IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i1p19-d502541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Samsung vs. Apple: How Different Communication Strategies Affect Consumers in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Margarida Almeida

    (Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eva Sousa

    (Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Carolina Rodrigues

    (Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Maria Beatriz Candeias

    (Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira

    (INESC TEC, GOVCOPP, Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

It is indisputable that technology is present in everyday life. In this digital era, brands need to adapt to the changing pace of the needs and desires of society to distinguish themselves from their adversaries, especially in the electronic environment. Hence, they must have well-defined and successful marketing and advertising strategies to achieve a place on the podium of preference of consumers. This work intends to understand how the communication strategies of Apple and Samsung affect the decisions of consumers in Portugal to buy electronic devices. To this end, a survey was conducted, and the responses of 700 individuals who reside in Portugal were analysed through descriptive and inferential (chi-square test of independence) statistics. The survey results show that cost-benefit, price, technical specifications, and performance are the characteristics that weigh the most when purchasing electronic devices, as well as the perceived prestige of the brand. Additionally, an association was found between having only one device and having more products of the brand, with Apple users having more frequently more than one of the brand’s products than Samsung users. We thus concluded that Apple consumers are more loyal. It was also found that the store where the devices are brought is not independent, in Portugal, of the brand of the devices. Apple users buy more brand products from the brand store, both physical and online, than Samsung users. Finally, advertisements and word-of-mouth were found to be fundamental for consumers to acknowledge brand devices, and the degree in which this happens is also not independent of the brand, in Portugal, as a chi-square independence test showed.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarida Almeida & Eva Sousa & Carolina Rodrigues & Maria Beatriz Candeias & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, 2021. "Samsung vs. Apple: How Different Communication Strategies Affect Consumers in Portugal," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:19-:d:502541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/1/19/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/1/19/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Besanko & Wayne L. Winston, 1990. "Optimal Price Skimming by a Monopolist Facing Rational Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 555-567, May.
    2. Josphine Chepchirchir & Mark Leting, 2015. "Effects of Brand Quality, Brand Prestige on Brand Purchase Intention of Mobile Phone Brands: Empirical Assessment from Kenya," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(11), pages 7-14, October.
    3. Coelho, Pedro Simões & Rita, Paulo & Santos, Zélia Raposo, 2018. "On the relationship between consumer-brand identification, brand community, and brand loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 101-110.
    4. Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón & Marc Polo-López & Josep Rom-Rodríguez & Pedro Mir-Bernal, 2020. "Social Media Influence on Consumer Behavior: The Case of Mobile Telephony Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neda Letukytė & Sigitas Urbonavičius, 2022. "Impact of the Congruence Between Brand Personality and Consumer Personality on Emotional Loyalty: What Makes Apple and Samsung Different," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 34(1), pages 59-77.
    2. Xi Zhang, 2022. "Incremental Innovation: Long-Term Impetus for Design Business Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincent Mak & Amnon Rapoport & Eyran J. Gisches & Jiaojie Han, 2014. "Purchasing Scarce Products Under Dynamic Pricing: An Experimental Investigation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 425-438, July.
    2. Namin, Aidin & Soysal, Gonca P. & Ratchford, Brian T., 2022. "Alleviating demand uncertainty for seasonal goods: An analysis of attribute-based markdown policy for fashion retailers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 671-681.
    3. Adam J. Mersereau & Dan Zhang, 2012. "Markdown Pricing with Unknown Fraction of Strategic Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 355-370, July.
    4. Tilson, Vera & Zheng, Xiaobo, 2014. "Monopoly production and pricing of finitely durable goods with strategic consumers׳ fluctuating willingness to pay," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 217-232.
    5. Gonca P. Soysal & Lakshman Krishnamurthi, 2012. "Demand Dynamics in the Seasonal Goods Industry: An Empirical Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 293-316, March.
    6. Wedad Elmaghraby & Altan Gülcü & P{i}nar Keskinocak, 2008. "Designing Optimal Preannounced Markdowns in the Presence of Rational Customers with Multiunit Demands," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 126-148, June.
    7. Selcuk, Cemil & Gokpinar, Bilal, 2017. "Fixed vs. Flexible Pricing in a Competitive Market," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2017/9, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    8. Christian Borgs & Ozan Candogan & Jennifer Chayes & Ilan Lobel & Hamid Nazerzadeh, 2014. "Optimal Multiperiod Pricing with Service Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1792-1811, July.
    9. Cohen-Vernik, Dinah & Pazgal, Amit, 2017. "Price Adjustment Policy with Partial Refunds," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 507-526.
    10. Jue Wang & Yuri Levin & Mikhail Nediak, 2019. "Selling Passes to Strategic Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1095-1115, July.
    11. Li Li & Li Jiang, 2022. "How should firms adapt pricing strategies when consumers are time‐inconsistent?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3457-3473, September.
    12. Francisco J. Martínez-López & Rocío Aguilar-Illescas & Sebastián Molinillo & Rafael Anaya-Sánchez & J. Andres Coca-Stefaniak & Irene Esteban-Millat, 2021. "The Role of Online Brand Community Engagement on the Consumer–Brand Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Nair, Anand & Closs, David J., 2006. "An examination of the impact of coordinating supply chain policies and price markdowns on short lifecycle product retail performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 379-392, August.
    14. Qian Liu & Garrett J. van Ryzin, 2008. "Strategic Capacity Rationing to Induce Early Purchases," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1115-1131, June.
    15. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Mateusz Grzesiak, 2020. "Cooperation between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Online and Offline Environments vs. the Benefits Derived by Active Purchasers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Dongdong Yu & Miyu Wan & Chunlin Luo, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and dual‐channel choice in the presence of strategic consumers," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2392-2408, September.
    17. Chaab, Jafar & Salhab, Rabih & Zaccour, Georges, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and advertising in the presence of strategic consumers and social contagion: A mean-field game approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Paulo Maçãs Nunes, 2015. "Pricing Strategy In The Context Of Durable Goods Monopoly With Discrete Demand," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 60(204), pages 61-74, January –.
    19. Robert Zeithammer, 2007. "—Optimal Selling in Dynamic Auctions: Adaptation Versus Commitment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 859-867, 11-12.
    20. Kejriwal, Saransh & Sheth, Sarjan & Silpa, P.S. & Sarkar, Sumit & Guha, Apratim, 2022. "Attaining herd immunity to a new infectious disease through multi-stage policies incentivising voluntary vaccination," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:19-:d:502541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.