IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fru/finjrn/200503p43-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approaches to Regulating E-Money Market in the Eurasian Economic Community: Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Victor L. Dostov

    (Russian Electronic Money and Remittance Association (REMA), Moscow 107078, Russian Federation; Distributed Ledger Technologies Center of SPbU (NTI competence center), Saint Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation)

  • Pavel M. Shoust

    (Russian Electronic Money and Remittance Association (REMA), Moscow 107078, Russian Federation; Distributed Ledger Technologies Center of SPbU (NTI competence center), Saint Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation)

  • Gleb V. Alekseev

    (Russian Electronic Money and Remittance Association (REMA), Moscow 107078, Russian Federation)

  • Svetlana V. Krivoruchko

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 125993, Russian Federation)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to identify relevant (general and particular) elements of electronic money regulation in Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Belarus and Armenia. For the purposes of comparative analysis, the paper first introduces the methodology by outlining such factors as the legal status of electronic money issuers (including prudential requirements), differentiation of customer due diligence requirements in e-money systems, e-wallet usage rules, and division between the issuing and e-money transfer functionalities. Second, these factors are analyzed for each country, based on current regulatory acts. Finally, synthetic conclusions regarding major regional trends for regulation of e-money as a financial service are made. In most countries, e-money issuers are subject to licensing for the purposes of financial stability. Yet, approaches to differentiating functions of e-money actors vary across countries: in some of them, regulation recognizes “e-money operators” which transfer e-money but do not issue it. However, actual effects of this differentiation merits additional research. Almost all countries have implemented remote (simplified) identification which underlines the role of e-money as a “simplified” product aimed at financial inclusion. All countries except the Republic of Belarus and the Kyrgyz Republic still recognize non-personified electronic wallets. The research confirms that electronic money is still a specific instrument aimed at supporting financial inclusion and satisfying demand for instant cashless payments. More research is required to assess the actual effects of different regulatory approaches on the development of the e-money market.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor L. Dostov & Pavel M. Shoust & Gleb V. Alekseev & Svetlana V. Krivoruchko, 2020. "Approaches to Regulating E-Money Market in the Eurasian Economic Community: Comparative Analysis," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 43-58, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:200503:p:43-58
    DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2020-5-43-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2020/5/statii/03_5_2020_v12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31107/2075-1990-2020-5-43-58?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Fung & Miguel Molico & Gerald Stuber, 2014. "Electronic Money and Payments: Recent Developments and Issues," Discussion Papers 14-2, Bank of Canada.
    2. Athanassiou, Phoebus & Mas-Guix, Natalia, 2008. "Electronic money institutions - current trends, regulatory issues and future prospects," Legal Working Paper Series 7, European Central Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janet Hua Jiang & Enchuan Shao, 2014. "Understanding the Cash Demand Puzzle," Staff Working Papers 14-22, Bank of Canada.
    2. Christie Smith & Aaron Kumar, 2018. "Crypto‐Currencies – An Introduction To Not‐So‐Funny Moneys," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1531-1559, December.
    3. Imola Drigă & Codruța Dura & Loredana Cristea, 2016. "Non-Cash Payments - Trends and Prospects," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 16(2), pages 13-20.
    4. Ben Fung & Hanna Halaburda, 2016. "Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Framework for Assessing Why and How," Discussion Papers 16-22, Bank of Canada.
    5. Janet Hua Jiang & Enchuan Shao, 2020. "The Cash Paradox," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 36, pages 177-197, April.
    6. Athanassiou, Phoebus, 2009. "Withdrawal and expulsion from the EU and EMU: some reflections," Legal Working Paper Series 10, European Central Bank.
    7. Warren E. Weber, 2014. "The Efficiency of Private E-Money-Like Systems: The U.S. Experience with State Bank Notes," Staff Working Papers 14-15, Bank of Canada.
    8. Walter Engert & Ben Fung, 2017. "Central Bank Digital Currency: Motivations and Implications," Discussion Papers 17-16, Bank of Canada.
    9. León, Carlos, 2021. "The dawn of a mobile payment scheme: The case of Movii," Working papers 78, Red Investigadores de Economía.
    10. Warren E. Weber, 2015. "The efficiency of private e-money-like systems: the U.S. experience with national bank notes," FRB Atlanta CenFIS Working Paper 15-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    11. Hongyu Xiao, 2024. "Demand for Canadian Banknotes from International Travel: Indirect Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic," Staff Working Papers 24-23, Bank of Canada.
    12. Laurent, Alain & Monvoisin, Virginie, 2015. "Les nouvelles monnaies numériques : au-delà de la dématérialisation de la monnaie et de la contestation des banques," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 18.
    13. Arango, Carlos & Huynh, Kim P. & Sabetti, Leonard, 2015. "Consumer payment choice: Merchant card acceptance versus pricing incentives," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 130-141.
    14. Warren E. Weber, 2015. "Government and Private E-Money-Like Systems: Federal Reserve Notes and National Bank Notes," Staff Working Papers 15-18, Bank of Canada.
    15. Zlatko BEZHOVSKI & Ljupco DAVCEV & Mila MITREVA, 2021. "Current adoption state of cryptocurrencies as an electronic payment method," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 44-50, March.
    16. Lambrinoc, Simona Elena, 2009. "The legal duty to consult the European Central Bank - National and EU consultations," Legal Working Paper Series 9, European Central Bank.
    17. G. Ardizzi & F. Crudu & C. Petraglia, 2015. "The Impact of Electronic Payments on Bank Cost Efficiency: Nonparametric Evidence," Working Paper CRENoS 201517, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    18. Jonathan Chiu & Tsz-Nga Wong, 2014. "E-Money: Efficiency, Stability and Optimal Policy," Staff Working Papers 14-16, Bank of Canada.
    19. Park, Jaevin & Kwon, Ohik, 2023. "Stablecoins: Legal restrictions theory and monetary policy," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    20. Walter Engert & Ben Fung & Scott Hendry, 2018. "Is a Cashless Society Problematic?," Discussion Papers 18-12, Bank of Canada.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regulation of e-money; Eurasian Economic Community; types of identification; e-money issuers; agents for providing services in the e-money system; e-money operators; e-money institutions; e-wallets; prepaid cards;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:200503:p:43-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gennady Ageev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frigvru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.