IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedker/99289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Future of U.S. Productivity: Cautious Optimism amid Uncertainty

Author

Abstract

Recent productivity growth likely reflects both cyclical and structural factors, including remote work and AI.

Suggested Citation

  • Nida Çakır Melek & Alex Gallin, 2024. "The Future of U.S. Productivity: Cautious Optimism amid Uncertainty," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedker:99289
    DOI: 10.18651/ER/v109n9CakirMelekGallin
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/10602/EconomicReviewV109N9CakirMelekGallin.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18651/ER/v109n9CakirMelekGallin?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Emanuel & Emma Harrington, 2024. "Working Remotely? Selection, Treatment, and the Market for Remote Work," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 528-559, October.
    2. José María Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis, 2023. "The Evolution of Work from Home," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 23-50, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goulas, Sofoklis, 2025. "The Value of Remote Work: A Correspondence Experiment on Tutors," IZA Discussion Papers 17592, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Pablo Zarate & Mathias Dolls & Steven J. Davis & Nicholas Bloom & Jose Maria Barrero & Cevat Giray Aksoy, 2024. "Why Does Working from Home Vary across Countries and People?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11081, CESifo.
    3. Bietenbeck, Jan & Irmert, Natalie & Nilsson, Therese, 2024. "Individualism and Working from Home," Working Paper Series 1498, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    4. Natalia Bartkowiak-Bakun, 2024. "Identification of Changes in the Determinants of Rural Development in the Context of the Crisis Caused by COVID-19," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 620-634.
    5. Malak Kandoussi, 2023. "A New Norm? Exploring the Shift to Working From Home in the Post-Pandemic Labor Market," Documents de recherche 23-09, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.
    6. Steven J. Davis, 2024. "The Big Shift in Working Arrangements: Eight Ways Unusual," NBER Working Papers 32363, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Meister, Lorenz & Menkhoff, Lukas & Schröder, Carsten, 2024. "Work from Home, Stock Market Participation, and Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges 302335, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Rosalie L. Tung, 2024. "Reflections on the 2023 JIBS Decade Award: Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(1), pages 1-9, February.
    9. Goux, Dominique & Maurin, Eric, 2024. "Sick of Working from Home?," IZA Discussion Papers 16848, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & Karel Mertens & Hannah Rubinton, 2024. "Work from Home and Interstate Migration," Working Papers 2024-012, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    11. Belloc, Ignacio & Gimenez-Nadal, José Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2024. "Teleworking and Travel Purposes: UK Evidence after the COVID-19 Pandemic," IZA Discussion Papers 17413, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Jirjahn, Uwe & Rienzo, Cinzia, 2024. "Working from Home and Performance Pay: Individual or Collective Payment Schemes?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1481, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. Mathieu P.A. Steijn, 2024. "The persistence and nature of the labor reallocation shock during the COVID-19 crisis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-047/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Yi Zhang & Dan Li & Shengren Liu, 2024. "Research on the Impact of the Public Safety Emergencies on Women Riders’ Preference of Shanghai Real-Time Crowdsourcing Logistics Platform," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    15. Benjamin Schneider & Jane Whittle, 2024. "Where is the Place in the History of Work? Worksites, Workspaces, and the Home-Work Nexus," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _213, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    16. Masayuki Morikawa, 2024. "Productivity dynamics of work from home: Firm-level evidence from Japan," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 465-487, April.
    17. Esposito, P. & Mendolia, S. & Scicchitano, S. & Tealdi, C., 2024. "Working from home and job satisfaction: The role of gender and personality traits," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1382, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & Aidan Caplan & Tristan Caplan, 2024. "Measuring Trends in Work From Home: Evidence from Six U.S. Datasets," Working Papers 2024-023, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, revised 12 Dec 2024.
    19. Bernardus Doornik & Deniz Igan & Enisse Kharroubi, 2023. "Labour markets: what explains the resilience?," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, December.
    20. Stefania Capecchi & Francesca Iorio & Nunzia Nappo, 2024. "Occupational Stress, Working from Home, and Job Sustainability: Another Gender Issue?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1193-1218, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedker:99289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zach Kastens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbkcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.