
    5. Shan Xue & Yi Tang & Yuehua Xu & Chu-Ding Ling & Xiao-Yun Xie & Shenjiang Mo, 2024. "How boards’ factional faultlines affect corporate financial fraud," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 351-376, March.
    6. Chidiebele Innocent Onyali & Chinedu Uchenna Okerekeoti, 2018. "Board Heterogeneity and Corporate Performance of Firms in Nigeria," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 103-117, July.
    7. Oliver Lukason & María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano, 2020. "Corporate Governance Characteristics of Private SMEs’ Annual Report Submission Violations," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Gerard Seijts & Alyson Byrne & Mary M. Crossan & Jeffrey Gandz, 2019. "Leader character in board governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(1), pages 227-258, March.
    9. Kuo-Pin Yang & Gavin M. Schwarz, 2016. "A Multilevel Analysis of the Performance Implications of Excess Control in Business Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1219-1236, October.
    10. Alessandro Minichilli & Mattias Nordqvist & Guido Corbetta & Mario Daniele Amore, 2014. "CEO Succession Mechanisms, Organizational Context, and Performance: A Socio-Emotional Wealth Perspective on Family-Controlled Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7), pages 1153-1179, November.
    11. Saskia Crucke & Adelien Decramer, 2016. "The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    12. Ruth V. Aguilera & Valentina Marano & Ilir Haxhi, 2019. "International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(4), pages 457-498, June.
    13. Andreas Georgiadis & Christos N. Pitelis, 2010. "The Interrelationship between HR, Strategy and Profitability in Service SMEs: Empirical Evidence from the UK Tourism Hospitality and Leisure Sector," CEP Discussion Papers dp0972, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Frits H. Wijbenga & Theo J.B.M. Postma & Rebecca Stratling, 2007. "The Influence of the Venture Capitalist's Governance Activities on the Entrepreneurial Firm's Control Systems and Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(2), pages 257-277, March.
    15. Vathsala Wickramasinghe & Anuradha Premachandra, 2021. "Organizational career growth: the mediating role of career management practices," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(6), pages 1-29, June.
    16. Jeffrey J. Reuer & Elko Klijn & Shivaram Devarakonda & René Olie, 2024. "Veto rights in international joint ventures," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(7), pages 880-895, September.
    17. Zhenyu Jiang & Zongjun Wang & Yanqi Zeng, 2020. "Can voluntary environmental regulation promote corporate technological innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 390-406, February.
    18. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Geoffrey P. Martin, 2022. "Behavioural Agency and Firm Productivity: Revisiting the Incentive Alignment Qualities of Stock Options," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1756-1787, November.
    19. James H. Moore & Matthew S. Kraatz, 2011. "Governance Form and Organizational Adaptation: Lessons from the Savings and Loan Industry in the 1980s," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 850-868, August.
    20. Obey Dzomonda, 2022. "Environmental Sustainability Commitment and Access to Finance by Small and Medium Enterprises: The Role of Financial Performance and Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:173-:d:981043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.