IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i4p142-d946989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Institutionalization of Implicit and Explicit CSR in a Developing Country Context: The Case of Lebanon

Author

Listed:
  • Samer Kobrossy

    (College of Business Administration Faculty, American University of the Emirates, Dubai 503000, United Arab Emirates)

  • Robert Karaszewski

    (College of Business Administration Faculty, American University of the Emirates, Dubai 503000, United Arab Emirates)

  • Riad AlChami

    (College of Business Administration Faculty, American University of the Emirates, Dubai 503000, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

This article presents a qualitative study pertaining to the interface between business and society that primarily focuses on the prominent institutional factors that are influencing organizations to adopt explicit and implicit forms of corporate social responsibility in a developing country context. This is a pertinent subject because developing countries contain a large proportion of the world’s population and, subsequently, a large proportion of salient issues in the social, economic, and environmental arena. This study identifies that, in the country context chosen namely Lebanon, explicit social responsibility initiatives are driven by predominantly normative and mimetic institutional pressures emanating from both local and international institutions. This study also identifies that implicit social responsibility initiatives are driven by normative institutional pressures emanating from elements in the national business system. Contributions of this study include a conceptual model to aid future research, identifying the importance of the duality of corporate social responsibility, the importance of international institutions in facilitating explicit social responsibility proliferation, and the importance for managers to include explicit social responsibility initiatives in their organizational mandate. Future research can use a different sampling technique, conduct interviews with employees that are not directly involved with social responsibility initiatives, or use other perspectives, such as agency theory or theory of institutional logics, to gain more insight on the topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Samer Kobrossy & Robert Karaszewski & Riad AlChami, 2022. "The Institutionalization of Implicit and Explicit CSR in a Developing Country Context: The Case of Lebanon," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:142-:d:946989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/142/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/142/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zainuddin Notanubun, 2021. "The Effect of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Leadership Effectiveness on Public Sectors Organizational Performance: Study in the Department of Education, Youth and Sports in Maluku Province, ," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Marek Sieminski & Ewa Wedrowska & Krzysztof Krukowski, 2020. "Cultural Aspect of Social Responsibility Implementation in SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 68-84.
    3. Sepideh Parsa & Narisa Dai & Ataur Belal & Teng Li & Guliang Tang, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: political, social and corporate influences," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 36-64, January.
    4. Ibrahem Alshbili & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2020. "The influence of institutional context on corporate social responsibility disclosure: a case of a developing country," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 269-293, July.
    5. Tanusree Jain & Ruth V. Aguilera & Dima Jamali, 2017. "Corporate Stakeholder Orientation in an Emerging Country Context: A Longitudinal Cross Industry Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 701-719, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueyan Dong & Jingyu Gao & Sunny Li Sun & Kangtao Ye, 2021. "Doing extreme by doing good," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 291-315, March.
    2. Jaime-Andres Correa-Garcia & Maria-Antonia Garcia-Benau & Emma Garcia-Meca, 2018. "CSR Communication Strategies of Colombian Business Groups: An Analysis of Corporate Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Jia Xu & Jiuchang Wei & Liangdong Lu, 2019. "Strategic stakeholder management, environmental corporate social responsibility engagement, and financial performance of stigmatized firms derived from Chinese special environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1027-1044, September.
    4. Kalpina Kumari & Jawad Abbas & Jinsoo Hwang & Lucian Ionel Cioca, 2022. "Does Servant Leadership Promote Emotional Intelligence and Organizational Citizenship Behavior among Employees? A Structural Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Nikolina Markota Vukic & Mislav Ante Omazic & Ana Aleksic, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Reporting: Overview of Practice in Selected European Countries," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 17(2-B), pages 355-367.
    6. Marcia Sierdovski & Luiz Alberto Pilatti & Priscila Rubbo, 2022. "Organizational Competencies in the Development of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria in the Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Rob Kim Marjerison & Matthew Andrews & George Kuan, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Organizations through Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Garanina, Tatiana & Kim, Oksana, 2023. "The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Ruixin Su & Weizhou Zhong, 2022. "Corporate Communication of CSR in China: Characteristics and Regional Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Nikolina Markota Vukic & Mislav Ante Omazic & Ana Aleksic, 2018. "Exploring the Link between Corporate Stakeholder Orientation and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(2), pages 275-288.
    11. Figueira, Sandra & Gauthier, Caroline & Torres de Oliveira, Rui, 2023. "CSR and stakeholder salience in MNE subsidiaries in emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    12. Michael A. Hitt & David G. Sirmon & Yuan Li & Abby Ghobadian & Jean-Luc Arregle & Kai Xu, 2021. "Institutions, industries and entrepreneurial versus advantage-based strategies: how complex, nested environments affect strategic choice," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 147-188, March.
    13. Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Minhas Akbar & Ahsan Akbar & Petra Poulova, 2021. "Do ESG Endeavors Assist Firms in Achieving Superior Financial Performance? A Case of 100 Best Corporate Citizens," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    14. Jesús Mauricio Flórez-Parra & Gracia Rubio Martín & Carmen Rapallo Serrano, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Crowdfunding: The Experience of the Colectual Platform in Empowering Economic and Sustainable Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Ahmed A. Sarhan & Basil Al‐Najjar, 2023. "The influence of corporate governance and shareholding structure on corporate social responsibility: The key role of executive compensation," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 4532-4556, October.
    16. Gilbert K. Amoako & Anokye M. Adam & George Tackie & Clement Lamboi Arthur, 2021. "Environmental Accountability Practices of Environmentally Sensitive Firms in Ghana: Does Institutional Isomorphism Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Giordino, Daniele & Jabeen, Fauzia & Nirino, Niccolò & Bresciani, Stefano, 2024. "Institutional investors ownership concentration and its effect on disclosure and transparency of United Nations sustainable development goals," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Yongfeng Zhang & Peng Wang & Jongwook Kwon, 2021. "CSR in China: Does Being Close to the Central or Local Government Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Yann Truong & Brian G. Nagy, 2021. "Nascent ventures’ green initiatives and angel investor judgments of legitimacy and funding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1801-1818, December.
    20. He, Jingbin & Ma, Xinru, 2023. "Is corporate social responsibility engagement influenced by nearby firms? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:142-:d:946989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.